Accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastoma

Abstract Background Current standard of treatment for newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is surgical resection with adjuvant normofractionated radiotherapy (NFRT) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HFRT) which was known as an opti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victor Lewitzki, Rainer J. Klement, Rebekka Kosmala, Dominik Lisowski, Michael Flentje, Bülent Polat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1427-5
id doaj-828e7a9ae2fd48509af4043f6b79b824
record_format Article
spelling doaj-828e7a9ae2fd48509af4043f6b79b8242020-12-13T12:41:30ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2019-12-0114111010.1186/s13014-019-1427-5Accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastomaVictor Lewitzki0Rainer J. Klement1Rebekka Kosmala2Dominik Lisowski3Michael Flentje4Bülent Polat5Department of Radiation Oncology, University of WürzburgDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital SchweinfurtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of WürzburgDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of WürzburgDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of WürzburgDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of WürzburgAbstract Background Current standard of treatment for newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is surgical resection with adjuvant normofractionated radiotherapy (NFRT) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HFRT) which was known as an option from randomized controlled trials before the temozolomide era has not been compared to the standard therapy in a randomized setting combined with TMZ. Methods Data of 152 patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated from 10/2004 until 7/2018 at a single tertiary care institution were extracted from a clinical database and retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-eight patients treated with NFRT of 60 Gy in 30 fractions (34 with simultaneous and 2 with sequential TMZ) were compared to 114 patients treated with HFRT of 54.0 Gy in 30 fraction of 1.8 Gy twice daily (109 with simultaneous and 3 with sequential TMZ). The association between treatment protocol and other variables with overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis; the latter was performed using variables selected by the LASSO method. Results Median overall survival (OS) was 20.3 month for the entire cohort. For patients treated with NFRT median OS was 24.4 months compared to 18.5 months in patients treated with HFRT (p = 0.131). In univariable regression analysis the use of dexamethasone during radiotherapy had a significant negative impact on OS in both patient groups, HR 2.21 (95% CI 1.47–3.31, p = 0.0001). In multivariable analysis adjusted for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl-transferase (MGMT) promotor methylation status, salvage treatment and secondary GBM, the use of dexamethasone was still a negative prognostic factor, HR 1.95 (95% CI 1.21–3.13, p = 0.006). Positive MGMT-methylation status and salvage treatment were highly significant positive prognostic factors. There was no strong association between treatment protocol and OS (p = 0.504). Conclusions Our retrospective analysis supports the hypothesis of equivalence between HFRT and the standard protocol of treatment for GBM. For those patients who are willing to obtain the benefit of shortening the course of radiochemotherapy, HFRT may be an alternative with comparable efficacy although it was not yet tested in a large prospective randomized study against the current standard. The positive influence of salvage therapy and negative impact of concomitant use of corticosteroids should be addressed in future prospective trials. To confirm our results, we plan to perform a pooled analysis with other tertiary clinics in order to achieve better statistical reliability.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1427-5Brain cancerGlioblastomaHigh grade gliomaRadiotherapyTemozolomideCorticosteroids
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Victor Lewitzki
Rainer J. Klement
Rebekka Kosmala
Dominik Lisowski
Michael Flentje
Bülent Polat
spellingShingle Victor Lewitzki
Rainer J. Klement
Rebekka Kosmala
Dominik Lisowski
Michael Flentje
Bülent Polat
Accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastoma
Radiation Oncology
Brain cancer
Glioblastoma
High grade glioma
Radiotherapy
Temozolomide
Corticosteroids
author_facet Victor Lewitzki
Rainer J. Klement
Rebekka Kosmala
Dominik Lisowski
Michael Flentje
Bülent Polat
author_sort Victor Lewitzki
title Accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastoma
title_short Accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastoma
title_full Accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastoma
title_fullStr Accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastoma
title_sort accelerated hyperfractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide is equivalent to normofractionated radiochemotherapy in a retrospective analysis of patients with glioblastoma
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Background Current standard of treatment for newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is surgical resection with adjuvant normofractionated radiotherapy (NFRT) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HFRT) which was known as an option from randomized controlled trials before the temozolomide era has not been compared to the standard therapy in a randomized setting combined with TMZ. Methods Data of 152 patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated from 10/2004 until 7/2018 at a single tertiary care institution were extracted from a clinical database and retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-eight patients treated with NFRT of 60 Gy in 30 fractions (34 with simultaneous and 2 with sequential TMZ) were compared to 114 patients treated with HFRT of 54.0 Gy in 30 fraction of 1.8 Gy twice daily (109 with simultaneous and 3 with sequential TMZ). The association between treatment protocol and other variables with overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis; the latter was performed using variables selected by the LASSO method. Results Median overall survival (OS) was 20.3 month for the entire cohort. For patients treated with NFRT median OS was 24.4 months compared to 18.5 months in patients treated with HFRT (p = 0.131). In univariable regression analysis the use of dexamethasone during radiotherapy had a significant negative impact on OS in both patient groups, HR 2.21 (95% CI 1.47–3.31, p = 0.0001). In multivariable analysis adjusted for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl-transferase (MGMT) promotor methylation status, salvage treatment and secondary GBM, the use of dexamethasone was still a negative prognostic factor, HR 1.95 (95% CI 1.21–3.13, p = 0.006). Positive MGMT-methylation status and salvage treatment were highly significant positive prognostic factors. There was no strong association between treatment protocol and OS (p = 0.504). Conclusions Our retrospective analysis supports the hypothesis of equivalence between HFRT and the standard protocol of treatment for GBM. For those patients who are willing to obtain the benefit of shortening the course of radiochemotherapy, HFRT may be an alternative with comparable efficacy although it was not yet tested in a large prospective randomized study against the current standard. The positive influence of salvage therapy and negative impact of concomitant use of corticosteroids should be addressed in future prospective trials. To confirm our results, we plan to perform a pooled analysis with other tertiary clinics in order to achieve better statistical reliability.
topic Brain cancer
Glioblastoma
High grade glioma
Radiotherapy
Temozolomide
Corticosteroids
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1427-5
work_keys_str_mv AT victorlewitzki acceleratedhyperfractionatedradiochemotherapywithtemozolomideisequivalenttonormofractionatedradiochemotherapyinaretrospectiveanalysisofpatientswithglioblastoma
AT rainerjklement acceleratedhyperfractionatedradiochemotherapywithtemozolomideisequivalenttonormofractionatedradiochemotherapyinaretrospectiveanalysisofpatientswithglioblastoma
AT rebekkakosmala acceleratedhyperfractionatedradiochemotherapywithtemozolomideisequivalenttonormofractionatedradiochemotherapyinaretrospectiveanalysisofpatientswithglioblastoma
AT dominiklisowski acceleratedhyperfractionatedradiochemotherapywithtemozolomideisequivalenttonormofractionatedradiochemotherapyinaretrospectiveanalysisofpatientswithglioblastoma
AT michaelflentje acceleratedhyperfractionatedradiochemotherapywithtemozolomideisequivalenttonormofractionatedradiochemotherapyinaretrospectiveanalysisofpatientswithglioblastoma
AT bulentpolat acceleratedhyperfractionatedradiochemotherapywithtemozolomideisequivalenttonormofractionatedradiochemotherapyinaretrospectiveanalysisofpatientswithglioblastoma
_version_ 1724384315020673024