Association of Mobile Instant Messaging Chat Group Participation With Family Functioning and Well-Being: Population-Based Cross-sectional Study

BackgroundConvenient and quality family communication improves family functioning and well-being. Using mobile instant messaging (IM) for family communication is increasingly popular, but its association with family functioning and family well-being has not been reported....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao, Sheng Zhi, Luk, Tzu Tsun, Guo, Ningyuan, Wang, Man Ping, Lai, Agnes Yuen Kwan, Wong, Bonny Yee Man, Fong, Daniel Yee Tak, Chan, Sophia Siu Chee, Lam, Tai Hing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:https://www.jmir.org/2021/3/e18876
id doaj-82b414e4b8b3486d8d8a05fc6b084e69
record_format Article
spelling doaj-82b414e4b8b3486d8d8a05fc6b084e692021-04-02T20:37:18ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712021-03-01233e1887610.2196/18876Association of Mobile Instant Messaging Chat Group Participation With Family Functioning and Well-Being: Population-Based Cross-sectional StudyZhao, Sheng ZhiLuk, Tzu TsunGuo, NingyuanWang, Man PingLai, Agnes Yuen KwanWong, Bonny Yee ManFong, Daniel Yee TakChan, Sophia Siu CheeLam, Tai Hing BackgroundConvenient and quality family communication improves family functioning and well-being. Using mobile instant messaging (IM) for family communication is increasingly popular, but its association with family functioning and family well-being has not been reported. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the association of the use of family IM chat groups with family functioning and well-being, and the mediating effect of family communication quality among Chinese adults in Hong Kong. MethodsWe analyzed data from the Family and Health Information Trend Survey (FHInTS), a territory-wide, probability-based telephone survey conducted in 2017. The quality of family communication, family functioning, and well-being was assessed using the Family Communication Scale; Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (APGAR) Scale; and Family Well-Being Scale (family heath, harmony, and happiness), respectively. Respondents also reported the number of family IM chat groups (0, 1, 2, ≥3), and numbers of IM messages received (<1, 1-2, 3-10, 11-20, >20) and sent (<1, 1-2, 3-10, 11-20, >20) daily. The frequency of family IM chat interaction (range 0-8) was calculated by combining the number of messages received from and sent to the family IM chat groups daily. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics and the frequency of family face-to-face communication (often, sometimes, seldom, or never). Data were weighted by sex, age, and education of the general population. Adjusted β coefficients of family functioning and well-being in relation to having a family IM chat group, and numbers of messages received and sent were calculated. The mediation effects of family communication on these associations were assessed, controlling for the covariates. ResultsA random sample of 1638 Chinese adults (45.6% men; 78.1% aged 25 to 64 years) were interviewed (response rate: 74.4%). Female, younger age, being married or cohabiting, higher education, higher income, better family functioning, and well-being were associated with having at least one family IM chat group (all P<.01). Higher scores of family communication, family APGAR, and family well-being were associated with having more family IM chat groups and more messages received from and sent to family IM chat groups daily (all P for trend <.01). More frequent family IM chat interaction was associated with higher scores of family communication, family APGAR, and family well-being (β=.16-.83, all P for trend <.001). The associations of family IM chat interaction with family functioning and well-being were moderately (51.0%-59.6%) mediated by family communication. ConclusionsUse of a family IM chat group was associated with higher family functioning and well-being, and the association was partially mediated by family communication.https://www.jmir.org/2021/3/e18876
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhao, Sheng Zhi
Luk, Tzu Tsun
Guo, Ningyuan
Wang, Man Ping
Lai, Agnes Yuen Kwan
Wong, Bonny Yee Man
Fong, Daniel Yee Tak
Chan, Sophia Siu Chee
Lam, Tai Hing
spellingShingle Zhao, Sheng Zhi
Luk, Tzu Tsun
Guo, Ningyuan
Wang, Man Ping
Lai, Agnes Yuen Kwan
Wong, Bonny Yee Man
Fong, Daniel Yee Tak
Chan, Sophia Siu Chee
Lam, Tai Hing
Association of Mobile Instant Messaging Chat Group Participation With Family Functioning and Well-Being: Population-Based Cross-sectional Study
Journal of Medical Internet Research
author_facet Zhao, Sheng Zhi
Luk, Tzu Tsun
Guo, Ningyuan
Wang, Man Ping
Lai, Agnes Yuen Kwan
Wong, Bonny Yee Man
Fong, Daniel Yee Tak
Chan, Sophia Siu Chee
Lam, Tai Hing
author_sort Zhao, Sheng Zhi
title Association of Mobile Instant Messaging Chat Group Participation With Family Functioning and Well-Being: Population-Based Cross-sectional Study
title_short Association of Mobile Instant Messaging Chat Group Participation With Family Functioning and Well-Being: Population-Based Cross-sectional Study
