Automated analysis of digital fundus autofluorescence images of geographic atrophy in advanced age-related macular degeneration using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fundus autofluorescence (AF) imaging using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO) provides an accurate delineation of areas of geographic atrophy (GA).</p> <p>Automated computer-assisted methods for detecting and r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bindewald A, Jorzik J, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Deckert A, Holz FG, Mansmann U
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-04-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/5/8
Description
Summary:<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fundus autofluorescence (AF) imaging using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO) provides an accurate delineation of areas of geographic atrophy (GA).</p> <p>Automated computer-assisted methods for detecting and removing interfering vessels are needed to support the GA quantification process in longitudinal studies and in reading centres.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A test tool was implemented that uses region-growing techniques to segment GA areas. An algorithm for illuminating shadows can be used to process low-quality images. Agreement between observers and between three different methods was evaluated by two independent readers in a pilot study. Agreement and objectivity were assessed using the Bland-Altman approach.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The new method (C) identifies vascular structures that interfere with the delineation of GA. Results are comparable to those of two commonly used procedures (A, B), with a mean difference between C and A of -0.67 mm<sup>2 </sup>(95% CI [-0.99, -0.36]), between B and A of -0.81 mm<sup>2</sup>, (95% CI [-1.08, -0.53]), and between C and B of 0.15 mm<sup>2 </sup>(95% CI [-0.12, 0.41]). Objectivity of a method is quantified by the mean difference between observers: A 0.30 mm<sup>2 </sup>(95% CI [0.02, 0.57]), B -0.11 mm<sup>2 </sup>(95% CI [-0.28, 0.10]), and C 0.12 mm<sup>2 </sup>(95% CI [0.02, 0.22]).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The novel procedure is comparable with regard to objectivity and inter-reader agreement to established methods of quantifying GA. It considerably speeds up the lengthy measurement process in AF with well defined GA zones.</p>
ISSN:1471-2415