Exploring the Role of Antinuclear Antibody Positivity in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Health Outcomes of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective The objective of this study was to describe differences in the clinical course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are antinuclear antibody (ANA)–positive compared with those who are ANA‐negative. Methods This was a retrospective population‐based cohort study of residents in Olm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sujaytha S. Paknikar, Cynthia S. Crowson, John M. Davis, Uma Thanarajasingam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-06-01
Series:ACR Open Rheumatology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11271
id doaj-839cf531d08f468e917470580aca757f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-839cf531d08f468e917470580aca757f2021-06-16T11:11:45ZengWileyACR Open Rheumatology2578-57452021-06-013642242610.1002/acr2.11271Exploring the Role of Antinuclear Antibody Positivity in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Health Outcomes of Patients With Rheumatoid ArthritisSujaytha S. Paknikar0Cynthia S. Crowson1John M. Davis2Uma Thanarajasingam3Mayo Clinic Rochester MinnesotaMayo Clinic Rochester MinnesotaMayo Clinic Rochester MinnesotaMayo Clinic Rochester MinnesotaObjective The objective of this study was to describe differences in the clinical course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are antinuclear antibody (ANA)–positive compared with those who are ANA‐negative. Methods This was a retrospective population‐based cohort study of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, who first fulfilled 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA in 2009‐2014. Data were collected on first documentation of joint swelling. Data on rheumatoid factor or anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody testing and the ANA level were also collected. Comparisons between groups were performed by using χ2 and rank sum tests. Results In this cohort, 64% of patients were tested for ANA within ±90 days of RA criteria fulfillment. In the161 patients with ANA testing, 25% were ANA‐positive. Patients who were ANA‐positive were younger, female, and less likely to be current smokers. ANA positivity did not differ between patients with RA who were seropositive and seronegative. In seropositive patients who were ANA‐positive, there was an increased time to fulfillment of RA criteria, increased time to treatment with disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and increased likelihood of being treated with hydroxychloroquine as opposed to methotrexate. Other outcomes, including disease activity and mortality, did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion In patients with RA, important differences exist between those who are ANA‐positive and ANA‐negative in terms of time to fulfillment of RA criteria and time to DMARD initiation as well as choice of initial pharmacotherapy. These findings could indicate a difference in clinical presentation or perception of patients with RA who are ANA‐positive. Further research is needed to study the long‐term outcomes of patients with RA who are ANA‐positive.https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11271
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sujaytha S. Paknikar
Cynthia S. Crowson
John M. Davis
Uma Thanarajasingam
spellingShingle Sujaytha S. Paknikar
Cynthia S. Crowson
John M. Davis
Uma Thanarajasingam
Exploring the Role of Antinuclear Antibody Positivity in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Health Outcomes of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
ACR Open Rheumatology
author_facet Sujaytha S. Paknikar
Cynthia S. Crowson
John M. Davis
Uma Thanarajasingam
author_sort Sujaytha S. Paknikar
title Exploring the Role of Antinuclear Antibody Positivity in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Health Outcomes of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short Exploring the Role of Antinuclear Antibody Positivity in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Health Outcomes of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full Exploring the Role of Antinuclear Antibody Positivity in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Health Outcomes of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr Exploring the Role of Antinuclear Antibody Positivity in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Health Outcomes of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Role of Antinuclear Antibody Positivity in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Health Outcomes of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort exploring the role of antinuclear antibody positivity in the diagnosis, treatment, and health outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis
publisher Wiley
series ACR Open Rheumatology
issn 2578-5745
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Objective The objective of this study was to describe differences in the clinical course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are antinuclear antibody (ANA)–positive compared with those who are ANA‐negative. Methods This was a retrospective population‐based cohort study of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, who first fulfilled 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA in 2009‐2014. Data were collected on first documentation of joint swelling. Data on rheumatoid factor or anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody testing and the ANA level were also collected. Comparisons between groups were performed by using χ2 and rank sum tests. Results In this cohort, 64% of patients were tested for ANA within ±90 days of RA criteria fulfillment. In the161 patients with ANA testing, 25% were ANA‐positive. Patients who were ANA‐positive were younger, female, and less likely to be current smokers. ANA positivity did not differ between patients with RA who were seropositive and seronegative. In seropositive patients who were ANA‐positive, there was an increased time to fulfillment of RA criteria, increased time to treatment with disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and increased likelihood of being treated with hydroxychloroquine as opposed to methotrexate. Other outcomes, including disease activity and mortality, did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion In patients with RA, important differences exist between those who are ANA‐positive and ANA‐negative in terms of time to fulfillment of RA criteria and time to DMARD initiation as well as choice of initial pharmacotherapy. These findings could indicate a difference in clinical presentation or perception of patients with RA who are ANA‐positive. Further research is needed to study the long‐term outcomes of patients with RA who are ANA‐positive.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11271
work_keys_str_mv AT sujaythaspaknikar exploringtheroleofantinuclearantibodypositivityinthediagnosistreatmentandhealthoutcomesofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT cynthiascrowson exploringtheroleofantinuclearantibodypositivityinthediagnosistreatmentandhealthoutcomesofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT johnmdavis exploringtheroleofantinuclearantibodypositivityinthediagnosistreatmentandhealthoutcomesofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT umathanarajasingam exploringtheroleofantinuclearantibodypositivityinthediagnosistreatmentandhealthoutcomesofpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
_version_ 1721375180649922560