Strain-dependent differences in corticolimbic processing of aversive or rewarding stimuli

Aberrations in the elaboration of both aversive and rewarding stimuli characterize several psychopathologies including anxiety, depression and addiction. Several studies suggest that different neurotrasmitters, within the corticolimbic system, are critically involved in the processing of positive an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diego eAndolina, Stefano ePuglisi-Allegra, Rossella eVentura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00207/full
id doaj-849d15874a734161a678f5ac0c96ec23
record_format Article
spelling doaj-849d15874a734161a678f5ac0c96ec232020-11-24T21:03:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience1662-51372015-02-01810.3389/fnsys.2014.00207105652Strain-dependent differences in corticolimbic processing of aversive or rewarding stimuliDiego eAndolina0Diego eAndolina1Stefano ePuglisi-Allegra2Stefano ePuglisi-Allegra3Rossella eVentura4Rossella eVentura5Universita` degli Studi dell’AquilaSanta Lucia FoundationUniversità di Roma SapienzaSanta Lucia FoundationUniversità di Roma SapienzaSanta Lucia FoundationAberrations in the elaboration of both aversive and rewarding stimuli characterize several psychopathologies including anxiety, depression and addiction. Several studies suggest that different neurotrasmitters, within the corticolimbic system, are critically involved in the processing of positive and negative stimuli. Individual differences in this system, depending on genotype, have been shown to act as a liability factor for different psychopathologies. Inbred mouse strains are commonly used in preclinical studies of normal and pathological behaviors. In particular, C57BL/6J (C57) and DBA/2J (DBA) strains have permitted to disclose the impact of different genetic backgrounds over the corticolimbic system functions. Here, we summarize the main findings collected over the years in our laboratory, showing how the genetic background plays a critical role in modulating amminergic and GABAergic neurotransmission in prefrontal-accumbal-amygdala system response to different rewarding and aversive experiences, as well as to stress response. Finally, we propose a top-down model for the response to rewarding and aversive stimuli in which amminergic transmission in PFC controls accumbal and amygdala neurotransmitter response.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00207/fullstressneurotransmissionStraincorticolimbicrewarding stimuli
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diego eAndolina
Diego eAndolina
Stefano ePuglisi-Allegra
Stefano ePuglisi-Allegra
Rossella eVentura
Rossella eVentura
spellingShingle Diego eAndolina
Diego eAndolina
Stefano ePuglisi-Allegra
Stefano ePuglisi-Allegra
Rossella eVentura
Rossella eVentura
Strain-dependent differences in corticolimbic processing of aversive or rewarding stimuli
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
stress
neurotransmission
Strain
corticolimbic
rewarding stimuli
author_facet Diego eAndolina
Diego eAndolina
Stefano ePuglisi-Allegra
Stefano ePuglisi-Allegra
Rossella eVentura
Rossella eVentura
author_sort Diego eAndolina
title Strain-dependent differences in corticolimbic processing of aversive or rewarding stimuli
title_short Strain-dependent differences in corticolimbic processing of aversive or rewarding stimuli
title_full Strain-dependent differences in corticolimbic processing of aversive or rewarding stimuli
title_fullStr Strain-dependent differences in corticolimbic processing of aversive or rewarding stimuli
title_full_unstemmed Strain-dependent differences in corticolimbic processing of aversive or rewarding stimuli
title_sort strain-dependent differences in corticolimbic processing of aversive or rewarding stimuli
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
issn 1662-5137
publishDate 2015-02-01
description Aberrations in the elaboration of both aversive and rewarding stimuli characterize several psychopathologies including anxiety, depression and addiction. Several studies suggest that different neurotrasmitters, within the corticolimbic system, are critically involved in the processing of positive and negative stimuli. Individual differences in this system, depending on genotype, have been shown to act as a liability factor for different psychopathologies. Inbred mouse strains are commonly used in preclinical studies of normal and pathological behaviors. In particular, C57BL/6J (C57) and DBA/2J (DBA) strains have permitted to disclose the impact of different genetic backgrounds over the corticolimbic system functions. Here, we summarize the main findings collected over the years in our laboratory, showing how the genetic background plays a critical role in modulating amminergic and GABAergic neurotransmission in prefrontal-accumbal-amygdala system response to different rewarding and aversive experiences, as well as to stress response. Finally, we propose a top-down model for the response to rewarding and aversive stimuli in which amminergic transmission in PFC controls accumbal and amygdala neurotransmitter response.
topic stress
neurotransmission
Strain
corticolimbic
rewarding stimuli
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00207/full
work_keys_str_mv AT diegoeandolina straindependentdifferencesincorticolimbicprocessingofaversiveorrewardingstimuli
AT diegoeandolina straindependentdifferencesincorticolimbicprocessingofaversiveorrewardingstimuli
AT stefanoepuglisiallegra straindependentdifferencesincorticolimbicprocessingofaversiveorrewardingstimuli
AT stefanoepuglisiallegra straindependentdifferencesincorticolimbicprocessingofaversiveorrewardingstimuli
AT rossellaeventura straindependentdifferencesincorticolimbicprocessingofaversiveorrewardingstimuli
AT rossellaeventura straindependentdifferencesincorticolimbicprocessingofaversiveorrewardingstimuli
_version_ 1716772811944493056