Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.

In recent decades, many marine populations have experienced major declines in abundance, but we still know little about where management interventions may help protect the highest levels of marine biodiversity. We used modeled spatial distribution data for nearly 12,500 species to quantify global pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth R Selig, Will R Turner, Sebastian Troëng, Bryan P Wallace, Benjamin S Halpern, Kristin Kaschner, Ben G Lascelles, Kent E Carpenter, Russell A Mittermeier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3885410?pdf=render
id doaj-845ceb7a600d47c6935c0cdbd9219f40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-845ceb7a600d47c6935c0cdbd9219f402020-11-25T02:42:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8289810.1371/journal.pone.0082898Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.Elizabeth R SeligWill R TurnerSebastian TroëngBryan P WallaceBenjamin S HalpernKristin KaschnerBen G LascellesKent E CarpenterRussell A MittermeierIn recent decades, many marine populations have experienced major declines in abundance, but we still know little about where management interventions may help protect the highest levels of marine biodiversity. We used modeled spatial distribution data for nearly 12,500 species to quantify global patterns of species richness and two measures of endemism. By combining these data with spatial information on cumulative human impacts, we identified priority areas where marine biodiversity is most and least impacted by human activities, both within Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ). Our analyses highlighted places that are both accepted priorities for marine conservation like the Coral Triangle, as well as less well-known locations in the southwest Indian Ocean, western Pacific Ocean, Arctic and Antarctic Oceans, and within semi-enclosed seas like the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas. Within highly impacted priority areas, climate and fishing were the biggest stressors. Although new priorities may arise as we continue to improve marine species range datasets, results from this work are an essential first step in guiding limited resources to regions where investment could best sustain marine biodiversity.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3885410?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elizabeth R Selig
Will R Turner
Sebastian Troëng
Bryan P Wallace
Benjamin S Halpern
Kristin Kaschner
Ben G Lascelles
Kent E Carpenter
Russell A Mittermeier
spellingShingle Elizabeth R Selig
Will R Turner
Sebastian Troëng
Bryan P Wallace
Benjamin S Halpern
Kristin Kaschner
Ben G Lascelles
Kent E Carpenter
Russell A Mittermeier
Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Elizabeth R Selig
Will R Turner
Sebastian Troëng
Bryan P Wallace
Benjamin S Halpern
Kristin Kaschner
Ben G Lascelles
Kent E Carpenter
Russell A Mittermeier
author_sort Elizabeth R Selig
title Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.
title_short Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.
title_full Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.
title_fullStr Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.
title_full_unstemmed Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.
title_sort global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description In recent decades, many marine populations have experienced major declines in abundance, but we still know little about where management interventions may help protect the highest levels of marine biodiversity. We used modeled spatial distribution data for nearly 12,500 species to quantify global patterns of species richness and two measures of endemism. By combining these data with spatial information on cumulative human impacts, we identified priority areas where marine biodiversity is most and least impacted by human activities, both within Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ). Our analyses highlighted places that are both accepted priorities for marine conservation like the Coral Triangle, as well as less well-known locations in the southwest Indian Ocean, western Pacific Ocean, Arctic and Antarctic Oceans, and within semi-enclosed seas like the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas. Within highly impacted priority areas, climate and fishing were the biggest stressors. Although new priorities may arise as we continue to improve marine species range datasets, results from this work are an essential first step in guiding limited resources to regions where investment could best sustain marine biodiversity.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3885410?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethrselig globalprioritiesformarinebiodiversityconservation
AT willrturner globalprioritiesformarinebiodiversityconservation
AT sebastiantroeng globalprioritiesformarinebiodiversityconservation
AT bryanpwallace globalprioritiesformarinebiodiversityconservation
AT benjaminshalpern globalprioritiesformarinebiodiversityconservation
AT kristinkaschner globalprioritiesformarinebiodiversityconservation
AT benglascelles globalprioritiesformarinebiodiversityconservation
AT kentecarpenter globalprioritiesformarinebiodiversityconservation
AT russellamittermeier globalprioritiesformarinebiodiversityconservation
_version_ 1724773762083061760