Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods
This paper reviews some of the different formulations of the force exerted on a submerged body by the fluid flowing around it. The study is particularly focused on identifying the most appropriate formulations and their inherent assumptions and experimental conditions that fit the current experiment...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli” - INCAS
2011-06-01
|
Series: | INCAS Bulletin |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://bulletin.incas.ro/files/filip_alexandru_v3_is2_full.pdf |
id |
doaj-8397e73ca1a94b438cc213e7d0a6fe9e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8397e73ca1a94b438cc213e7d0a6fe9e2020-11-24T21:41:42ZengNational Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli” - INCASINCAS Bulletin2066-82012247-45282011-06-0132354310.13111/2066-8201.2011.3.2.4Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methodsStelian GALETUSEAlexandru FILIPThis paper reviews some of the different formulations of the force exerted on a submerged body by the fluid flowing around it. The study is particularly focused on identifying the most appropriate formulations and their inherent assumptions and experimental conditions that fit the current experimental techniques. Several force formulations are derived using different assumptions such as finite and infinite domain, simple and double connected domains. The aim was to obtain formulations that can benefit from the data gathered through the particle image velocimetry method, more explicitly the velocity field around the body and its derivatives. The equations were afterwards discussed in terms of their exposure to error magnification due to the limitations of the experimental method and recommendations were made for appropriate situations in which different formulations should be used. In conclusion, all different force formulations are valid and can be used with the Particle Image Velocimetry data but the accuracy of each outcome depends on the problem definition. As a future objective, experimental work should be performed and test the different equations for different flow conditions, steady, unsteady, quasi-steady, and also for different domain ranges.http://bulletin.incas.ro/files/filip_alexandru_v3_is2_full.pdfaerodynamic forcesintrinsic methodsparticle image velocimetryexperimental aerodynamics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stelian GALETUSE Alexandru FILIP |
spellingShingle |
Stelian GALETUSE Alexandru FILIP Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods INCAS Bulletin aerodynamic forces intrinsic methods particle image velocimetry experimental aerodynamics |
author_facet |
Stelian GALETUSE Alexandru FILIP |
author_sort |
Stelian GALETUSE |
title |
Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods |
title_short |
Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods |
title_full |
Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods |
title_fullStr |
Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods |
title_sort |
study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods |
publisher |
National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli” - INCAS |
series |
INCAS Bulletin |
issn |
2066-8201 2247-4528 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
This paper reviews some of the different formulations of the force exerted on a submerged body by the fluid flowing around it. The study is particularly focused on identifying the most appropriate formulations and their inherent assumptions and experimental conditions that fit the current experimental techniques. Several force formulations are derived using different assumptions such as finite and infinite domain, simple and double connected domains. The aim was to obtain formulations that can benefit from the data gathered through the particle image velocimetry method, more explicitly the velocity field around the body and its derivatives. The equations were afterwards discussed in terms of their exposure to error magnification due to the limitations of the experimental method and recommendations were made for appropriate situations in which different formulations should be used. In conclusion, all different force formulations are valid and can be used with the Particle Image Velocimetry data but the accuracy of each outcome depends on the problem definition. As a future objective, experimental work should be performed and test the different equations for different flow conditions, steady, unsteady, quasi-steady, and also for different domain ranges. |
topic |
aerodynamic forces intrinsic methods particle image velocimetry experimental aerodynamics |
url |
http://bulletin.incas.ro/files/filip_alexandru_v3_is2_full.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT steliangaletuse studyoftheaerodynamicforcesevaluationmethods AT alexandrufilip studyoftheaerodynamicforcesevaluationmethods |
_version_ |
1725920380685647872 |