New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.

The p-value has been debated exorbitantly in the last decades, experiencing fierce critique, but also finding some advocates. The fundamental issue with its misleading interpretation stems from its common use for testing the unrealistic null hypothesis of an effect that is precisely zero. A meaningf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Werner A Stahel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252991
id doaj-82174219063748e5a3f986de2dfd280d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82174219063748e5a3f986de2dfd280d2021-07-02T04:31:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01166e025299110.1371/journal.pone.0252991New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.Werner A StahelThe p-value has been debated exorbitantly in the last decades, experiencing fierce critique, but also finding some advocates. The fundamental issue with its misleading interpretation stems from its common use for testing the unrealistic null hypothesis of an effect that is precisely zero. A meaningful question asks instead whether the effect is relevant. It is then unavoidable that a threshold for relevance is chosen. Considerations that can lead to agreeable conventions for this choice are presented for several commonly used statistical situations. Based on the threshold, a simple quantitative measure of relevance emerges naturally. Statistical inference for the effect should be based on the confidence interval for the relevance measure. A classification of results that goes beyond a simple distinction like "significant / non-significant" is proposed. On the other hand, if desired, a single number called the "secured relevance" may summarize the result, like the p-value does it, but with a scientifically meaningful interpretation.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252991
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Werner A Stahel
spellingShingle Werner A Stahel
New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Werner A Stahel
author_sort Werner A Stahel
title New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.
title_short New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.
title_full New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.
title_fullStr New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.
title_full_unstemmed New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.
title_sort new relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The p-value has been debated exorbitantly in the last decades, experiencing fierce critique, but also finding some advocates. The fundamental issue with its misleading interpretation stems from its common use for testing the unrealistic null hypothesis of an effect that is precisely zero. A meaningful question asks instead whether the effect is relevant. It is then unavoidable that a threshold for relevance is chosen. Considerations that can lead to agreeable conventions for this choice are presented for several commonly used statistical situations. Based on the threshold, a simple quantitative measure of relevance emerges naturally. Statistical inference for the effect should be based on the confidence interval for the relevance measure. A classification of results that goes beyond a simple distinction like "significant / non-significant" is proposed. On the other hand, if desired, a single number called the "secured relevance" may summarize the result, like the p-value does it, but with a scientifically meaningful interpretation.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252991
work_keys_str_mv AT wernerastahel newrelevanceandsignificancemeasurestoreplacepvalues
_version_ 1721339926950182912