Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models
In this paper the accuracy of 6 spatial interpolation methods on geoid grid models are tested and compared: Inverse Distance Weighting, Kriging, Minimum Curvature, Natural Neighbour, Radial Basis Function and Moving Average. Grid models are derived from three global geopotential models: EGM2008, EIG...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije)
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Geodetski Vestnik |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://geodetski-vestnik.com/62/1/gv62-1_radanovic.pdf |
id |
doaj-827c96e0368b4ac99b8044f6b1a6b534 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-827c96e0368b4ac99b8044f6b1a6b5342020-11-24T22:09:20Zeng Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije) Geodetski Vestnik0351-02711581-13282018-03-01621687810.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2018.01.68-78Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid modelsMarko Radanović0Tomislav Bašić1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Geodesy, Kačićeva 26, HR-10000 Zagreb, CroatiaUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Geodesy, Kačićeva 26, HR-10000 Zagreb, CroatiaIn this paper the accuracy of 6 spatial interpolation methods on geoid grid models are tested and compared: Inverse Distance Weighting, Kriging, Minimum Curvature, Natural Neighbour, Radial Basis Function and Moving Average. Grid models are derived from three global geopotential models: EGM2008, EIGEN-6C4 and GECO. Totally 18 geoid models in forms of equiangular grid models are created in GoldenSoftware Surfer 13 for this purpose, by combining 6 methods of interpolation and 3 global models, whose size and position cover a wide area of Croatia with parts of neighbouring countries. Default interpolation parameters were kept during the process. Models were created in a way that modelled values of geoid undulations can be subtracted from undulations of independent models in equal points. Residuals calculated in this way served as a base for quality assessment. Comparative analysis of quality indicators, statistics and graphical indicators of residuals led to a conclusion that the best-fitted methods of interpolation for this specific case are Radial Basis Function, Kriging, and Natural Neighbour, in that order.http://geodetski-vestnik.com/62/1/gv62-1_radanovic.pdfgeoidgeoid modelspatial interpolationglobal geopotential modelinterpolationCroatia |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marko Radanović Tomislav Bašić |
spellingShingle |
Marko Radanović Tomislav Bašić Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models Geodetski Vestnik geoid geoid model spatial interpolation global geopotential model interpolation Croatia |
author_facet |
Marko Radanović Tomislav Bašić |
author_sort |
Marko Radanović |
title |
Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models |
title_short |
Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models |
title_full |
Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models |
title_fullStr |
Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models |
title_sort |
accuracy assessment and comparison of interpolation methods on geoid models |
publisher |
Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije) |
series |
Geodetski Vestnik |
issn |
0351-0271 1581-1328 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
In this paper the accuracy of 6 spatial interpolation methods on geoid grid models are tested and compared: Inverse Distance Weighting, Kriging, Minimum Curvature, Natural Neighbour, Radial Basis Function and Moving Average. Grid models are derived from three global geopotential models: EGM2008, EIGEN-6C4 and GECO. Totally 18 geoid models in forms of equiangular grid models are created in GoldenSoftware Surfer 13 for this purpose, by combining 6 methods of interpolation and 3 global models, whose size and position cover a wide area of Croatia with parts of neighbouring countries. Default interpolation parameters were kept during the process. Models were created in a way that modelled values of geoid undulations can be subtracted from undulations of independent models in equal points. Residuals calculated in this way served as a base for quality assessment. Comparative analysis of quality indicators, statistics and graphical indicators of residuals led to a conclusion that the best-fitted methods of interpolation for this specific case are Radial Basis Function, Kriging, and Natural Neighbour, in that order. |
topic |
geoid geoid model spatial interpolation global geopotential model interpolation Croatia |
url |
http://geodetski-vestnik.com/62/1/gv62-1_radanovic.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markoradanovic accuracyassessmentandcomparisonofinterpolationmethodsongeoidmodels AT tomislavbasic accuracyassessmentandcomparisonofinterpolationmethodsongeoidmodels |
_version_ |
1725812458452418560 |