Arbitration Practice of Recognitionand Administration of the Execution of Foreign Arbitration Decisionsin the Russian Federation

The Author considers the process of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral decision on economic disputes in the Russian Federation in order to identify problems arising in arbitration proceedings in the performance of foreign arbitral decision. Characteristic features of application of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: L. M. Churkina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Omsk Law Academy 2018-06-01
Series:Сибирское юридическое обозрение
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/31
id doaj-828d6853b7e94f33b76d685b60ccfdf8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-828d6853b7e94f33b76d685b60ccfdf82021-07-09T07:14:33ZrusOmsk Law AcademyСибирское юридическое обозрение2658-76022658-76102018-06-0115216316710.19073/2306-1340-2018-15-2-163-16730Arbitration Practice of Recognitionand Administration of the Execution of Foreign Arbitration Decisionsin the Russian FederationL. M. Churkina0Urals State Economic UniversityThe Author considers the process of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral decision on economic disputes in the Russian Federation in order to identify problems arising in arbitration proceedings in the performance of foreign arbitral decision. Characteristic features of application of the international multilateral treaties ratified by the Russian Federation and regulating process of recognition and enforcement of the foreign arbitration decision are allocated and described. The article analyzes other grounds for recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral decision, except for international treaties. The article substantiates the idea that the Russian arbitration practice in the category of cases specified in the article is in the process of development and improvement. On the basis of the research, the Author concludes that at present Russian arbitration courts often refer to the principle of international courtesy and the principle of reciprocity in considering the application of companies for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral decision in economic disputes. The issue of procedural features related to the provision of evidence to ensure the principle of reciprocity continues to be debated.https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/31foreign judgmentsnew york convention 1958hague convention 1965minsk convention 1993supreme arbitration court of the russian federationprinciple of international courtesyprinciple of reciprocity
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. M. Churkina
spellingShingle L. M. Churkina
Arbitration Practice of Recognitionand Administration of the Execution of Foreign Arbitration Decisionsin the Russian Federation
Сибирское юридическое обозрение
foreign judgments
new york convention 1958
hague convention 1965
minsk convention 1993
supreme arbitration court of the russian federation
principle of international courtesy
principle of reciprocity
author_facet L. M. Churkina
author_sort L. M. Churkina
title Arbitration Practice of Recognitionand Administration of the Execution of Foreign Arbitration Decisionsin the Russian Federation
title_short Arbitration Practice of Recognitionand Administration of the Execution of Foreign Arbitration Decisionsin the Russian Federation
title_full Arbitration Practice of Recognitionand Administration of the Execution of Foreign Arbitration Decisionsin the Russian Federation
title_fullStr Arbitration Practice of Recognitionand Administration of the Execution of Foreign Arbitration Decisionsin the Russian Federation
title_full_unstemmed Arbitration Practice of Recognitionand Administration of the Execution of Foreign Arbitration Decisionsin the Russian Federation
title_sort arbitration practice of recognitionand administration of the execution of foreign arbitration decisionsin the russian federation
publisher Omsk Law Academy
series Сибирское юридическое обозрение
issn 2658-7602
2658-7610
publishDate 2018-06-01
description The Author considers the process of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral decision on economic disputes in the Russian Federation in order to identify problems arising in arbitration proceedings in the performance of foreign arbitral decision. Characteristic features of application of the international multilateral treaties ratified by the Russian Federation and regulating process of recognition and enforcement of the foreign arbitration decision are allocated and described. The article analyzes other grounds for recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral decision, except for international treaties. The article substantiates the idea that the Russian arbitration practice in the category of cases specified in the article is in the process of development and improvement. On the basis of the research, the Author concludes that at present Russian arbitration courts often refer to the principle of international courtesy and the principle of reciprocity in considering the application of companies for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral decision in economic disputes. The issue of procedural features related to the provision of evidence to ensure the principle of reciprocity continues to be debated.
topic foreign judgments
new york convention 1958
hague convention 1965
minsk convention 1993
supreme arbitration court of the russian federation
principle of international courtesy
principle of reciprocity
url https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/31
work_keys_str_mv AT lmchurkina arbitrationpracticeofrecognitionandadministrationoftheexecutionofforeignarbitrationdecisionsintherussianfederation
_version_ 1721311630064615424