The criterion of distributive justice in economics and politics

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the criteria of distributive justice in economics and politics. We have therefore attempted to answer the question: "What good in government should be distributed fairly and what is the criterion of fair distribution?" In this essay, we fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hasanali Aliakbariyan
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Bagher al-Olum University 2020-02-01
Series:علوم سیاسی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psq.bou.ac.ir/article_68432_455ac169827a03c79187685af9a14937.pdf
id doaj-851ce996504b4e8ca91884dcd5bdc06e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-851ce996504b4e8ca91884dcd5bdc06e2020-11-25T03:08:08Zfas Bagher al-Olum Universityعلوم سیاسی1735-05572645-57732020-02-0122شماره 87 - پاییز 98335610.22081/psq.2020.6843268432The criterion of distributive justice in economics and politicsHasanali Aliakbariyan0Associate Professor, Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy, Qom, IranThe purpose of the present study is to investigate the criteria of distributive justice in economics and politics. We have therefore attempted to answer the question: "What good in government should be distributed fairly and what is the criterion of fair distribution?" In this essay, we first examine the two "assignmentist" and "consequentialist" views on distributive justice and discuss the relationship between assignments and outcome in distributive justice. Next, the relationship between distributive justice and other Islamic economic goals was studied, and distributive justice was analyzed in two areas: "providing public welfare" and "moderating wealth". The results suggested that the government should distribute its possessions and opportunities under the two rules of "providing public welfare" and "wealth adjustment". This criterion is conclusive; the findings also indicate that "task-oriented" norms such as equality, entitlement and need, or a combination of them, are not effective in today's societies. Distributive justice in the non-economic domain can also be pursued in other social areas - such as politics.http://psq.bou.ac.ir/article_68432_455ac169827a03c79187685af9a14937.pdf: distributive justiceislamic economicseconomic policypublic sufficiencywealth distribution
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hasanali Aliakbariyan
spellingShingle Hasanali Aliakbariyan
The criterion of distributive justice in economics and politics
علوم سیاسی
: distributive justice
islamic economics
economic policy
public sufficiency
wealth distribution
author_facet Hasanali Aliakbariyan
author_sort Hasanali Aliakbariyan
title The criterion of distributive justice in economics and politics
title_short The criterion of distributive justice in economics and politics
title_full The criterion of distributive justice in economics and politics
title_fullStr The criterion of distributive justice in economics and politics
title_full_unstemmed The criterion of distributive justice in economics and politics
title_sort criterion of distributive justice in economics and politics
publisher Bagher al-Olum University
series علوم سیاسی
issn 1735-0557
2645-5773
publishDate 2020-02-01
description The purpose of the present study is to investigate the criteria of distributive justice in economics and politics. We have therefore attempted to answer the question: "What good in government should be distributed fairly and what is the criterion of fair distribution?" In this essay, we first examine the two "assignmentist" and "consequentialist" views on distributive justice and discuss the relationship between assignments and outcome in distributive justice. Next, the relationship between distributive justice and other Islamic economic goals was studied, and distributive justice was analyzed in two areas: "providing public welfare" and "moderating wealth". The results suggested that the government should distribute its possessions and opportunities under the two rules of "providing public welfare" and "wealth adjustment". This criterion is conclusive; the findings also indicate that "task-oriented" norms such as equality, entitlement and need, or a combination of them, are not effective in today's societies. Distributive justice in the non-economic domain can also be pursued in other social areas - such as politics.
topic : distributive justice
islamic economics
economic policy
public sufficiency
wealth distribution
url http://psq.bou.ac.ir/article_68432_455ac169827a03c79187685af9a14937.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanalialiakbariyan thecriterionofdistributivejusticeineconomicsandpolitics
AT hasanalialiakbariyan criterionofdistributivejusticeineconomicsandpolitics
_version_ 1724667380383088640