Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

There are inconsistent results regarding the efficacy and safety of intermittent epidural bolus (IPB) versus continuous epidural infusions (CPI) for labor analgesia. This study used a meta-analytic approach to assess the safety and treatment efficacy of IPB versus CPI for labor analgesia based on ra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xian Liu, Huan Zhang, Haijing Zhang, Mengzhuo Guo, Yuanchao Gao, Chunyan Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234353
id doaj-83188e31cff042769a8e78fca33b2b98
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83188e31cff042769a8e78fca33b2b982021-03-03T21:51:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023435310.1371/journal.pone.0234353Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Xian LiuHuan ZhangHaijing ZhangMengzhuo GuoYuanchao GaoChunyan DuThere are inconsistent results regarding the efficacy and safety of intermittent epidural bolus (IPB) versus continuous epidural infusions (CPI) for labor analgesia. This study used a meta-analytic approach to assess the safety and treatment efficacy of IPB versus CPI for labor analgesia based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four electronic databases were used to identify eligible RCTs. Pooled effect estimates at 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Twenty-two RCTs with 2,573 parturients were selected for final analysis. The findings revealed no significant differences between IPB and CPI for the incidences of cesarean and instrumental delivery. IPB was shown to be associated with shorter total duration of labor [weighted mean difference (WMD): -21.46; 95% CI: -25.07 to -17.85; P < 0.001], duration of the first of stage of labor (WMD: -13.41; 95% CI: -21.01 to -5.81; P = 0.001), and duration of the second stage of labor (WMD: -4.98; 95% CI: -9.32 to -0.63; P = 0.025). Furthermore, IPB significantly reduced the incidences of required anesthetic interventions compared with CPI [relative risk (RR): 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39-0.95; P = 0.030], whereas there was no significant difference between IPB and CPI for the time required in the first anesthetic intervention (WMD: 7.73; 95% CI: -33.68-49.15; P = 0.714). The local anesthetic IPB (bupivacaine equivalents) was associated with lower milligrams per hour of local anesthetic (WMD: -0.89; 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.36; P = 0.001) and better maternal satisfaction (WMD: 8.76; 95% CI: 4.18-13.35; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between IPB and CPI for the risk of adverse events. This study found that parturients with IPB have short total duration of labor and duration of the first and second stage of labor, reduced requirements for additional anesthetic interventions, and improved maternal satisfaction.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234353
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xian Liu
Huan Zhang
Haijing Zhang
Mengzhuo Guo
Yuanchao Gao
Chunyan Du
spellingShingle Xian Liu
Huan Zhang
Haijing Zhang
Mengzhuo Guo
Yuanchao Gao
Chunyan Du
Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Xian Liu
Huan Zhang
Haijing Zhang
Mengzhuo Guo
Yuanchao Gao
Chunyan Du
author_sort Xian Liu
title Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_short Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_fullStr Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_sort intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description There are inconsistent results regarding the efficacy and safety of intermittent epidural bolus (IPB) versus continuous epidural infusions (CPI) for labor analgesia. This study used a meta-analytic approach to assess the safety and treatment efficacy of IPB versus CPI for labor analgesia based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four electronic databases were used to identify eligible RCTs. Pooled effect estimates at 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Twenty-two RCTs with 2,573 parturients were selected for final analysis. The findings revealed no significant differences between IPB and CPI for the incidences of cesarean and instrumental delivery. IPB was shown to be associated with shorter total duration of labor [weighted mean difference (WMD): -21.46; 95% CI: -25.07 to -17.85; P < 0.001], duration of the first of stage of labor (WMD: -13.41; 95% CI: -21.01 to -5.81; P = 0.001), and duration of the second stage of labor (WMD: -4.98; 95% CI: -9.32 to -0.63; P = 0.025). Furthermore, IPB significantly reduced the incidences of required anesthetic interventions compared with CPI [relative risk (RR): 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39-0.95; P = 0.030], whereas there was no significant difference between IPB and CPI for the time required in the first anesthetic intervention (WMD: 7.73; 95% CI: -33.68-49.15; P = 0.714). The local anesthetic IPB (bupivacaine equivalents) was associated with lower milligrams per hour of local anesthetic (WMD: -0.89; 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.36; P = 0.001) and better maternal satisfaction (WMD: 8.76; 95% CI: 4.18-13.35; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between IPB and CPI for the risk of adverse events. This study found that parturients with IPB have short total duration of labor and duration of the first and second stage of labor, reduced requirements for additional anesthetic interventions, and improved maternal satisfaction.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234353
work_keys_str_mv AT xianliu intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huanzhang intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT haijingzhang intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mengzhuoguo intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yuanchaogao intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chunyandu intermittentepiduralbolusversuscontinuousepiduralinfusionsforlaboranalgesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1714814689179860992