Patient information role in integrated health care

Background: Integrated patient-centered care is a call for fundamental shift in how health care services are delivered as it is believed to improve patient outcomes and experience. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are powerful tools as they p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José M Quintana, Maria João Forjaz, Itziar Vergara, Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi, Noemí Robles, Antonio Sarría-Santamera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2019-08-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijic.org/articles/5101
id doaj-82a5b995291d466fbd26b363448acc33
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82a5b995291d466fbd26b363448acc332020-11-25T02:03:48ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562019-08-0119410.5334/ijic.s33504468Patient information role in integrated health careJosé M Quintana0Maria João Forjaz1Itziar Vergara2Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi3Noemí Robles4Antonio Sarría-Santamera5Hospital Galdakao-UsansoloENS-ISCIIIUnidad Investigacion APOSIS Gipuzkoa, OsakidetzaAxentiva SolutionsUniversitat Oberta de CatalunyaENS-ISCIIIBackground: Integrated patient-centered care is a call for fundamental shift in how health care services are delivered as it is believed to improve patient outcomes and experience. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are powerful tools as they provide validated information on patient's perception. REDISSEC, the Spanish Research Network on Health Services Research on Chronic Patients, is developing various projects on this field. Aims and Objectives: The workshop will cover three objectives: Provide an overview of the use of PROMs and PREMS in different situations and patient’s profile. Reflect on their advantages and disadvantages, problems or limitations. Discuss how to incorporate them into clinical practice in an integration health care environment. Format: Total duration: 1h. Each speaker will have 8 minutes for presenting, and 20 min for a final joint discussion, following this schedule: Contents / Time: Welcome to the workshop. Chair: Jose Maria Quintana. Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo. 0 min “Patient centered outcomes in multimorbidity: quality of life, comorbidity and other issues” Maria João Forjaz. ENS-ISCIII. This talk will focus in the problem of multimorbidity (MM), the importance of measuring PRO in MM, including quality of life and comorbidity scales. 8 min “The measure of functionality in elder adults: benefits and challenges”. Itziar Vergara. Unidad Investigacion APOSIS Gipuzkoa, Osakidetza. Being function a complex construct, a number of questions arise: what measures are the most appropriate?  How has to be explored considering clinical settings? Are health professionals trained to do so? 16 min “Measuring health-related quality of life with the EQ-5D instruments: how-to for clinicians and decision makers” Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi. Axentiva Solutions. The EQ-5D instrument is especially relevant in the care of chronic patients where integrated care is essential for effective and efficient patient management. 24 min “Priorization of PROMs in the assessment of the quality of health care provided to chronic patients”. Noemí Robles. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. In this talk we will review how PROMs have been prioritised in the design of the assessment strategies through four research projects undertaken during the period 2013-2018. 32 min “Measuring satisfaction with Primary Care: the perspective of patients in 7 European Countries” Antonio Sarría-Santamera. ENS-ISCIII. The EUPRIMECARE project developed an instrument to measure satisfaction with Primary Care (PC), which was applied in 7 EU countries. Factors related to greater satisfaction with PC were: age, visits to a specialist, having a PC doctor and higher intensity of diagnostic & control performed in PC. 40 min Joint discussion: Participants: Speakers and audience Target audience: Researchers, clinicians and managers who are engaged in the design and delivery of integrated care. Learnings/Take away: What are the advantages and disadvantages when using PROMs and PREMs in clinical practice and in integrated care. What are the advances in specific fields as fragility or multimorbidity. How to use and interpret the results of these tools in real life.https://www.ijic.org/articles/5101patient reported outcomepatient reported experiencehealth care integration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author José M Quintana
Maria João Forjaz
Itziar Vergara
Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi
Noemí Robles
Antonio Sarría-Santamera
spellingShingle José M Quintana
Maria João Forjaz
Itziar Vergara
Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi
Noemí Robles
Antonio Sarría-Santamera
Patient information role in integrated health care
International Journal of Integrated Care
patient reported outcome
patient reported experience
health care integration
author_facet José M Quintana
Maria João Forjaz
Itziar Vergara
Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi
Noemí Robles
Antonio Sarría-Santamera
author_sort José M Quintana
title Patient information role in integrated health care
title_short Patient information role in integrated health care
title_full Patient information role in integrated health care
title_fullStr Patient information role in integrated health care
title_full_unstemmed Patient information role in integrated health care
title_sort patient information role in integrated health care
publisher Ubiquity Press
series International Journal of Integrated Care
issn 1568-4156
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Background: Integrated patient-centered care is a call for fundamental shift in how health care services are delivered as it is believed to improve patient outcomes and experience. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are powerful tools as they provide validated information on patient's perception. REDISSEC, the Spanish Research Network on Health Services Research on Chronic Patients, is developing various projects on this field. Aims and Objectives: The workshop will cover three objectives: Provide an overview of the use of PROMs and PREMS in different situations and patient’s profile. Reflect on their advantages and disadvantages, problems or limitations. Discuss how to incorporate them into clinical practice in an integration health care environment. Format: Total duration: 1h. Each speaker will have 8 minutes for presenting, and 20 min for a final joint discussion, following this schedule: Contents / Time: Welcome to the workshop. Chair: Jose Maria Quintana. Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo. 0 min “Patient centered outcomes in multimorbidity: quality of life, comorbidity and other issues” Maria João Forjaz. ENS-ISCIII. This talk will focus in the problem of multimorbidity (MM), the importance of measuring PRO in MM, including quality of life and comorbidity scales. 8 min “The measure of functionality in elder adults: benefits and challenges”. Itziar Vergara. Unidad Investigacion APOSIS Gipuzkoa, Osakidetza. Being function a complex construct, a number of questions arise: what measures are the most appropriate?  How has to be explored considering clinical settings? Are health professionals trained to do so? 16 min “Measuring health-related quality of life with the EQ-5D instruments: how-to for clinicians and decision makers” Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi. Axentiva Solutions. The EQ-5D instrument is especially relevant in the care of chronic patients where integrated care is essential for effective and efficient patient management. 24 min “Priorization of PROMs in the assessment of the quality of health care provided to chronic patients”. Noemí Robles. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. In this talk we will review how PROMs have been prioritised in the design of the assessment strategies through four research projects undertaken during the period 2013-2018. 32 min “Measuring satisfaction with Primary Care: the perspective of patients in 7 European Countries” Antonio Sarría-Santamera. ENS-ISCIII. The EUPRIMECARE project developed an instrument to measure satisfaction with Primary Care (PC), which was applied in 7 EU countries. Factors related to greater satisfaction with PC were: age, visits to a specialist, having a PC doctor and higher intensity of diagnostic & control performed in PC. 40 min Joint discussion: Participants: Speakers and audience Target audience: Researchers, clinicians and managers who are engaged in the design and delivery of integrated care. Learnings/Take away: What are the advantages and disadvantages when using PROMs and PREMs in clinical practice and in integrated care. What are the advances in specific fields as fragility or multimorbidity. How to use and interpret the results of these tools in real life.
topic patient reported outcome
patient reported experience
health care integration
url https://www.ijic.org/articles/5101
work_keys_str_mv AT josemquintana patientinformationroleinintegratedhealthcare
AT mariajoaoforjaz patientinformationroleinintegratedhealthcare
AT itziarvergara patientinformationroleinintegratedhealthcare
AT juanmanuelramosgoni patientinformationroleinintegratedhealthcare
AT noemirobles patientinformationroleinintegratedhealthcare
AT antoniosarriasantamera patientinformationroleinintegratedhealthcare
_version_ 1724945764039262208