A comparison of effi cacy of femoral and tibial fractures healing treated by static and dynamic intramedullary nails

<strong>Introduction:</strong> Intramedullary nailing is synthesis and  consolidation of fracture fragments with the main goal<br />to gain strength and permanent placement of the implants. Two techniques of intramedullary osteosynthesis are used: with dynamic or with static intram...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Đemil Omerović, Dijana Avdić, Faruk Lazović
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Sarajevo 2012-12-01
Series:Journal of Health Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jhsci.ba/OJS/index.php/jhsci/article/view/36
id doaj-8514f7b94e044bf6b5bdd7b5913a8430
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8514f7b94e044bf6b5bdd7b5913a84302020-11-25T01:25:33ZengUniversity of SarajevoJournal of Health Sciences 2232-75761986-80492012-12-0123176183A comparison of effi cacy of femoral and tibial fractures healing treated by static and dynamic intramedullary nailsĐemil OmerovićDijana AvdićFaruk Lazović<strong>Introduction:</strong> Intramedullary nailing is synthesis and  consolidation of fracture fragments with the main goal<br />to gain strength and permanent placement of the implants. Two techniques of intramedullary osteosynthesis are used: with dynamic or with static intramedullary nail. Dynamization include conversion of static nail by removing screws from the longest fragment. The aim of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in the speed and quality of healing of the type A and B fractures of the femur and tibia treated by static or dynamic intramedullary nails and to compare the results.<br /><br /><strong>Methods</strong>: The study was conducted on a total of 129 patients with closed fractures of the diaphysis of the femur and tibia type A and type B. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the applied operating method, static or dynamic intramedullary osteosynthesis.<br /><br /><strong>Results:</strong> The average number of weeks of healing femoral and tibial fractures was slightly in advantage of static intramedullary osteosynthesis, it was 17.08 weeks (SD=3.382). The average number of weeks of healing in 23 patients with fractures of the femur, treated by dynamic intramedullary osteosynthesis was 17.83 (SD=2.978).<br /><br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> We can conclude that static intramedullary nailing osteosynthesis unable movements between fragments which directly stimulates bone formation and formation of minimal callus. Static intramedullary ostesinthesys resolve the problem of stabilizing the fracture, limb shortening and rotation of fragments.http://jhsci.ba/OJS/index.php/jhsci/article/view/36fracture healing, intramedullary nailing, dynamic and static intramedullary nail
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Đemil Omerović
Dijana Avdić
Faruk Lazović
spellingShingle Đemil Omerović
Dijana Avdić
Faruk Lazović
A comparison of effi cacy of femoral and tibial fractures healing treated by static and dynamic intramedullary nails
Journal of Health Sciences
fracture healing, intramedullary nailing, dynamic and static intramedullary nail
author_facet Đemil Omerović
Dijana Avdić
Faruk Lazović
author_sort Đemil Omerović
title A comparison of effi cacy of femoral and tibial fractures healing treated by static and dynamic intramedullary nails
title_short A comparison of effi cacy of femoral and tibial fractures healing treated by static and dynamic intramedullary nails
title_full A comparison of effi cacy of femoral and tibial fractures healing treated by static and dynamic intramedullary nails
title_fullStr A comparison of effi cacy of femoral and tibial fractures healing treated by static and dynamic intramedullary nails
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of effi cacy of femoral and tibial fractures healing treated by static and dynamic intramedullary nails
title_sort comparison of effi cacy of femoral and tibial fractures healing treated by static and dynamic intramedullary nails
publisher University of Sarajevo
series Journal of Health Sciences
issn 2232-7576
1986-8049
publishDate 2012-12-01
description <strong>Introduction:</strong> Intramedullary nailing is synthesis and  consolidation of fracture fragments with the main goal<br />to gain strength and permanent placement of the implants. Two techniques of intramedullary osteosynthesis are used: with dynamic or with static intramedullary nail. Dynamization include conversion of static nail by removing screws from the longest fragment. The aim of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in the speed and quality of healing of the type A and B fractures of the femur and tibia treated by static or dynamic intramedullary nails and to compare the results.<br /><br /><strong>Methods</strong>: The study was conducted on a total of 129 patients with closed fractures of the diaphysis of the femur and tibia type A and type B. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the applied operating method, static or dynamic intramedullary osteosynthesis.<br /><br /><strong>Results:</strong> The average number of weeks of healing femoral and tibial fractures was slightly in advantage of static intramedullary osteosynthesis, it was 17.08 weeks (SD=3.382). The average number of weeks of healing in 23 patients with fractures of the femur, treated by dynamic intramedullary osteosynthesis was 17.83 (SD=2.978).<br /><br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> We can conclude that static intramedullary nailing osteosynthesis unable movements between fragments which directly stimulates bone formation and formation of minimal callus. Static intramedullary ostesinthesys resolve the problem of stabilizing the fracture, limb shortening and rotation of fragments.
topic fracture healing, intramedullary nailing, dynamic and static intramedullary nail
url http://jhsci.ba/OJS/index.php/jhsci/article/view/36
work_keys_str_mv AT đemilomerovic acomparisonofefficacyoffemoralandtibialfractureshealingtreatedbystaticanddynamicintramedullarynails
AT dijanaavdic acomparisonofefficacyoffemoralandtibialfractureshealingtreatedbystaticanddynamicintramedullarynails
AT faruklazovic acomparisonofefficacyoffemoralandtibialfractureshealingtreatedbystaticanddynamicintramedullarynails
AT đemilomerovic comparisonofefficacyoffemoralandtibialfractureshealingtreatedbystaticanddynamicintramedullarynails
AT dijanaavdic comparisonofefficacyoffemoralandtibialfractureshealingtreatedbystaticanddynamicintramedullarynails
AT faruklazovic comparisonofefficacyoffemoralandtibialfractureshealingtreatedbystaticanddynamicintramedullarynails
_version_ 1725113370956267520