Remote sensing liana infestation in an aseasonal tropical forest: addressing mismatch in spatial units of analyses

Abstract The ability to accurately assess liana (woody vine) infestation at the landscape level is essential to quantify their impact on carbon dynamics and help inform targeted forest management and conservation action. Remote sensing techniques provide potential solutions for assessing liana infes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chris J. Chandler, Geertje M. F. van der Heijden, Doreen S. Boyd, Mark E. J. Cutler, Hugo Costa, Reuben Nilus, Giles M. Foody
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-09-01
Series:Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.197
id doaj-83875b43278b46d59968f8ac30f34174
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83875b43278b46d59968f8ac30f341742021-09-23T06:41:06ZengWileyRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation2056-34852021-09-017339741010.1002/rse2.197Remote sensing liana infestation in an aseasonal tropical forest: addressing mismatch in spatial units of analysesChris J. Chandler0Geertje M. F. van der Heijden1Doreen S. Boyd2Mark E. J. Cutler3Hugo Costa4Reuben Nilus5Giles M. Foody6School of Geography University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham United KingdomSchool of Geography University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham United KingdomSchool of Geography University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham United KingdomSchool of Social Sciences University of Dundee Dundee United KingdomDireção‐Geral do Território Lisbon 1099‐052 PortugalForestry Department Forest Research Center Sandakan MalaysiaSchool of Geography University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham United KingdomAbstract The ability to accurately assess liana (woody vine) infestation at the landscape level is essential to quantify their impact on carbon dynamics and help inform targeted forest management and conservation action. Remote sensing techniques provide potential solutions for assessing liana infestation at broader spatial scales. However, their use so far has been limited to seasonal forests, where there is a high spectral contrast between lianas and trees. Additionally, the ability to align the spatial units of remotely sensed data with canopy observations of liana infestation requires further attention. We combined airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR data with a neural network machine learning classification to assess the distribution of liana infestation at the landscape‐level across an aseasonal primary forest in Sabah, Malaysia. We tested whether an object‐based classification was more effective at predicting liana infestation when compared to a pixel‐based classification. We found a stronger relationship between predicted and observed liana infestation when using a pixel‐based approach (RMSD = 27.0% ± 0.80) in comparison to an object‐based approach (RMSD = 32.6% ± 4.84). However, there was no significant difference in accuracy for object‐ versus pixel‐based classifications when liana infestation was grouped into three classes; Low [0–30%], Medium [31–69%] and High [70–100%] (McNemar’s χ2 = 0.211, P = 0.65). We demonstrate, for the first time, that remote sensing approaches are effective in accurately assessing liana infestation at a landscape scale in an aseasonal tropical forest. Our results indicate potential limitations in object‐based approaches which require refinement in order to accurately segment imagery across contiguous closed‐canopy forests. We conclude that the decision on whether to use a pixel‐ or object‐based approach may depend on the structure of the forest and the ultimate application of the resulting output. Both approaches will provide a valuable tool to inform effective conservation and forest management.https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.197Hyperspectral imagingliana infestationLiDARneural networkpixel‐based soft classificationsegmentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chris J. Chandler
Geertje M. F. van der Heijden
Doreen S. Boyd
Mark E. J. Cutler
Hugo Costa
Reuben Nilus
Giles M. Foody
spellingShingle Chris J. Chandler
Geertje M. F. van der Heijden
Doreen S. Boyd
Mark E. J. Cutler
Hugo Costa
Reuben Nilus
Giles M. Foody
Remote sensing liana infestation in an aseasonal tropical forest: addressing mismatch in spatial units of analyses
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Hyperspectral imaging
liana infestation
LiDAR
neural network
pixel‐based soft classification
segmentation
author_facet Chris J. Chandler
Geertje M. F. van der Heijden
Doreen S. Boyd
Mark E. J. Cutler
Hugo Costa
Reuben Nilus
Giles M. Foody
author_sort Chris J. Chandler
title Remote sensing liana infestation in an aseasonal tropical forest: addressing mismatch in spatial units of analyses
title_short Remote sensing liana infestation in an aseasonal tropical forest: addressing mismatch in spatial units of analyses
title_full Remote sensing liana infestation in an aseasonal tropical forest: addressing mismatch in spatial units of analyses
title_fullStr Remote sensing liana infestation in an aseasonal tropical forest: addressing mismatch in spatial units of analyses
title_full_unstemmed Remote sensing liana infestation in an aseasonal tropical forest: addressing mismatch in spatial units of analyses
title_sort remote sensing liana infestation in an aseasonal tropical forest: addressing mismatch in spatial units of analyses
publisher Wiley
series Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
issn 2056-3485
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract The ability to accurately assess liana (woody vine) infestation at the landscape level is essential to quantify their impact on carbon dynamics and help inform targeted forest management and conservation action. Remote sensing techniques provide potential solutions for assessing liana infestation at broader spatial scales. However, their use so far has been limited to seasonal forests, where there is a high spectral contrast between lianas and trees. Additionally, the ability to align the spatial units of remotely sensed data with canopy observations of liana infestation requires further attention. We combined airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR data with a neural network machine learning classification to assess the distribution of liana infestation at the landscape‐level across an aseasonal primary forest in Sabah, Malaysia. We tested whether an object‐based classification was more effective at predicting liana infestation when compared to a pixel‐based classification. We found a stronger relationship between predicted and observed liana infestation when using a pixel‐based approach (RMSD = 27.0% ± 0.80) in comparison to an object‐based approach (RMSD = 32.6% ± 4.84). However, there was no significant difference in accuracy for object‐ versus pixel‐based classifications when liana infestation was grouped into three classes; Low [0–30%], Medium [31–69%] and High [70–100%] (McNemar’s χ2 = 0.211, P = 0.65). We demonstrate, for the first time, that remote sensing approaches are effective in accurately assessing liana infestation at a landscape scale in an aseasonal tropical forest. Our results indicate potential limitations in object‐based approaches which require refinement in order to accurately segment imagery across contiguous closed‐canopy forests. We conclude that the decision on whether to use a pixel‐ or object‐based approach may depend on the structure of the forest and the ultimate application of the resulting output. Both approaches will provide a valuable tool to inform effective conservation and forest management.
topic Hyperspectral imaging
liana infestation
LiDAR
neural network
pixel‐based soft classification
segmentation
url https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.197
work_keys_str_mv AT chrisjchandler remotesensinglianainfestationinanaseasonaltropicalforestaddressingmismatchinspatialunitsofanalyses
AT geertjemfvanderheijden remotesensinglianainfestationinanaseasonaltropicalforestaddressingmismatchinspatialunitsofanalyses
AT doreensboyd remotesensinglianainfestationinanaseasonaltropicalforestaddressingmismatchinspatialunitsofanalyses
AT markejcutler remotesensinglianainfestationinanaseasonaltropicalforestaddressingmismatchinspatialunitsofanalyses
AT hugocosta remotesensinglianainfestationinanaseasonaltropicalforestaddressingmismatchinspatialunitsofanalyses
AT reubennilus remotesensinglianainfestationinanaseasonaltropicalforestaddressingmismatchinspatialunitsofanalyses
AT gilesmfoody remotesensinglianainfestationinanaseasonaltropicalforestaddressingmismatchinspatialunitsofanalyses
_version_ 1717370535328874496