Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Review of the Options, Indications, and Outcomes

Cardiogenic shock remains a challenging disease entity and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be implemented in an acute setting to stabilize acutely ill patients with cardiomyopathy in a variety of clinical situations. Currentl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nisha A. Gilotra, Gerin R. Stevens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-01-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S15718
id doaj-8316475c633142ad86d079cbece030ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8316475c633142ad86d079cbece030ae2020-11-25T02:50:13ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology1179-54682014-01-018s110.4137/CMC.S15718Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Review of the Options, Indications, and OutcomesNisha A. Gilotra0Gerin R. Stevens1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.Mechanical Circulatory Support Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.Cardiogenic shock remains a challenging disease entity and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be implemented in an acute setting to stabilize acutely ill patients with cardiomyopathy in a variety of clinical situations. Currently, several options exist for temporary MCS. We review the indications, contraindications, clinical applications, and evidences for a variety of temporary circulatory support options, including the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), CentriMag blood pump, and percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs), specifically the TandemHeart and Impella.https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S15718
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nisha A. Gilotra
Gerin R. Stevens
spellingShingle Nisha A. Gilotra
Gerin R. Stevens
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Review of the Options, Indications, and Outcomes
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
author_facet Nisha A. Gilotra
Gerin R. Stevens
author_sort Nisha A. Gilotra
title Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Review of the Options, Indications, and Outcomes
title_short Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Review of the Options, Indications, and Outcomes
title_full Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Review of the Options, Indications, and Outcomes
title_fullStr Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Review of the Options, Indications, and Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Review of the Options, Indications, and Outcomes
title_sort temporary mechanical circulatory support: a review of the options, indications, and outcomes
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
issn 1179-5468
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Cardiogenic shock remains a challenging disease entity and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be implemented in an acute setting to stabilize acutely ill patients with cardiomyopathy in a variety of clinical situations. Currently, several options exist for temporary MCS. We review the indications, contraindications, clinical applications, and evidences for a variety of temporary circulatory support options, including the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), CentriMag blood pump, and percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs), specifically the TandemHeart and Impella.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S15718
work_keys_str_mv AT nishaagilotra temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportareviewoftheoptionsindicationsandoutcomes
AT gerinrstevens temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportareviewoftheoptionsindicationsandoutcomes
_version_ 1724739150054162432