Comparison between Kaltenborn and General Scapular Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis Patients

Background: To compare the efficacy of Kaltenborn scapular mobilization with the general scapular mobilization in the physical therapy management of adhesive capsulitis in patients with restricted abduction above 90 degrees. Methods: In this descriptive study all the patients with non traumatic adh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Syed Shakil-ur- Rehman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rawalpindi Medical University 2012-12-01
Series:Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/564
id doaj-83e1f1260e864a8b901b3fa0ca402456
record_format Article
spelling doaj-83e1f1260e864a8b901b3fa0ca4024562020-11-25T03:59:35ZengRawalpindi Medical UniversityJournal of Rawalpindi Medical College1683-35621683-35702012-12-01162Comparison between Kaltenborn and General Scapular Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis PatientsSyed Shakil-ur- Rehman0Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Islamic International Medical College Background: To compare the efficacy of Kaltenborn scapular mobilization with the general scapular mobilization in the physical therapy management of adhesive capsulitis in patients with restricted abduction above 90 degrees. Methods: In this descriptive study all the patients with non traumatic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder with positive Apley’s scratch test and restricted abduction above 90 degree were included . All were treated in the out-patients department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation for five days a week for two weeks.Forty seven patients were included in the study. They were randomly placed in two groups with 25 patients in group A( Kaltenborn technique group ) and 22 patients in group B (General scapular mobilization group). Results: The Kaltenborn technique was applied on 25 patients of group A, in which 17 patients showed significant increase in the range of motion (ROM) and 8 patients did not show any increase in ROM. In group B general scapular mobilization was applied on 22 patients in which 12 patients showed significant increase in ROM and 12 patients did not show any increase in ROM. Conclusion: The Kaltenborn scapular mobilization technique is more effective as compared to the general scapular mobilization technique to increase restricted abduction above 90 degrees in adhesive capsulitis. https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/564Kaltenborn scapular MobilizationGeneral Scapular MobilizationAdhesive capsulitis.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Syed Shakil-ur- Rehman
spellingShingle Syed Shakil-ur- Rehman
Comparison between Kaltenborn and General Scapular Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis Patients
Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Kaltenborn scapular Mobilization
General Scapular Mobilization
Adhesive capsulitis.
author_facet Syed Shakil-ur- Rehman
author_sort Syed Shakil-ur- Rehman
title Comparison between Kaltenborn and General Scapular Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis Patients
title_short Comparison between Kaltenborn and General Scapular Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis Patients
title_full Comparison between Kaltenborn and General Scapular Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis Patients
title_fullStr Comparison between Kaltenborn and General Scapular Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Kaltenborn and General Scapular Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis Patients
title_sort comparison between kaltenborn and general scapular mobilization in adhesive capsulitis patients
publisher Rawalpindi Medical University
series Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
issn 1683-3562
1683-3570
publishDate 2012-12-01
description Background: To compare the efficacy of Kaltenborn scapular mobilization with the general scapular mobilization in the physical therapy management of adhesive capsulitis in patients with restricted abduction above 90 degrees. Methods: In this descriptive study all the patients with non traumatic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder with positive Apley’s scratch test and restricted abduction above 90 degree were included . All were treated in the out-patients department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation for five days a week for two weeks.Forty seven patients were included in the study. They were randomly placed in two groups with 25 patients in group A( Kaltenborn technique group ) and 22 patients in group B (General scapular mobilization group). Results: The Kaltenborn technique was applied on 25 patients of group A, in which 17 patients showed significant increase in the range of motion (ROM) and 8 patients did not show any increase in ROM. In group B general scapular mobilization was applied on 22 patients in which 12 patients showed significant increase in ROM and 12 patients did not show any increase in ROM. Conclusion: The Kaltenborn scapular mobilization technique is more effective as compared to the general scapular mobilization technique to increase restricted abduction above 90 degrees in adhesive capsulitis.
topic Kaltenborn scapular Mobilization
General Scapular Mobilization
Adhesive capsulitis.
url https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/564
work_keys_str_mv AT syedshakilurrehman comparisonbetweenkaltenbornandgeneralscapularmobilizationinadhesivecapsulitispatients
_version_ 1724453938768379904