Biased representation of disturbance rates in the roadside sampling frame in boreal forests: implications for monitoring design

The North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) is the principal source of data to inform researchers about the status of and trend for boreal forest birds. Unfortunately, little BBS coverage is available in the boreal forest, where increasing concern over the status of species breeding there has incr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven L. Van Wilgenburg, Elizabeth M. Beck, Brennan Obermayer, Timothy Joyce, Brett Weddle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2015-12-01
Series:Avian Conservation and Ecology
Subjects:
BBS
Online Access:http://www.ace-eco.org/vol10/iss2/art5/
id doaj-8338bc08a618458ea96157f4c17d42b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8338bc08a618458ea96157f4c17d42b92020-11-25T00:16:14ZengResilience AllianceAvian Conservation and Ecology1712-65682015-12-01102510.5751/ACE-00777-100205777Biased representation of disturbance rates in the roadside sampling frame in boreal forests: implications for monitoring designSteven L. Van Wilgenburg0Elizabeth M. Beck1Brennan Obermayer2Timothy Joyce3Brett Weddle4Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife ServiceEnvironment Canada, Canadian Wildlife ServiceSir Sanford Fleming CollegeSir Sanford Fleming CollegeSir Sanford Fleming CollegeThe North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) is the principal source of data to inform researchers about the status of and trend for boreal forest birds. Unfortunately, little BBS coverage is available in the boreal forest, where increasing concern over the status of species breeding there has increased interest in northward expansion of the BBS. However, high disturbance rates in the boreal forest may complicate roadside monitoring. If the roadside sampling frame does not capture variation in disturbance rates because of either road placement or the use of roads for resource extraction, biased trend estimates might result. In this study, we examined roadside bias in the proportional representation of habitat disturbance via spatial data on forest "loss," forest fires, and anthropogenic disturbance. In each of 455 BBS routes, the area disturbed within multiple buffers away from the road was calculated and compared against the area disturbed in degree blocks and BBS strata. We found a nonlinear relationship between bias and distance from the road, suggesting forest loss and forest fires were underrepresented below 75 and 100 m, respectively. In contrast, anthropogenic disturbance was overrepresented at distances below 500 m and underrepresented thereafter. After accounting for distance from road, BBS routes were reasonably representative of the degree blocks they were within, with only a few strata showing biased representation. In general, anthropogenic disturbance is overrepresented in southern strata, and forest fires are underrepresented in almost all strata. Similar biases exist when comparing the entire road network and the subset sampled by BBS routes against the amount of disturbance within BBS strata; however, the magnitude of biases differed. Based on our results, we recommend that spatial stratification and rotating panel designs be used to spread limited BBS and off-road sampling effort in an unbiased fashion and that new BBS routes be established where sufficient road coverage exists.http://www.ace-eco.org/vol10/iss2/art5/BBSbiasboreal forestdisturbanceforest fireNorth American Breeding Bird Surveyroadside sampling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steven L. Van Wilgenburg
Elizabeth M. Beck
Brennan Obermayer
Timothy Joyce
Brett Weddle
spellingShingle Steven L. Van Wilgenburg
Elizabeth M. Beck
Brennan Obermayer
Timothy Joyce
Brett Weddle
Biased representation of disturbance rates in the roadside sampling frame in boreal forests: implications for monitoring design
Avian Conservation and Ecology
BBS
bias
boreal forest
disturbance
forest fire
North American Breeding Bird Survey
roadside sampling
author_facet Steven L. Van Wilgenburg
Elizabeth M. Beck
Brennan Obermayer
Timothy Joyce
Brett Weddle
author_sort Steven L. Van Wilgenburg
title Biased representation of disturbance rates in the roadside sampling frame in boreal forests: implications for monitoring design
title_short Biased representation of disturbance rates in the roadside sampling frame in boreal forests: implications for monitoring design
title_full Biased representation of disturbance rates in the roadside sampling frame in boreal forests: implications for monitoring design
title_fullStr Biased representation of disturbance rates in the roadside sampling frame in boreal forests: implications for monitoring design
title_full_unstemmed Biased representation of disturbance rates in the roadside sampling frame in boreal forests: implications for monitoring design
title_sort biased representation of disturbance rates in the roadside sampling frame in boreal forests: implications for monitoring design
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Avian Conservation and Ecology
issn 1712-6568
publishDate 2015-12-01
description The North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) is the principal source of data to inform researchers about the status of and trend for boreal forest birds. Unfortunately, little BBS coverage is available in the boreal forest, where increasing concern over the status of species breeding there has increased interest in northward expansion of the BBS. However, high disturbance rates in the boreal forest may complicate roadside monitoring. If the roadside sampling frame does not capture variation in disturbance rates because of either road placement or the use of roads for resource extraction, biased trend estimates might result. In this study, we examined roadside bias in the proportional representation of habitat disturbance via spatial data on forest "loss," forest fires, and anthropogenic disturbance. In each of 455 BBS routes, the area disturbed within multiple buffers away from the road was calculated and compared against the area disturbed in degree blocks and BBS strata. We found a nonlinear relationship between bias and distance from the road, suggesting forest loss and forest fires were underrepresented below 75 and 100 m, respectively. In contrast, anthropogenic disturbance was overrepresented at distances below 500 m and underrepresented thereafter. After accounting for distance from road, BBS routes were reasonably representative of the degree blocks they were within, with only a few strata showing biased representation. In general, anthropogenic disturbance is overrepresented in southern strata, and forest fires are underrepresented in almost all strata. Similar biases exist when comparing the entire road network and the subset sampled by BBS routes against the amount of disturbance within BBS strata; however, the magnitude of biases differed. Based on our results, we recommend that spatial stratification and rotating panel designs be used to spread limited BBS and off-road sampling effort in an unbiased fashion and that new BBS routes be established where sufficient road coverage exists.
topic BBS
bias
boreal forest
disturbance
forest fire
North American Breeding Bird Survey
roadside sampling
url http://www.ace-eco.org/vol10/iss2/art5/
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenlvanwilgenburg biasedrepresentationofdisturbanceratesintheroadsidesamplingframeinborealforestsimplicationsformonitoringdesign
AT elizabethmbeck biasedrepresentationofdisturbanceratesintheroadsidesamplingframeinborealforestsimplicationsformonitoringdesign
AT brennanobermayer biasedrepresentationofdisturbanceratesintheroadsidesamplingframeinborealforestsimplicationsformonitoringdesign
AT timothyjoyce biasedrepresentationofdisturbanceratesintheroadsidesamplingframeinborealforestsimplicationsformonitoringdesign
AT brettweddle biasedrepresentationofdisturbanceratesintheroadsidesamplingframeinborealforestsimplicationsformonitoringdesign
_version_ 1716197355024285696