Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding

<p>Abstract</p> <p>The effect of non-random mating on genetic response was compared for populations with discrete generations. Mating followed a selection step where the average coancestry of selected animals was constrained, while genetic response was maximised. Minimum coancestry...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meuwissen Theo HE, Sonesson Anna K
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: BMC 2000-05-01
Series:Genetics Selection Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.gsejournal.org/content/32/3/231
id doaj-83446f2f75af496ab242226ffb1940cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83446f2f75af496ab242226ffb1940cd2020-11-24T21:53:27ZdeuBMCGenetics Selection Evolution0999-193X1297-96862000-05-0132323124810.1186/1297-9686-32-3-231Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreedingMeuwissen Theo HESonesson Anna K<p>Abstract</p> <p>The effect of non-random mating on genetic response was compared for populations with discrete generations. Mating followed a selection step where the average coancestry of selected animals was constrained, while genetic response was maximised. Minimum coancestry (MC), Minimum coancestry with a maximum of one offspring per mating pair (MC1) and Minimum variance of the relationships of offspring (MVRO) mating schemes resulted in a delay in inbreeding of about two generations compared with Random, Random factorial and Compensatory mating. In these breeding schemes where selection constrains the rate of inbreeding, ΔF, the improved family structure due to non-random mating increased genetic response. For schemes with ΔF constrained to 1.0% and 100 selection candidates, genetic response was 22% higher for the MC1 and MVRO schemes compared with Random mating schemes. For schemes with a less stringent constraint on ΔF or more selection candidates, the superiority of the MC1 and MVRO schemes was smaller (5–6%). In general, MC1 seemed to be the preferred mating method, since it almost always yielded the highest genetic response. MC1 mainly achieved these high genetic responses by avoiding extreme relationships among the offspring, <it>i.e</it>. fullsib offspring are avoided, and by making the contributions of ancestors to offspring more equal by mating least related animals.</p> http://www.gsejournal.org/content/32/3/231breeding programinbreedingselectionmatinggenetic response
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Meuwissen Theo HE
Sonesson Anna K
spellingShingle Meuwissen Theo HE
Sonesson Anna K
Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding
Genetics Selection Evolution
breeding program
inbreeding
selection
mating
genetic response
author_facet Meuwissen Theo HE
Sonesson Anna K
author_sort Meuwissen Theo HE
title Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding
title_short Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding
title_full Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding
title_fullStr Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding
title_full_unstemmed Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding
title_sort mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding
publisher BMC
series Genetics Selection Evolution
issn 0999-193X
1297-9686
publishDate 2000-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>The effect of non-random mating on genetic response was compared for populations with discrete generations. Mating followed a selection step where the average coancestry of selected animals was constrained, while genetic response was maximised. Minimum coancestry (MC), Minimum coancestry with a maximum of one offspring per mating pair (MC1) and Minimum variance of the relationships of offspring (MVRO) mating schemes resulted in a delay in inbreeding of about two generations compared with Random, Random factorial and Compensatory mating. In these breeding schemes where selection constrains the rate of inbreeding, ΔF, the improved family structure due to non-random mating increased genetic response. For schemes with ΔF constrained to 1.0% and 100 selection candidates, genetic response was 22% higher for the MC1 and MVRO schemes compared with Random mating schemes. For schemes with a less stringent constraint on ΔF or more selection candidates, the superiority of the MC1 and MVRO schemes was smaller (5–6%). In general, MC1 seemed to be the preferred mating method, since it almost always yielded the highest genetic response. MC1 mainly achieved these high genetic responses by avoiding extreme relationships among the offspring, <it>i.e</it>. fullsib offspring are avoided, and by making the contributions of ancestors to offspring more equal by mating least related animals.</p>
topic breeding program
inbreeding
selection
mating
genetic response
url http://www.gsejournal.org/content/32/3/231
work_keys_str_mv AT meuwissentheohe matingschemesforoptimumcontributionselectionwithconstrainedratesofinbreeding
AT sonessonannak matingschemesforoptimumcontributionselectionwithconstrainedratesofinbreeding
_version_ 1725872165033607168