title_full Association of Mobile Instant Messaging Chat Group Participation With Family Functioning and Well-Being: Population-Based Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Association of Mobile Instant Messaging Chat Group Participation With Family Functioning and Well-Being: Population-Based Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Association of Mobile Instant Messaging Chat Group Participation With Family Functioning and Well-Being: Population-Based Cross-sectional Study
title_sort association of mobile instant messaging chat group participation with family functioning and well-being: population-based cross-sectional study
publisher JMIR Publications
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
issn 1438-8871
publishDate 2021-03-01
description BackgroundConvenient and quality family communication improves family functioning and well-being. Using mobile instant messaging (IM) for family communication is increasingly popular, but its association with family functioning and family well-being has not been reported. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the association of the use of family IM chat groups with family functioning and well-being, and the mediating effect of family communication quality among Chinese adults in Hong Kong. MethodsWe analyzed data from the Family and Health Information Trend Survey (FHInTS), a territory-wide, probability-based telephone survey conducted in 2017. The quality of family communication, family functioning, and well-being was assessed using the Family Communication Scale; Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (APGAR) Scale; and Family Well-Being Scale (family heath, harmony, and happiness), respectively. Respondents also reported the number of family IM chat groups (0, 1, 2, ≥3), and numbers of IM messages received (<1, 1-2, 3-10, 11-20, >20) and sent (<1, 1-2, 3-10, 11-20, >20) daily. The frequency of family IM chat interaction (range 0-8) was calculated by combining the number of messages received from and sent to the family IM chat groups daily. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics and the frequency of family face-to-face communication (often, sometimes, seldom, or never). Data were weighted by sex, age, and education of the general population. Adjusted β coefficients of family functioning and well-being in relation to having a family IM chat group, and numbers of messages received and sent were calculated. The mediation effects of family communication on these associations were assessed, controlling for the covariates. ResultsA random sample of 1638 Chinese adults (45.6% men; 78.1% aged 25 to 64 years) were interviewed (response rate: 74.4%). Female, younger age, being married or cohabiting, higher education, higher income, better family functioning, and well-being were associated with having at least one family IM chat group (all P<.01). Higher scores of family communication, family APGAR, and family well-being were associated with having more family IM chat groups and more messages received from and sent to family IM chat groups daily (all P for trend <.01). More frequent family IM chat interaction was associated with higher scores of family communication, family APGAR, and family well-being (β=.16-.83, all P for trend <.001). The associations of family IM chat interaction with family functioning and well-being were moderately (51.0%-59.6%) mediated by family communication. ConclusionsUse of a family IM chat group was associated with higher family functioning and well-being, and the association was partially mediated by family communication.
url https://www.jmir.org/2021/3/e18876
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoshengzhi associationofmobileinstantmessagingchatgroupparticipationwithfamilyfunctioningandwellbeingpopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT luktzutsun associationofmobileinstantmessagingchatgroupparticipationwithfamilyfunctioningandwellbeingpopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT guoningyuan associationofmobileinstantmessagingchatgroupparticipationwithfamilyfunctioningandwellbeingpopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT wangmanping associationofmobileinstantmessagingchatgroupparticipationwithfamilyfunctioningandwellbeingpopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT laiagnesyuenkwan associationofmobileinstantmessagingchatgroupparticipationwithfamilyfunctioningandwellbeingpopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT wongbonnyyeeman associationofmobileinstantmessagingchatgroupparticipationwithfamilyfunctioningandwellbeingpopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT fongdanielyeetak associationofmobileinstantmessagingchatgroupparticipationwithfamilyfunctioningandwellbeingpopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT chansophiasiuchee associationofmobileinstantmessagingchatgroupparticipationwithfamilyfunctioningandwellbeingpopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT lamtaihing associationofmobileinstantmessagingchatgroupparticipationwithfamilyfunctioningandwellbeingpopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1721546898979946496