Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines

Abstract Background The ineffective implementation of evidence based practice guidelines can mean that the best health outcomes are not achieved. This study examined the barriers and enablers to the uptake and implementation of the new bi-national (Australia and New Zealand) antenatal corticosteroid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. L. Mc Goldrick, T Crawford, J. A. Brown, K. M. Groom, C. A. Crowther
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2016-10-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-016-1858-8
id doaj-8255b38349304f55be33385dc8bca629
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8255b38349304f55be33385dc8bca6292020-11-25T00:24:00ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632016-10-0116111410.1186/s12913-016-1858-8Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice GuidelinesE. L. Mc Goldrick0T Crawford1J. A. Brown2K. M. Groom3C. A. Crowther4Liggins Institute, The University of AucklandLiggins Institute, The University of AucklandLiggins Institute, The University of AucklandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of AucklandLiggins Institute, The University of AucklandAbstract Background The ineffective implementation of evidence based practice guidelines can mean that the best health outcomes are not achieved. This study examined the barriers and enablers to the uptake and implementation of the new bi-national (Australia and New Zealand) antenatal corticosteroid clinical practice guidelines among health professionals, using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Methods Semi-structured interviews or online questionnaires were conducted across four health professional groups and three district health boards in Auckland, New Zealand. The questions were constructed to reflect the 14 behavioural domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework. Relevant domains were identified by the presence of conflicting beliefs within a domain; the frequency of beliefs; and the likely strength of the impact of a belief on the behaviour using thematic analysis. The influence of health professional group and organisation on the different barriers and enablers identified were explored. Results Seventy-three health professionals completed either a semi-structured interview (n = 35) or on-line questionnaire (n = 38). Seven behavioural domains were identified as overarching enablers: belief about consequences; knowledge; social influences; environmental context and resource; belief about capabilities; social professional role and identity; and behavioural regulation. Five behavioural domains were identified as overarching barriers: environmental context and resources; knowledge; social influences; belief about consequences; and social professional role and identity. Differences in beliefs between individual health professional groups were identified within the domains: belief about consequences; social professional role and identity; and emotion. Organisational differences were identified within the domains: belief about consequences; social influences; and belief about capabilities. Conclusion This study has identified some of the enablers and barriers to implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines using the validated Theoretical Domains Framework, as perceived by health professionals. We have identified differences between individual health professional groups and organisations. The identification of these behavioural determinants can be used to enhance an implementation strategy, assist in the design of interventions to achieve improved implementation and facilitate process evaluations to understand why or how change interventions are effective.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-016-1858-8ImplementationClinical practice guidelinesAntenatal corticosteroidsTheoretical domains framework
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. L. Mc Goldrick
T Crawford
J. A. Brown
K. M. Groom
C. A. Crowther
spellingShingle E. L. Mc Goldrick
T Crawford
J. A. Brown
K. M. Groom
C. A. Crowther
Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines
BMC Health Services Research
Implementation
Clinical practice guidelines
Antenatal corticosteroids
Theoretical domains framework
author_facet E. L. Mc Goldrick
T Crawford
J. A. Brown
K. M. Groom
C. A. Crowther
author_sort E. L. Mc Goldrick
title Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines
title_short Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines
title_full Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines
title_fullStr Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines
title_sort identifying the barriers and enablers in the implementation of the new zealand and australian antenatal corticosteroid clinical practice guidelines
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Abstract Background The ineffective implementation of evidence based practice guidelines can mean that the best health outcomes are not achieved. This study examined the barriers and enablers to the uptake and implementation of the new bi-national (Australia and New Zealand) antenatal corticosteroid clinical practice guidelines among health professionals, using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Methods Semi-structured interviews or online questionnaires were conducted across four health professional groups and three district health boards in Auckland, New Zealand. The questions were constructed to reflect the 14 behavioural domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework. Relevant domains were identified by the presence of conflicting beliefs within a domain; the frequency of beliefs; and the likely strength of the impact of a belief on the behaviour using thematic analysis. The influence of health professional group and organisation on the different barriers and enablers identified were explored. Results Seventy-three health professionals completed either a semi-structured interview (n = 35) or on-line questionnaire (n = 38). Seven behavioural domains were identified as overarching enablers: belief about consequences; knowledge; social influences; environmental context and resource; belief about capabilities; social professional role and identity; and behavioural regulation. Five behavioural domains were identified as overarching barriers: environmental context and resources; knowledge; social influences; belief about consequences; and social professional role and identity. Differences in beliefs between individual health professional groups were identified within the domains: belief about consequences; social professional role and identity; and emotion. Organisational differences were identified within the domains: belief about consequences; social influences; and belief about capabilities. Conclusion This study has identified some of the enablers and barriers to implementation of the New Zealand and Australian Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines using the validated Theoretical Domains Framework, as perceived by health professionals. We have identified differences between individual health professional groups and organisations. The identification of these behavioural determinants can be used to enhance an implementation strategy, assist in the design of interventions to achieve improved implementation and facilitate process evaluations to understand why or how change interventions are effective.
topic Implementation
Clinical practice guidelines
Antenatal corticosteroids
Theoretical domains framework
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-016-1858-8
work_keys_str_mv AT elmcgoldrick identifyingthebarriersandenablersintheimplementationofthenewzealandandaustralianantenatalcorticosteroidclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT tcrawford identifyingthebarriersandenablersintheimplementationofthenewzealandandaustralianantenatalcorticosteroidclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT jabrown identifyingthebarriersandenablersintheimplementationofthenewzealandandaustralianantenatalcorticosteroidclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT kmgroom identifyingthebarriersandenablersintheimplementationofthenewzealandandaustralianantenatalcorticosteroidclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT cacrowther identifyingthebarriersandenablersintheimplementationofthenewzealandandaustralianantenatalcorticosteroidclinicalpracticeguidelines
_version_ 1725354512189751296