Is Turkish FRAX® Model Sufficient? The Analysis of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Turkish Population by Using Frax

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Turkish FRAX model in the prediction of osteoporotic fracture risk and to determine the factors that may affect the results in this model. Material and Methods: Data of 104 patients with hip fracture who had underwent bone densit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmet Aslan, Şule Yağc, Özgür Karakoyun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2014-04-01
Series:Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.turkosteoporozdergisi.org/article_4348/Is-Turkish-Frax-Model-Sufficient-The-Analysis-Of-Osteoporotic-Fracture-Risk-In-Turkish-Population-By-Using-Frax
id doaj-822ab576896445e5867c8dc5e2218cd5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-822ab576896445e5867c8dc5e2218cd52020-11-25T03:52:35ZengGalenos YayineviTürk Osteoporoz Dergisi2147-26532014-04-0120121510.4274/tod.28247Is Turkish FRAX® Model Sufficient? The Analysis of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Turkish Population by Using FraxAhmet Aslan0Şule Yağc1Özgür Karakoyun2Afyonkarahisar Devlet Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği, Afyon, TürkiyeAfyonkarahisar Devlet Hastanesi, Nükleer Tıp Kliniği, Afyon, TürkiyeNamık Kemal Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Tekirdağ, TürkiyeObjectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Turkish FRAX model in the prediction of osteoporotic fracture risk and to determine the factors that may affect the results in this model. Material and Methods: Data of 104 patients with hip fracture who had underwent bone densitometry scan between 2009-2012, in Kastamonu and Afyon cities in Turkey, were assessed in this study. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group-1; patients with osteoporotic hip fractures (n=36), Group-2; patients with other osteoporotic bone fractures (n=33), Group-3; patients with no osteoporotic fracture history (n=35). The recent osteoporotic fractures in patients were ruled out and by noting the former fractures and previously determined risk factors, fracture risks were calculated by Frax method. The groups were compared on the basis of fracture risks, t-scores and demographical characteristics. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the patients with major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) in Group-1 and Group-2 and patients with no MOF history in Group-3 (p<0.05). When t-scores were compared between the groups, there was difference between Group-1 and Group-3 (p<0.05), there was no difference between Group-2 and 3 (p>0.05). With respect to average age in patients, a significant difference was found between Group-1 and 3(p<0.05), however, no statistical difference between Group-2 and Group-3 (p>0.05). Also, no statistically meaningful difference with regard to other risk factors was found between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Results of this study: previous MOFs, advanced age and a remarkable decrease in t-scores are the main risk factors in osteoporotic fractures. Turkish FRAX® model may be useful in the prediction of fracture risk in patients with increased risk factors in Turkish population. However, this study may not be adequate to rule out the concerns that Turkish Frax model must be revised to fulfill the expectations in determining osteoporotic fracture risk. (Turkish Journal of Osteoporosis 2014;20: 21-5)http://www.turkosteoporozdergisi.org/article_4348/Is-Turkish-Frax-Model-Sufficient-The-Analysis-Of-Osteoporotic-Fracture-Risk-In-Turkish-Population-By-Using-FraxOsteoporosisosteoporotic fracturehip fracturefraxrisk factors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmet Aslan
Şule Yağc
Özgür Karakoyun
spellingShingle Ahmet Aslan
Şule Yağc
Özgür Karakoyun
Is Turkish FRAX® Model Sufficient? The Analysis of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Turkish Population by Using Frax
Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi
Osteoporosis
osteoporotic fracture
hip fracture
frax
risk factors
author_facet Ahmet Aslan
Şule Yağc
Özgür Karakoyun
author_sort Ahmet Aslan
title Is Turkish FRAX® Model Sufficient? The Analysis of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Turkish Population by Using Frax
title_short Is Turkish FRAX® Model Sufficient? The Analysis of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Turkish Population by Using Frax
title_full Is Turkish FRAX® Model Sufficient? The Analysis of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Turkish Population by Using Frax
title_fullStr Is Turkish FRAX® Model Sufficient? The Analysis of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Turkish Population by Using Frax
title_full_unstemmed Is Turkish FRAX® Model Sufficient? The Analysis of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Turkish Population by Using Frax
title_sort is turkish frax® model sufficient? the analysis of osteoporotic fracture risk in turkish population by using frax
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
series Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi
issn 2147-2653
publishDate 2014-04-01
description Objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Turkish FRAX model in the prediction of osteoporotic fracture risk and to determine the factors that may affect the results in this model. Material and Methods: Data of 104 patients with hip fracture who had underwent bone densitometry scan between 2009-2012, in Kastamonu and Afyon cities in Turkey, were assessed in this study. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group-1; patients with osteoporotic hip fractures (n=36), Group-2; patients with other osteoporotic bone fractures (n=33), Group-3; patients with no osteoporotic fracture history (n=35). The recent osteoporotic fractures in patients were ruled out and by noting the former fractures and previously determined risk factors, fracture risks were calculated by Frax method. The groups were compared on the basis of fracture risks, t-scores and demographical characteristics. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the patients with major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) in Group-1 and Group-2 and patients with no MOF history in Group-3 (p<0.05). When t-scores were compared between the groups, there was difference between Group-1 and Group-3 (p<0.05), there was no difference between Group-2 and 3 (p>0.05). With respect to average age in patients, a significant difference was found between Group-1 and 3(p<0.05), however, no statistical difference between Group-2 and Group-3 (p>0.05). Also, no statistically meaningful difference with regard to other risk factors was found between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Results of this study: previous MOFs, advanced age and a remarkable decrease in t-scores are the main risk factors in osteoporotic fractures. Turkish FRAX® model may be useful in the prediction of fracture risk in patients with increased risk factors in Turkish population. However, this study may not be adequate to rule out the concerns that Turkish Frax model must be revised to fulfill the expectations in determining osteoporotic fracture risk. (Turkish Journal of Osteoporosis 2014;20: 21-5)
topic Osteoporosis
osteoporotic fracture
hip fracture
frax
risk factors
url http://www.turkosteoporozdergisi.org/article_4348/Is-Turkish-Frax-Model-Sufficient-The-Analysis-Of-Osteoporotic-Fracture-Risk-In-Turkish-Population-By-Using-Frax
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmetaslan isturkishfraxmodelsufficienttheanalysisofosteoporoticfractureriskinturkishpopulationbyusingfrax
AT suleyagc isturkishfraxmodelsufficienttheanalysisofosteoporoticfractureriskinturkishpopulationbyusingfrax
AT ozgurkarakoyun isturkishfraxmodelsufficienttheanalysisofosteoporoticfractureriskinturkishpopulationbyusingfrax
_version_ 1724482028931383296