Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods

This paper reviews some of the different formulations of the force exerted on a submerged body by the fluid flowing around it. The study is particularly focused on identifying the most appropriate formulations and their inherent assumptions and experimental conditions that fit the current experiment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stelian GALETUSE, Alexandru FILIP
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli” - INCAS 2011-06-01
Series:INCAS Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:http://bulletin.incas.ro/files/filip_alexandru_v3_is2_full.pdf
id doaj-8397e73ca1a94b438cc213e7d0a6fe9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8397e73ca1a94b438cc213e7d0a6fe9e2020-11-24T21:41:42ZengNational Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli” - INCASINCAS Bulletin2066-82012247-45282011-06-0132354310.13111/2066-8201.2011.3.2.4Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methodsStelian GALETUSEAlexandru FILIPThis paper reviews some of the different formulations of the force exerted on a submerged body by the fluid flowing around it. The study is particularly focused on identifying the most appropriate formulations and their inherent assumptions and experimental conditions that fit the current experimental techniques. Several force formulations are derived using different assumptions such as finite and infinite domain, simple and double connected domains. The aim was to obtain formulations that can benefit from the data gathered through the particle image velocimetry method, more explicitly the velocity field around the body and its derivatives. The equations were afterwards discussed in terms of their exposure to error magnification due to the limitations of the experimental method and recommendations were made for appropriate situations in which different formulations should be used. In conclusion, all different force formulations are valid and can be used with the Particle Image Velocimetry data but the accuracy of each outcome depends on the problem definition. As a future objective, experimental work should be performed and test the different equations for different flow conditions, steady, unsteady, quasi-steady, and also for different domain ranges.http://bulletin.incas.ro/files/filip_alexandru_v3_is2_full.pdfaerodynamic forcesintrinsic methodsparticle image velocimetryexperimental aerodynamics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stelian GALETUSE
Alexandru FILIP
spellingShingle Stelian GALETUSE
Alexandru FILIP
Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods
INCAS Bulletin
aerodynamic forces
intrinsic methods
particle image velocimetry
experimental aerodynamics
author_facet Stelian GALETUSE
Alexandru FILIP
author_sort Stelian GALETUSE
title Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods
title_short Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods
title_full Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods
title_fullStr Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods
title_full_unstemmed Study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods
title_sort study of the aerodynamic forces evaluation methods
publisher National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli” - INCAS
series INCAS Bulletin
issn 2066-8201
2247-4528
publishDate 2011-06-01
description This paper reviews some of the different formulations of the force exerted on a submerged body by the fluid flowing around it. The study is particularly focused on identifying the most appropriate formulations and their inherent assumptions and experimental conditions that fit the current experimental techniques. Several force formulations are derived using different assumptions such as finite and infinite domain, simple and double connected domains. The aim was to obtain formulations that can benefit from the data gathered through the particle image velocimetry method, more explicitly the velocity field around the body and its derivatives. The equations were afterwards discussed in terms of their exposure to error magnification due to the limitations of the experimental method and recommendations were made for appropriate situations in which different formulations should be used. In conclusion, all different force formulations are valid and can be used with the Particle Image Velocimetry data but the accuracy of each outcome depends on the problem definition. As a future objective, experimental work should be performed and test the different equations for different flow conditions, steady, unsteady, quasi-steady, and also for different domain ranges.
topic aerodynamic forces
intrinsic methods
particle image velocimetry
experimental aerodynamics
url http://bulletin.incas.ro/files/filip_alexandru_v3_is2_full.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT steliangaletuse studyoftheaerodynamicforcesevaluationmethods
AT alexandrufilip studyoftheaerodynamicforcesevaluationmethods
_version_ 1725920380685647872