Differences in Simulated EMG Activities between a Non-Rotational Shot and an Ordinary Instep Kick Identified by Principal Component Analysis

The aim of this study was to clarify the major differences in the electromyographic (EMG) activities in the hip joint required to achieve a non-rotational (NR) shot as compared with an instep kick from the spatiotemporal data. For this purpose, simulated EMG activities obtained from NR shots and ins...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tasuku Miyoshi, Yasuhisa Kamada, Yoshiyuki Kobayashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/49/1/154
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to clarify the major differences in the electromyographic (EMG) activities in the hip joint required to achieve a non-rotational (NR) shot as compared with an instep kick from the spatiotemporal data. For this purpose, simulated EMG activities obtained from NR shots and instep kicks were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA). The PCA was conducted using an input matrix constructed from the time-normalized average and the standard deviation of the EMG activities (101 data x (15 muscles; iliacus, gluteus maximus, rectus femoris, biceos femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, vastus intermedius, semimembranosus, semitendinosus, sartorius, tensor fasciae latae muscle, adductor magnus muscle, adductor longus muscle, gasctrocnemius, and tibialis anterior)). The PCA revealed that the 3rd, 4th and 8th principal component vectors (PCVs) of the 10 generated PCVs were related to achieving the NR shot (<i>p</i> < 0.05).
ISSN:2504-3900