Secrecy, Betrayal and Crime
In the past few years numerous secret transgressions and crimes have been revealed in the media. Whistleblowers reveal clandestine agreements between managers and directors of large companies; criminals (pentiti) make deals with criminal justice officials; cyclists and athletes make public confessio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University School of Law
2011-10-01
|
Series: | Utrecht Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.173/ |
id |
doaj-8336afc341e445b1a75e2b4cefc35af2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8336afc341e445b1a75e2b4cefc35af22020-11-25T03:57:43ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2011-10-017310711910.18352/ulr.173168Secrecy, Betrayal and CrimeDina Siegel0Utrecht University School of LawIn the past few years numerous secret transgressions and crimes have been revealed in the media. Whistleblowers reveal clandestine agreements between managers and directors of large companies; criminals (pentiti) make deals with criminal justice officials; cyclists and athletes make public confessions about drug use; victims of sexual abuse come forward with their testimonies. In this paper, I try to analyze why attitudes about secrecy have changed in the last couple of decades and how and why so many secrets have been revealed, either by individuals who are complicit (whistleblowers or cyclists), by victims (of child abuse by the Catholic clergy) and by outsiders (WikiLeaks activists). In addition, some suggestions on the methods of criminological research in closed and isolated groups which consider such information leaks a form of betrayal are provided.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.173/secrecyrisk societyparticipant observationtrustcriminal culture |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dina Siegel |
spellingShingle |
Dina Siegel Secrecy, Betrayal and Crime Utrecht Law Review secrecy risk society participant observation trust criminal culture |
author_facet |
Dina Siegel |
author_sort |
Dina Siegel |
title |
Secrecy, Betrayal and Crime |
title_short |
Secrecy, Betrayal and Crime |
title_full |
Secrecy, Betrayal and Crime |
title_fullStr |
Secrecy, Betrayal and Crime |
title_full_unstemmed |
Secrecy, Betrayal and Crime |
title_sort |
secrecy, betrayal and crime |
publisher |
Utrecht University School of Law |
series |
Utrecht Law Review |
issn |
1871-515X |
publishDate |
2011-10-01 |
description |
In the past few years numerous secret transgressions and crimes have been revealed in the media. Whistleblowers reveal clandestine agreements between managers and directors of large companies; criminals (pentiti) make deals with criminal justice officials; cyclists and athletes make public confessions about drug use; victims of sexual abuse come forward with their testimonies. In this paper, I try to analyze why attitudes about secrecy have changed in the last couple of decades and how and why so many secrets have been revealed, either by individuals who are complicit (whistleblowers or cyclists), by victims (of child abuse by the Catholic clergy) and by outsiders (WikiLeaks activists). In addition, some suggestions on the methods of criminological research in closed and isolated groups which consider such information leaks a form of betrayal are provided. |
topic |
secrecy risk society participant observation trust criminal culture |
url |
http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.173/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dinasiegel secrecybetrayalandcrime |
_version_ |
1724459117306707968 |