Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust

Orientation: Research concerning trust relationships on the interpersonal level, particularly when studied in dyadic relationships from the follower’s point of view, is relatively scarce. Only a few researchers have attempted to link multiple dimensions of trust in the same study. Research purpose:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marita Heyns, Sebastiaan Rothmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2015-05-01
Series:SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
Online Access:https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1263
id doaj-84ef92b7814144a1ab38848b9ebea5c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-84ef92b7814144a1ab38848b9ebea5c72020-11-24T20:59:13ZengAOSISSA Journal of Industrial Psychology0258-52002071-07632015-05-01411e1e1210.4102/sajip.v41i1.1263981Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trustMarita Heyns0Sebastiaan Rothmann1Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vaal Triangle CampusOptentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vaal Triangle CampusOrientation: Research concerning trust relationships on the interpersonal level, particularly when studied in dyadic relationships from the follower’s point of view, is relatively scarce. Only a few researchers have attempted to link multiple dimensions of trust in the same study. Research purpose: This study examined the dynamic interplay between trust propensity, trustworthiness beliefs and the decision to trust, as perceived within dyadic workplace relationships. Motivation for the study: No studies, as far as the authors are aware, have ever attempted to use a combination of Mayer and Davis’s well-known assessment of trustworthiness and Gillespie’s measure of behavioural trust within the same study. By including measures of main antecedents and the actual decision to trust in the same study, the multidimensionality of trust can be established more concretely. Research approach, design and method: A cross-sectional survey design with a convenience sample (N = 539) was used. The Behavioural Trust Inventory and the Organisational Trust Instrument were administered. Main findings: Results confirmed the distinctness of propensity, trustworthiness and trust as separate main constructs. Trust was strongly associated with trustworthiness beliefs. Trustworthiness beliefs fully mediated the relationship between propensity and trust. The observed relations between propensity and trustworthiness suggest that individuals with a natural predisposition to trust others will be more inclined to perceive a specific trust referent as trustworthy. Practical/managerial implications: Leaders should realise that their attitudes and behaviour have a decisive impact on trust formation processes: if they are being perceived as trustworthy, followers will be likely to respond by engaging in trusting behaviours towards them. Tools to assess followers’ perceptions of the trustworthiness of the leader may provide useful feedback that can guide leaders. Contribution/value-add: This study contributes to scientific knowledge regarding the influence of propensity to trust and trustworthiness on trust of leaders.https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1263
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marita Heyns
Sebastiaan Rothmann
spellingShingle Marita Heyns
Sebastiaan Rothmann
Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust
SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
author_facet Marita Heyns
Sebastiaan Rothmann
author_sort Marita Heyns
title Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust
title_short Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust
title_full Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust
title_fullStr Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust
title_full_unstemmed Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust
title_sort dimensionality of trust: an analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust
publisher AOSIS
series SA Journal of Industrial Psychology
issn 0258-5200
2071-0763
publishDate 2015-05-01
description Orientation: Research concerning trust relationships on the interpersonal level, particularly when studied in dyadic relationships from the follower’s point of view, is relatively scarce. Only a few researchers have attempted to link multiple dimensions of trust in the same study. Research purpose: This study examined the dynamic interplay between trust propensity, trustworthiness beliefs and the decision to trust, as perceived within dyadic workplace relationships. Motivation for the study: No studies, as far as the authors are aware, have ever attempted to use a combination of Mayer and Davis’s well-known assessment of trustworthiness and Gillespie’s measure of behavioural trust within the same study. By including measures of main antecedents and the actual decision to trust in the same study, the multidimensionality of trust can be established more concretely. Research approach, design and method: A cross-sectional survey design with a convenience sample (N = 539) was used. The Behavioural Trust Inventory and the Organisational Trust Instrument were administered. Main findings: Results confirmed the distinctness of propensity, trustworthiness and trust as separate main constructs. Trust was strongly associated with trustworthiness beliefs. Trustworthiness beliefs fully mediated the relationship between propensity and trust. The observed relations between propensity and trustworthiness suggest that individuals with a natural predisposition to trust others will be more inclined to perceive a specific trust referent as trustworthy. Practical/managerial implications: Leaders should realise that their attitudes and behaviour have a decisive impact on trust formation processes: if they are being perceived as trustworthy, followers will be likely to respond by engaging in trusting behaviours towards them. Tools to assess followers’ perceptions of the trustworthiness of the leader may provide useful feedback that can guide leaders. Contribution/value-add: This study contributes to scientific knowledge regarding the influence of propensity to trust and trustworthiness on trust of leaders.
url https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1263
work_keys_str_mv AT maritaheyns dimensionalityoftrustananalysisoftherelationsbetweenpropensitytrustworthinessandtrust
AT sebastiaanrothmann dimensionalityoftrustananalysisoftherelationsbetweenpropensitytrustworthinessandtrust
_version_ 1716783265374797824