Biomedical Nanoparticles: Overview of Their Surface Immune-Compatibility

Diagnostic- and therapeutic release-aimed nanoparticles require the highest degree of biocompatibility. Some physical and chemical characteristics of such nanomaterials are often at odds with this requirement. For instance, metals with specific features used as contrast agents in magnetic resonance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olimpia Gamucci, Alice Bertero, Mariacristina Gagliardi, Giuseppe Bardi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-02-01
Series:Coatings
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/4/1/139
id doaj-81f2f7d9eeda43dea16a95d4e0bad7de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81f2f7d9eeda43dea16a95d4e0bad7de2020-11-24T22:30:25ZengMDPI AGCoatings2079-64122014-02-014113915910.3390/coatings4010139coatings4010139Biomedical Nanoparticles: Overview of Their Surface Immune-CompatibilityOlimpia Gamucci0Alice Bertero1Mariacristina Gagliardi2Giuseppe Bardi3Center for MicroBioRobotics @SSSA, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera, ItalyCenter for MicroBioRobotics @SSSA, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera, ItalyCenter for MicroBioRobotics @SSSA, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera, ItalyCenter for MicroBioRobotics @SSSA, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56025 Pontedera, ItalyDiagnostic- and therapeutic release-aimed nanoparticles require the highest degree of biocompatibility. Some physical and chemical characteristics of such nanomaterials are often at odds with this requirement. For instance, metals with specific features used as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging need particular coatings to improve their blood solubility and increase their biocompatibility. Other examples come from the development of nanocarriers exploiting the different characteristics of two or more materials, i.e., the ability to encapsulate a certain drug by one core-material and the targeting capability of a different coating surface. Furthermore, all these “human-non-self” modifications necessitate proofs of compatibility with the immune system to avoid inflammatory reactions and resultant adverse effects for the patient. In the present review we discuss the molecular interactions and responses of the immune system to the principal nanoparticle surface modifications used in nanomedicine.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/4/1/139immune systemnanomaterialsimmunogenicityimmunotoxicitybiodistributionmononuclear phagocytic cellssurface modifications
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olimpia Gamucci
Alice Bertero
Mariacristina Gagliardi
Giuseppe Bardi
spellingShingle Olimpia Gamucci
Alice Bertero
Mariacristina Gagliardi
Giuseppe Bardi
Biomedical Nanoparticles: Overview of Their Surface Immune-Compatibility
Coatings
immune system
nanomaterials
immunogenicity
immunotoxicity
biodistribution
mononuclear phagocytic cells
surface modifications
author_facet Olimpia Gamucci
Alice Bertero
Mariacristina Gagliardi
Giuseppe Bardi
author_sort Olimpia Gamucci
title Biomedical Nanoparticles: Overview of Their Surface Immune-Compatibility
title_short Biomedical Nanoparticles: Overview of Their Surface Immune-Compatibility
title_full Biomedical Nanoparticles: Overview of Their Surface Immune-Compatibility
title_fullStr Biomedical Nanoparticles: Overview of Their Surface Immune-Compatibility
title_full_unstemmed Biomedical Nanoparticles: Overview of Their Surface Immune-Compatibility
title_sort biomedical nanoparticles: overview of their surface immune-compatibility
publisher MDPI AG
series Coatings
issn 2079-6412
publishDate 2014-02-01
description Diagnostic- and therapeutic release-aimed nanoparticles require the highest degree of biocompatibility. Some physical and chemical characteristics of such nanomaterials are often at odds with this requirement. For instance, metals with specific features used as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging need particular coatings to improve their blood solubility and increase their biocompatibility. Other examples come from the development of nanocarriers exploiting the different characteristics of two or more materials, i.e., the ability to encapsulate a certain drug by one core-material and the targeting capability of a different coating surface. Furthermore, all these “human-non-self” modifications necessitate proofs of compatibility with the immune system to avoid inflammatory reactions and resultant adverse effects for the patient. In the present review we discuss the molecular interactions and responses of the immune system to the principal nanoparticle surface modifications used in nanomedicine.
topic immune system
nanomaterials
immunogenicity
immunotoxicity
biodistribution
mononuclear phagocytic cells
surface modifications
url http://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/4/1/139
work_keys_str_mv AT olimpiagamucci biomedicalnanoparticlesoverviewoftheirsurfaceimmunecompatibility
AT alicebertero biomedicalnanoparticlesoverviewoftheirsurfaceimmunecompatibility
AT mariacristinagagliardi biomedicalnanoparticlesoverviewoftheirsurfaceimmunecompatibility
AT giuseppebardi biomedicalnanoparticlesoverviewoftheirsurfaceimmunecompatibility
_version_ 1725740935353991168