The episodicity of verbal reports of personally significant autobiographical memories: Vividness correlates with narrative text quality more than with detailedness or memory specificity

How can we tell from a memory report whether a memory is episodic or not? Vividness is required by many definitions, whereas detailedness, memory specificity, and narrative text type are competing definitions of episodicity used in research. We explored their correlations with vividness in personall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tilmann eHabermas, Verena eDiel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00110/full
id doaj-82a5c67e215e40b68114581812f36f34
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82a5c67e215e40b68114581812f36f342020-11-24T22:29:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532013-08-01710.3389/fnbeh.2013.0011052656The episodicity of verbal reports of personally significant autobiographical memories: Vividness correlates with narrative text quality more than with detailedness or memory specificityTilmann eHabermas0Verena eDiel1Verena eDiel2Goethe UniversityGoethe UniversityDeutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische ForschungHow can we tell from a memory report whether a memory is episodic or not? Vividness is required by many definitions, whereas detailedness, memory specificity, and narrative text type are competing definitions of episodicity used in research. We explored their correlations with vividness in personally significant autobiographical memories to provide evidence to support their relative claim to define episodic memories. In addition, we explored differences between different memory types and text types as well as between memories with different valences. We asked a lifespan sample (N = 168) of 8-, 12-, 16-, 20-, 40-, and 65-year-olds of both genders (N = 27, 29, 27, 27, 28, 30) to provide brief oral life narratives. These were segmented into thematic memory units. Detailedness of person, place, and time did not correlate with each other or either vividness, memory specificity, or narrative text type. Narrative text type, in contrast, correlated both with vividness and memory specificity, suggesting narrative text type as a good criterion of episodicity. Emotionality turned out to be an even better predictor of vividness. Also, differences between narrative, chronicle, and argument text types and between specific versus more extended and atemporal memory were explored as well as differences between positive, negative, ambivalent, neutral, contamination, and redemption memory reports. It is concluded that temporal sequentiality is a central characteristic of episodic autobiographical memories. Furthermore, it is suggested that the textual quality of memory reports should be taken more seriously, and that evaluation and interpretation are inherent aspects of personally significant memories.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00110/fullNarrativeepisodic memoryautobiographical memoryvividnesslife storymemory specificity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tilmann eHabermas
Verena eDiel
Verena eDiel
spellingShingle Tilmann eHabermas
Verena eDiel
Verena eDiel
The episodicity of verbal reports of personally significant autobiographical memories: Vividness correlates with narrative text quality more than with detailedness or memory specificity
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Narrative
episodic memory
autobiographical memory
vividness
life story
memory specificity
author_facet Tilmann eHabermas
Verena eDiel
Verena eDiel
author_sort Tilmann eHabermas
title The episodicity of verbal reports of personally significant autobiographical memories: Vividness correlates with narrative text quality more than with detailedness or memory specificity
title_short The episodicity of verbal reports of personally significant autobiographical memories: Vividness correlates with narrative text quality more than with detailedness or memory specificity
title_full The episodicity of verbal reports of personally significant autobiographical memories: Vividness correlates with narrative text quality more than with detailedness or memory specificity
title_fullStr The episodicity of verbal reports of personally significant autobiographical memories: Vividness correlates with narrative text quality more than with detailedness or memory specificity
title_full_unstemmed The episodicity of verbal reports of personally significant autobiographical memories: Vividness correlates with narrative text quality more than with detailedness or memory specificity
title_sort episodicity of verbal reports of personally significant autobiographical memories: vividness correlates with narrative text quality more than with detailedness or memory specificity
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
issn 1662-5153
publishDate 2013-08-01
description How can we tell from a memory report whether a memory is episodic or not? Vividness is required by many definitions, whereas detailedness, memory specificity, and narrative text type are competing definitions of episodicity used in research. We explored their correlations with vividness in personally significant autobiographical memories to provide evidence to support their relative claim to define episodic memories. In addition, we explored differences between different memory types and text types as well as between memories with different valences. We asked a lifespan sample (N = 168) of 8-, 12-, 16-, 20-, 40-, and 65-year-olds of both genders (N = 27, 29, 27, 27, 28, 30) to provide brief oral life narratives. These were segmented into thematic memory units. Detailedness of person, place, and time did not correlate with each other or either vividness, memory specificity, or narrative text type. Narrative text type, in contrast, correlated both with vividness and memory specificity, suggesting narrative text type as a good criterion of episodicity. Emotionality turned out to be an even better predictor of vividness. Also, differences between narrative, chronicle, and argument text types and between specific versus more extended and atemporal memory were explored as well as differences between positive, negative, ambivalent, neutral, contamination, and redemption memory reports. It is concluded that temporal sequentiality is a central characteristic of episodic autobiographical memories. Furthermore, it is suggested that the textual quality of memory reports should be taken more seriously, and that evaluation and interpretation are inherent aspects of personally significant memories.
topic Narrative
episodic memory
autobiographical memory
vividness
life story
memory specificity
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00110/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tilmannehabermas theepisodicityofverbalreportsofpersonallysignificantautobiographicalmemoriesvividnesscorrelateswithnarrativetextqualitymorethanwithdetailednessormemoryspecificity
AT verenaediel theepisodicityofverbalreportsofpersonallysignificantautobiographicalmemoriesvividnesscorrelateswithnarrativetextqualitymorethanwithdetailednessormemoryspecificity
AT verenaediel theepisodicityofverbalreportsofpersonallysignificantautobiographicalmemoriesvividnesscorrelateswithnarrativetextqualitymorethanwithdetailednessormemoryspecificity
AT tilmannehabermas episodicityofverbalreportsofpersonallysignificantautobiographicalmemoriesvividnesscorrelateswithnarrativetextqualitymorethanwithdetailednessormemoryspecificity
AT verenaediel episodicityofverbalreportsofpersonallysignificantautobiographicalmemoriesvividnesscorrelateswithnarrativetextqualitymorethanwithdetailednessormemoryspecificity
AT verenaediel episodicityofverbalreportsofpersonallysignificantautobiographicalmemoriesvividnesscorrelateswithnarrativetextqualitymorethanwithdetailednessormemoryspecificity
_version_ 1725743048096219136