New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.
The p-value has been debated exorbitantly in the last decades, experiencing fierce critique, but also finding some advocates. The fundamental issue with its misleading interpretation stems from its common use for testing the unrealistic null hypothesis of an effect that is precisely zero. A meaningf...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252991 |
id |
doaj-82174219063748e5a3f986de2dfd280d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-82174219063748e5a3f986de2dfd280d2021-07-02T04:31:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01166e025299110.1371/journal.pone.0252991New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values.Werner A StahelThe p-value has been debated exorbitantly in the last decades, experiencing fierce critique, but also finding some advocates. The fundamental issue with its misleading interpretation stems from its common use for testing the unrealistic null hypothesis of an effect that is precisely zero. A meaningful question asks instead whether the effect is relevant. It is then unavoidable that a threshold for relevance is chosen. Considerations that can lead to agreeable conventions for this choice are presented for several commonly used statistical situations. Based on the threshold, a simple quantitative measure of relevance emerges naturally. Statistical inference for the effect should be based on the confidence interval for the relevance measure. A classification of results that goes beyond a simple distinction like "significant / non-significant" is proposed. On the other hand, if desired, a single number called the "secured relevance" may summarize the result, like the p-value does it, but with a scientifically meaningful interpretation.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252991 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Werner A Stahel |
spellingShingle |
Werner A Stahel New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Werner A Stahel |
author_sort |
Werner A Stahel |
title |
New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values. |
title_short |
New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values. |
title_full |
New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values. |
title_fullStr |
New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values. |
title_full_unstemmed |
New relevance and significance measures to replace p-values. |
title_sort |
new relevance and significance measures to replace p-values. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
The p-value has been debated exorbitantly in the last decades, experiencing fierce critique, but also finding some advocates. The fundamental issue with its misleading interpretation stems from its common use for testing the unrealistic null hypothesis of an effect that is precisely zero. A meaningful question asks instead whether the effect is relevant. It is then unavoidable that a threshold for relevance is chosen. Considerations that can lead to agreeable conventions for this choice are presented for several commonly used statistical situations. Based on the threshold, a simple quantitative measure of relevance emerges naturally. Statistical inference for the effect should be based on the confidence interval for the relevance measure. A classification of results that goes beyond a simple distinction like "significant / non-significant" is proposed. On the other hand, if desired, a single number called the "secured relevance" may summarize the result, like the p-value does it, but with a scientifically meaningful interpretation. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252991 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wernerastahel newrelevanceandsignificancemeasurestoreplacepvalues |
_version_ |
1721339926950182912 |