Magneto-Rossby Waves and Seismology of Solar Interior

Eleven-year Schwabe cycle in solar activity is not yet fully understood despite of its almost two century discovery. It is generally interpreted as owing to some sort of magnetic dynamo operating below or inside the convection zone. The magnetic field strength in the dynamo layer may determine the i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili, Eka Gurgenashvili
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fspas.2018.00007/full
id doaj-83af53db4734495284c8ba24f702a2b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83af53db4734495284c8ba24f702a2b72020-11-24T22:19:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2296-987X2018-02-01510.3389/fspas.2018.00007341984Magneto-Rossby Waves and Seismology of Solar InteriorTeimuraz V. Zaqarashvili0Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili1Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili2Eka Gurgenashvili3Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, AustriaAbastumani Astrophysical Observatory at Ilia State University, Tbilisi, GeorgiaInstitute of Physics (IGAM), University of Graz, Graz, AustriaAbastumani Astrophysical Observatory at Ilia State University, Tbilisi, GeorgiaEleven-year Schwabe cycle in solar activity is not yet fully understood despite of its almost two century discovery. It is generally interpreted as owing to some sort of magnetic dynamo operating below or inside the convection zone. The magnetic field strength in the dynamo layer may determine the importance of the tachocline in the model which is responsible for the cyclic magnetic field, but the direct measurement is not possible. On the other hand, solar activity also displays short term variations over time scale of months (Rieger-type periodicity), which significantly depend on solar activity level: stronger cycles (or more active hemisphere in each cycle) generally show shorter periodicity and vice versa. The periodicity is probably connected to Rossby-type waves in the dynamo layer, therefore alongside with wave dispersion relations it might be used to estimate the dynamo magnetic field strength. We performed the wavelet analysis of hemispheric sunspot areas during solar cycles 13–24 and corresponding hemispheric values of Rieger-type periodicity are found in each cycle. Two different Rossby-type waves could lead to observed periodicities: spherical fast magneto-Rossby waves and equatorial Poincare-Rossby waves. The dispersion relation of spherical fast magneto-Rossby waves gives the estimated field strength of >40 kG in stronger cycles (or in more active hemisphere) and <40 kG in weaker cycles (or in less active hemisphere). The equatorial Poincare-Rossby waves lead to >20 kG and <15 kG, respectively. Future perspectives of Rieger-type periodicities and Rossby-type waves in testing various dynamo models are discussed.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fspas.2018.00007/fullsolar activityrossby wavesrieger-type periodicitysolar interiorsolar dynamo
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili
Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili
Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili
Eka Gurgenashvili
spellingShingle Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili
Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili
Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili
Eka Gurgenashvili
Magneto-Rossby Waves and Seismology of Solar Interior
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
solar activity
rossby waves
rieger-type periodicity
solar interior
solar dynamo
author_facet Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili
Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili
Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili
Eka Gurgenashvili
author_sort Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili
title Magneto-Rossby Waves and Seismology of Solar Interior
title_short Magneto-Rossby Waves and Seismology of Solar Interior
title_full Magneto-Rossby Waves and Seismology of Solar Interior
title_fullStr Magneto-Rossby Waves and Seismology of Solar Interior
title_full_unstemmed Magneto-Rossby Waves and Seismology of Solar Interior
title_sort magneto-rossby waves and seismology of solar interior
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
issn 2296-987X
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Eleven-year Schwabe cycle in solar activity is not yet fully understood despite of its almost two century discovery. It is generally interpreted as owing to some sort of magnetic dynamo operating below or inside the convection zone. The magnetic field strength in the dynamo layer may determine the importance of the tachocline in the model which is responsible for the cyclic magnetic field, but the direct measurement is not possible. On the other hand, solar activity also displays short term variations over time scale of months (Rieger-type periodicity), which significantly depend on solar activity level: stronger cycles (or more active hemisphere in each cycle) generally show shorter periodicity and vice versa. The periodicity is probably connected to Rossby-type waves in the dynamo layer, therefore alongside with wave dispersion relations it might be used to estimate the dynamo magnetic field strength. We performed the wavelet analysis of hemispheric sunspot areas during solar cycles 13–24 and corresponding hemispheric values of Rieger-type periodicity are found in each cycle. Two different Rossby-type waves could lead to observed periodicities: spherical fast magneto-Rossby waves and equatorial Poincare-Rossby waves. The dispersion relation of spherical fast magneto-Rossby waves gives the estimated field strength of >40 kG in stronger cycles (or in more active hemisphere) and <40 kG in weaker cycles (or in less active hemisphere). The equatorial Poincare-Rossby waves lead to >20 kG and <15 kG, respectively. Future perspectives of Rieger-type periodicities and Rossby-type waves in testing various dynamo models are discussed.
topic solar activity
rossby waves
rieger-type periodicity
solar interior
solar dynamo
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fspas.2018.00007/full
work_keys_str_mv AT teimurazvzaqarashvili magnetorossbywavesandseismologyofsolarinterior
AT teimurazvzaqarashvili magnetorossbywavesandseismologyofsolarinterior
AT teimurazvzaqarashvili magnetorossbywavesandseismologyofsolarinterior
AT ekagurgenashvili magnetorossbywavesandseismologyofsolarinterior
_version_ 1725777554120376320