Global Health Governance: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Doha Declaration, and Democratisation

Global public health agreements are heralded as a success for the affirmation of the right to health within a complex and contested political landscape. However, the practical implementation of such agreements at the national level is often overlooked. This article outlines two radically different g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evelyne de Leeuw, Hans Löfgren, Erik Martin, Belinda Townsend
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2012-05-01
Series:Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/2/2/186
id doaj-84ea3453295348f185cd41315657552b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-84ea3453295348f185cd41315657552b2020-11-24T23:05:10ZengMDPI AGAdministrative Sciences2076-33872012-05-012218620210.3390/admsci2020186Global Health Governance: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Doha Declaration, and DemocratisationEvelyne de LeeuwHans LöfgrenErik MartinBelinda TownsendGlobal public health agreements are heralded as a success for the affirmation of the right to health within a complex and contested political landscape. However, the practical implementation of such agreements at the national level is often overlooked. This article outlines two radically different global health agreements: The Doha Declaration on the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement and Public Health; and the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). We identify significant challenges in their implementation, particularly for low and middle income countries. Shifts in the policy network constellations around these two agreements have allowed for some positive influence by civil society. Yet industry influence at the national level constrains effective implementation and those affected by these policies have largely been left on the periphery. The broader provisions of these two agreements have been watered down by vested interests and donor conditions. We advocate for both activist and academic actors to play a significant role in highlighting the consequences of these power asymmetries. Deliberative democracy may be the key to addressing these challenges in a way that empowers those presently excluded from effective participation in the policy process.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/2/2/186global health governancedeliberative democracyimplementationinternational public health policyFCTCTRIPSDoha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Evelyne de Leeuw
Hans Löfgren
Erik Martin
Belinda Townsend
spellingShingle Evelyne de Leeuw
Hans Löfgren
Erik Martin
Belinda Townsend
Global Health Governance: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Doha Declaration, and Democratisation
Administrative Sciences
global health governance
deliberative democracy
implementation
international public health policy
FCTC
TRIPS
Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health
author_facet Evelyne de Leeuw
Hans Löfgren
Erik Martin
Belinda Townsend
author_sort Evelyne de Leeuw
title Global Health Governance: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Doha Declaration, and Democratisation
title_short Global Health Governance: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Doha Declaration, and Democratisation
title_full Global Health Governance: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Doha Declaration, and Democratisation
title_fullStr Global Health Governance: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Doha Declaration, and Democratisation
title_full_unstemmed Global Health Governance: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the Doha Declaration, and Democratisation
title_sort global health governance: framework convention on tobacco control (fctc), the doha declaration, and democratisation
publisher MDPI AG
series Administrative Sciences
issn 2076-3387
publishDate 2012-05-01
description Global public health agreements are heralded as a success for the affirmation of the right to health within a complex and contested political landscape. However, the practical implementation of such agreements at the national level is often overlooked. This article outlines two radically different global health agreements: The Doha Declaration on the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement and Public Health; and the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). We identify significant challenges in their implementation, particularly for low and middle income countries. Shifts in the policy network constellations around these two agreements have allowed for some positive influence by civil society. Yet industry influence at the national level constrains effective implementation and those affected by these policies have largely been left on the periphery. The broader provisions of these two agreements have been watered down by vested interests and donor conditions. We advocate for both activist and academic actors to play a significant role in highlighting the consequences of these power asymmetries. Deliberative democracy may be the key to addressing these challenges in a way that empowers those presently excluded from effective participation in the policy process.
topic global health governance
deliberative democracy
implementation
international public health policy
FCTC
TRIPS
Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/2/2/186
work_keys_str_mv AT evelynedeleeuw globalhealthgovernanceframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolfctcthedohadeclarationanddemocratisation
AT hanslofgren globalhealthgovernanceframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolfctcthedohadeclarationanddemocratisation
AT erikmartin globalhealthgovernanceframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolfctcthedohadeclarationanddemocratisation
AT belindatownsend globalhealthgovernanceframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolfctcthedohadeclarationanddemocratisation
_version_ 1725627110783975424