Effect of dataset selection on the topological interpretation of protein interaction networks

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies of the yeast protein interaction network have revealed distinct correlations between the connectivity of individual proteins within the network and the average connectivity of their neighbours. Although a number of biological...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robertson David L, Hakes Luke, Oliver Stephen G
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-09-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/6/131
id doaj-844bf5a3e39c4afcaa4a2710c8502abf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-844bf5a3e39c4afcaa4a2710c8502abf2020-11-25T00:24:55ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642005-09-016113110.1186/1471-2164-6-131Effect of dataset selection on the topological interpretation of protein interaction networksRobertson David LHakes LukeOliver Stephen G<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies of the yeast protein interaction network have revealed distinct correlations between the connectivity of individual proteins within the network and the average connectivity of their neighbours. Although a number of biological mechanisms have been proposed to account for these findings, the significance and influence of the specific datasets included in these studies has not been appreciated adequately.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We show how the use of different interaction data sets, such as those resulting from high-throughput or small-scale studies, and different modelling methodologies for the derivation pair-wise protein interactions, can dramatically change the topology of these networks. Furthermore, we show that some of the previously reported features identified in these networks may simply be the result of experimental or methodological errors and biases.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>When performing network-based studies, it is essential to define what is meant by the term "interaction" and this must be taken into account when interpreting the topologies of the networks generated. Consideration must be given to the type of data included and appropriate controls that take into account the idiosyncrasies of the data must be selected</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/6/131
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robertson David L
Hakes Luke
Oliver Stephen G
spellingShingle Robertson David L
Hakes Luke
Oliver Stephen G
Effect of dataset selection on the topological interpretation of protein interaction networks
BMC Genomics
author_facet Robertson David L
Hakes Luke
Oliver Stephen G
author_sort Robertson David L
title Effect of dataset selection on the topological interpretation of protein interaction networks
title_short Effect of dataset selection on the topological interpretation of protein interaction networks
title_full Effect of dataset selection on the topological interpretation of protein interaction networks
title_fullStr Effect of dataset selection on the topological interpretation of protein interaction networks
title_full_unstemmed Effect of dataset selection on the topological interpretation of protein interaction networks
title_sort effect of dataset selection on the topological interpretation of protein interaction networks
publisher BMC
series BMC Genomics
issn 1471-2164
publishDate 2005-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies of the yeast protein interaction network have revealed distinct correlations between the connectivity of individual proteins within the network and the average connectivity of their neighbours. Although a number of biological mechanisms have been proposed to account for these findings, the significance and influence of the specific datasets included in these studies has not been appreciated adequately.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We show how the use of different interaction data sets, such as those resulting from high-throughput or small-scale studies, and different modelling methodologies for the derivation pair-wise protein interactions, can dramatically change the topology of these networks. Furthermore, we show that some of the previously reported features identified in these networks may simply be the result of experimental or methodological errors and biases.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>When performing network-based studies, it is essential to define what is meant by the term "interaction" and this must be taken into account when interpreting the topologies of the networks generated. Consideration must be given to the type of data included and appropriate controls that take into account the idiosyncrasies of the data must be selected</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/6/131
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsondavidl effectofdatasetselectiononthetopologicalinterpretationofproteininteractionnetworks
AT hakesluke effectofdatasetselectiononthetopologicalinterpretationofproteininteractionnetworks
AT oliverstepheng effectofdatasetselectiononthetopologicalinterpretationofproteininteractionnetworks
_version_ 1725350877938581504