Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models

In this paper the accuracy of 6 spatial interpolation methods on geoid grid models are tested and compared: Inverse Distance Weighting, Kriging, Minimum Curvature, Natural Neighbour, Radial Basis Function and Moving Average. Grid models are derived from three global geopotential models: EGM2008, EIG...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marko Radanović, Tomislav Bašić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije) 2018-03-01
Series:Geodetski Vestnik
Subjects:
Online Access:http://geodetski-vestnik.com/62/1/gv62-1_radanovic.pdf
id doaj-827c96e0368b4ac99b8044f6b1a6b534
record_format Article
spelling doaj-827c96e0368b4ac99b8044f6b1a6b5342020-11-24T22:09:20Zeng Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije) Geodetski Vestnik0351-02711581-13282018-03-01621687810.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2018.01.68-78Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid modelsMarko Radanović0Tomislav Bašić1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Geodesy, Kačićeva 26, HR-10000 Zagreb, CroatiaUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Geodesy, Kačićeva 26, HR-10000 Zagreb, CroatiaIn this paper the accuracy of 6 spatial interpolation methods on geoid grid models are tested and compared: Inverse Distance Weighting, Kriging, Minimum Curvature, Natural Neighbour, Radial Basis Function and Moving Average. Grid models are derived from three global geopotential models: EGM2008, EIGEN-6C4 and GECO. Totally 18 geoid models in forms of equiangular grid models are created in GoldenSoftware Surfer 13 for this purpose, by combining 6 methods of interpolation and 3 global models, whose size and position cover a wide area of Croatia with parts of neighbouring countries. Default interpolation parameters were kept during the process. Models were created in a way that modelled values of geoid undulations can be subtracted from undulations of independent models in equal points. Residuals calculated in this way served as a base for quality assessment. Comparative analysis of quality indicators, statistics and graphical indicators of residuals led to a conclusion that the best-fitted methods of interpolation for this specific case are Radial Basis Function, Kriging, and Natural Neighbour, in that order.http://geodetski-vestnik.com/62/1/gv62-1_radanovic.pdfgeoidgeoid modelspatial interpolationglobal geopotential modelinterpolationCroatia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marko Radanović
Tomislav Bašić
spellingShingle Marko Radanović
Tomislav Bašić
Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models
Geodetski Vestnik
geoid
geoid model
spatial interpolation
global geopotential model
interpolation
Croatia
author_facet Marko Radanović
Tomislav Bašić
author_sort Marko Radanović
title Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models
title_short Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models
title_full Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models
title_fullStr Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models
title_sort accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models
publisher Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije)
series Geodetski Vestnik
issn 0351-0271
1581-1328
publishDate 2018-03-01
description In this paper the accuracy of 6 spatial interpolation methods on geoid grid models are tested and compared: Inverse Distance Weighting, Kriging, Minimum Curvature, Natural Neighbour, Radial Basis Function and Moving Average. Grid models are derived from three global geopotential models: EGM2008, EIGEN-6C4 and GECO. Totally 18 geoid models in forms of equiangular grid models are created in GoldenSoftware Surfer 13 for this purpose, by combining 6 methods of interpolation and 3 global models, whose size and position cover a wide area of Croatia with parts of neighbouring countries. Default interpolation parameters were kept during the process. Models were created in a way that modelled values of geoid undulations can be subtracted from undulations of independent models in equal points. Residuals calculated in this way served as a base for quality assessment. Comparative analysis of quality indicators, statistics and graphical indicators of residuals led to a conclusion that the best-fitted methods of interpolation for this specific case are Radial Basis Function, Kriging, and Natural Neighbour, in that order.
topic geoid
geoid model
spatial interpolation
global geopotential model
interpolation
Croatia
url http://geodetski-vestnik.com/62/1/gv62-1_radanovic.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT markoradanovic accuracyassessmentandcomparisonofinterpolationmethodsongeoidmodels
AT tomislavbasic accuracyassessmentandcomparisonofinterpolationmethodsongeoidmodels
_version_ 1725812458452418560