Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales
Abstract The planetary boundaries framework defines the “safe operating space for humanity” represented by nine global processes that can destabilize the Earth System if perturbed. The water planetary boundary attempts to provide a global limit to anthropogenic water cycle modifications, but it has...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Earth's Future |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001377 |
id |
doaj-82624fdf50634774ba34d17e08a67ef7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-82624fdf50634774ba34d17e08a67ef72020-11-25T02:38:44ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth's Future2328-42772020-02-0182n/an/a10.1029/2019EF001377Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global ScalesSamuel C. Zipper0Fernando Jaramillo1Lan Wang‐Erlandsson2Sarah E. Cornell3Tom Gleeson4Miina Porkka5Tiina Häyhä6Anne‐Sophie Crépin7Ingo Fetzer8Dieter Gerten9Holger Hoff10Nathanial Matthews11Constanza Ricaurte‐Villota12Matti Kummu13Yoshihide Wada14Line Gordon15Kansas Geological Survey University of Kansas Lawrence KS USADepartment of Physical Geography Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Civil Engineering University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia CanadaStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association Potsdam GermanyPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association Potsdam GermanyGlobal Resilience Partnership Stockholm SwedenInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras “José Benito Vives de Andreis” Santa Marta ColombiaWater and Development Research Group Aalto University Espoo FinlandInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Laxenburg AustriaStockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm SwedenAbstract The planetary boundaries framework defines the “safe operating space for humanity” represented by nine global processes that can destabilize the Earth System if perturbed. The water planetary boundary attempts to provide a global limit to anthropogenic water cycle modifications, but it has been challenging to translate and apply it to the regional and local scales at which water problems and management typically occur. We develop a cross‐scale approach by which the water planetary boundary could guide sustainable water management and governance at subglobal contexts defined by physical features (e.g., watershed or aquifer), political borders (e.g., city, nation, or group of nations), or commercial entities (e.g., corporation, trade group, or financial institution). The application of the water planetary boundary at these subglobal contexts occurs via two approaches: (i) calculating fair shares, in which local water cycle modifications are compared to that context's allocation of the global safe operating space, taking into account biophysical, socioeconomic, and ethical considerations; and (ii) defining a local safe operating space, in which interactions between water stores and Earth System components are used to define local boundaries required for sustaining the local water system in stable conditions, which we demonstrate with a case study of the Cienaga Grande de Santa Marta wetlands in Colombia. By harmonizing these two approaches, the water planetary boundary can ensure that water cycle modifications remain within both local and global boundaries and complement existing water management and governance approaches.https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001377water managementEarth Systemscross‐scalewater cycleAnthropoceneplanetary boundaries |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Samuel C. Zipper Fernando Jaramillo Lan Wang‐Erlandsson Sarah E. Cornell Tom Gleeson Miina Porkka Tiina Häyhä Anne‐Sophie Crépin Ingo Fetzer Dieter Gerten Holger Hoff Nathanial Matthews Constanza Ricaurte‐Villota Matti Kummu Yoshihide Wada Line Gordon |
spellingShingle |
Samuel C. Zipper Fernando Jaramillo Lan Wang‐Erlandsson Sarah E. Cornell Tom Gleeson Miina Porkka Tiina Häyhä Anne‐Sophie Crépin Ingo Fetzer Dieter Gerten Holger Hoff Nathanial Matthews Constanza Ricaurte‐Villota Matti Kummu Yoshihide Wada Line Gordon Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales Earth's Future water management Earth Systems cross‐scale water cycle Anthropocene planetary boundaries |
author_facet |
Samuel C. Zipper Fernando Jaramillo Lan Wang‐Erlandsson Sarah E. Cornell Tom Gleeson Miina Porkka Tiina Häyhä Anne‐Sophie Crépin Ingo Fetzer Dieter Gerten Holger Hoff Nathanial Matthews Constanza Ricaurte‐Villota Matti Kummu Yoshihide Wada Line Gordon |
author_sort |
Samuel C. Zipper |
title |
Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales |
title_short |
Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales |
title_full |
Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales |
title_fullStr |
Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales |
title_full_unstemmed |
Integrating the Water Planetary Boundary With Water Management From Local to Global Scales |
title_sort |
integrating the water planetary boundary with water management from local to global scales |
publisher |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
series |
Earth's Future |
issn |
2328-4277 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Abstract The planetary boundaries framework defines the “safe operating space for humanity” represented by nine global processes that can destabilize the Earth System if perturbed. The water planetary boundary attempts to provide a global limit to anthropogenic water cycle modifications, but it has been challenging to translate and apply it to the regional and local scales at which water problems and management typically occur. We develop a cross‐scale approach by which the water planetary boundary could guide sustainable water management and governance at subglobal contexts defined by physical features (e.g., watershed or aquifer), political borders (e.g., city, nation, or group of nations), or commercial entities (e.g., corporation, trade group, or financial institution). The application of the water planetary boundary at these subglobal contexts occurs via two approaches: (i) calculating fair shares, in which local water cycle modifications are compared to that context's allocation of the global safe operating space, taking into account biophysical, socioeconomic, and ethical considerations; and (ii) defining a local safe operating space, in which interactions between water stores and Earth System components are used to define local boundaries required for sustaining the local water system in stable conditions, which we demonstrate with a case study of the Cienaga Grande de Santa Marta wetlands in Colombia. By harmonizing these two approaches, the water planetary boundary can ensure that water cycle modifications remain within both local and global boundaries and complement existing water management and governance approaches. |
topic |
water management Earth Systems cross‐scale water cycle Anthropocene planetary boundaries |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001377 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT samuelczipper integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT fernandojaramillo integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT lanwangerlandsson integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT sarahecornell integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT tomgleeson integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT miinaporkka integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT tiinahayha integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT annesophiecrepin integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT ingofetzer integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT dietergerten integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT holgerhoff integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT nathanialmatthews integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT constanzaricaurtevillota integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT mattikummu integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT yoshihidewada integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales AT linegordon integratingthewaterplanetaryboundarywithwatermanagementfromlocaltoglobalscales |
_version_ |
1724790024389525504 |