The Impact of Human–Robot Synchronization on Anthropomorphization

To elucidate the working mechanism behind anthropomorphism, this study investigated whether human participants would anthropomorphize a robot more if they move synchronously versus non-synchronously with it, and whether this is affected by which of the two initiates the movements. We tested two comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saskia Heijnen, Roy de Kleijn, Bernhard Hommel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02607/full
id doaj-8347c593b61b4ecfb8b9aeb691b8130b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8347c593b61b4ecfb8b9aeb691b8130b2020-11-24T23:05:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-01-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.02607408999The Impact of Human–Robot Synchronization on AnthropomorphizationSaskia Heijnen0Saskia Heijnen1Roy de Kleijn2Roy de Kleijn3Bernhard Hommel4Bernhard Hommel5Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, NetherlandsLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, NetherlandsCognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, NetherlandsLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, NetherlandsCognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, NetherlandsLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, NetherlandsTo elucidate the working mechanism behind anthropomorphism, this study investigated whether human participants would anthropomorphize a robot more if they move synchronously versus non-synchronously with it, and whether this is affected by which of the two initiates the movements. We tested two competing hypotheses. The feature-overlap hypothesis predicts that moving in synchrony would increase perceived self-other feature overlap, which in turn might spread activation to codes of features related to humans—which should increase anthropomorphization. In contrast, the autonomy hypothesis predicts that unpredictability increases anthropomorphization, and thus that whenever the robot initiates movements, or when the human initiates movements to which the robot moves non-synchronously, there is an increased perception of the robot as a more human-like, intentionally acting creature, which in turn should increase anthropomorphization. We performed a study with synchrony as within-subjects factor, and initiator (robot or human) as between-subjects factor. To study the impact of synchrony on self-other overlap and perception of human likeness, participants completed two tasks that served as implicit measures of state anthropomorphization, and two questionnaires that served as explicit measures of state anthropomorphization toward the robot. The two implicit measures were the joint Simon task and one-shot Dictator Game. Additionally, participants filled in a trait anthropomorphization questionnaire, to enable correction for baseline tendencies to anthropomorphize. The synchrony manipulation did not affect the joint Simon effect, although there was an effect on average reaction time (RT), where in the group in which the robot initiated the movement, RTs were slower when the human and robot moved non-synchronously. The Dictator Game offer and the state anthropomorphization questionnaires were not affected by the synchrony manipulation. There was, however, a positive correlation between current anthropomorphization of the robot and amount of money offered to it. Given that most measures were not systematically affected by our manipulation, it appears that either our design was suboptimal, or that synchronization does not affect the anthropomorphization of a robot.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02607/fullanthropomorphizationrobotsynchronySimon taskDictator Gameimitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saskia Heijnen
Saskia Heijnen
Roy de Kleijn
Roy de Kleijn
Bernhard Hommel
Bernhard Hommel
spellingShingle Saskia Heijnen
Saskia Heijnen
Roy de Kleijn
Roy de Kleijn
Bernhard Hommel
Bernhard Hommel
The Impact of Human–Robot Synchronization on Anthropomorphization
Frontiers in Psychology
anthropomorphization
robot
synchrony
Simon task
Dictator Game
imitation
author_facet Saskia Heijnen
Saskia Heijnen
Roy de Kleijn
Roy de Kleijn
Bernhard Hommel
Bernhard Hommel
author_sort Saskia Heijnen
title The Impact of Human–Robot Synchronization on Anthropomorphization
title_short The Impact of Human–Robot Synchronization on Anthropomorphization
title_full The Impact of Human–Robot Synchronization on Anthropomorphization
title_fullStr The Impact of Human–Robot Synchronization on Anthropomorphization
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Human–Robot Synchronization on Anthropomorphization
title_sort impact of human–robot synchronization on anthropomorphization
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-01-01
description To elucidate the working mechanism behind anthropomorphism, this study investigated whether human participants would anthropomorphize a robot more if they move synchronously versus non-synchronously with it, and whether this is affected by which of the two initiates the movements. We tested two competing hypotheses. The feature-overlap hypothesis predicts that moving in synchrony would increase perceived self-other feature overlap, which in turn might spread activation to codes of features related to humans—which should increase anthropomorphization. In contrast, the autonomy hypothesis predicts that unpredictability increases anthropomorphization, and thus that whenever the robot initiates movements, or when the human initiates movements to which the robot moves non-synchronously, there is an increased perception of the robot as a more human-like, intentionally acting creature, which in turn should increase anthropomorphization. We performed a study with synchrony as within-subjects factor, and initiator (robot or human) as between-subjects factor. To study the impact of synchrony on self-other overlap and perception of human likeness, participants completed two tasks that served as implicit measures of state anthropomorphization, and two questionnaires that served as explicit measures of state anthropomorphization toward the robot. The two implicit measures were the joint Simon task and one-shot Dictator Game. Additionally, participants filled in a trait anthropomorphization questionnaire, to enable correction for baseline tendencies to anthropomorphize. The synchrony manipulation did not affect the joint Simon effect, although there was an effect on average reaction time (RT), where in the group in which the robot initiated the movement, RTs were slower when the human and robot moved non-synchronously. The Dictator Game offer and the state anthropomorphization questionnaires were not affected by the synchrony manipulation. There was, however, a positive correlation between current anthropomorphization of the robot and amount of money offered to it. Given that most measures were not systematically affected by our manipulation, it appears that either our design was suboptimal, or that synchronization does not affect the anthropomorphization of a robot.
topic anthropomorphization
robot
synchrony
Simon task
Dictator Game
imitation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02607/full
work_keys_str_mv AT saskiaheijnen theimpactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT saskiaheijnen theimpactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT roydekleijn theimpactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT roydekleijn theimpactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT bernhardhommel theimpactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT bernhardhommel theimpactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT saskiaheijnen impactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT saskiaheijnen impactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT roydekleijn impactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT roydekleijn impactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT bernhardhommel impactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
AT bernhardhommel impactofhumanrobotsynchronizationonanthropomorphization
_version_ 1725624502051667968