Primitivism in We and Brave New World / Biz ve Cesur Yeni Dünya’da İlkelcilik

With reference to the conceptual distinctions on the primitivist way of thinking by Arthur O. Lovejoy and George Boas, the aim of this article is to make a comparative analysis of primitivist thought in My (We) of Yevgeny Zamyatin and Brave New World of Aldous Huxley. Literary and philosophical p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hakan Çörekçioğlu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cyprus International University 2016-05-01
Series:Folklor/Edebiyat
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.folkloredebiyat.org/Makaleler/637582696_fe-86-6.pdf
id doaj-85306f5b7b0a4c97bb0d0e2d7403e9bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85306f5b7b0a4c97bb0d0e2d7403e9bf2020-11-25T02:20:49ZengCyprus International UniversityFolklor/Edebiyat1300-74911300-74912016-05-01228693108Primitivism in We and Brave New World / Biz ve Cesur Yeni Dünya’da İlkelcilikHakan Çörekçioğlu0* Doç. Dr. Hakan Çörekçioğlu, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat Bl. Öğretim Üyesi. With reference to the conceptual distinctions on the primitivist way of thinking by Arthur O. Lovejoy and George Boas, the aim of this article is to make a comparative analysis of primitivist thought in My (We) of Yevgeny Zamyatin and Brave New World of Aldous Huxley. Literary and philosophical primitivism is an immanent tendency in the history of Western thought, and, with its various versions, it leaves its mark on literary dystopia in the twentieth century. Primitivist discourse appears in We within the narrative of Mephi, as well as in Brave New World’s narrative of Malpais. In the context of the theme of travel peculiar to utopian fiction, Mephi and Malpais represent return to nature from civilization. Both narratives have hard primitivist content, but this primitivism is fictionalised positively in the Mephi narrative, whereas it is negative in Malpais. In spite of this disparity, the primitivist way of thinking is employed in both texts as a critical norm aganist the current state. Thus, the primitivist discourse in We and in Brave New World turns into a starting point of the criticisim against scientific and technocratic totalitarianism. However, this primitivist discourse does not transform into a call of return to nature in both texts. We indicates the possibility of a synthesis between nature and culture by employing primitivism positively. Thus Zamyatin’s novel affirms a cultural order in which different aspects of human nature, that is, pathos and logos, are reconciled with each other. Conversely, Huxley’s novel includes a defence of culture by employing primitivism negatively, namely by developing an antiprimitivist discourse. Thus, returning to an ancient tradition and its prominent representative, Renaissance and Shakespeare, Brave New World affirms the moral consciousness against cultural evil. Accordingly, the alternative cultural order of We relies on the reunion of the natural and the cultural, but the alternative of Brave New World is the reformation of culture still with aid of the cultural.http://www.folkloredebiyat.org/Makaleler/637582696_fe-86-6.pdfdystopiaanti-primitivismShakespeareculturenoble savage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hakan Çörekçioğlu
spellingShingle Hakan Çörekçioğlu
Primitivism in We and Brave New World / Biz ve Cesur Yeni Dünya’da İlkelcilik
Folklor/Edebiyat
dystopia
anti-primitivism
Shakespeare
culture
noble savage
author_facet Hakan Çörekçioğlu
author_sort Hakan Çörekçioğlu
title Primitivism in We and Brave New World / Biz ve Cesur Yeni Dünya’da İlkelcilik
title_short Primitivism in We and Brave New World / Biz ve Cesur Yeni Dünya’da İlkelcilik
title_full Primitivism in We and Brave New World / Biz ve Cesur Yeni Dünya’da İlkelcilik
title_fullStr Primitivism in We and Brave New World / Biz ve Cesur Yeni Dünya’da İlkelcilik
title_full_unstemmed Primitivism in We and Brave New World / Biz ve Cesur Yeni Dünya’da İlkelcilik
title_sort primitivism in we and brave new world / biz ve cesur yeni dünya’da i̇lkelcilik
publisher Cyprus International University
series Folklor/Edebiyat
issn 1300-7491
1300-7491
publishDate 2016-05-01
description With reference to the conceptual distinctions on the primitivist way of thinking by Arthur O. Lovejoy and George Boas, the aim of this article is to make a comparative analysis of primitivist thought in My (We) of Yevgeny Zamyatin and Brave New World of Aldous Huxley. Literary and philosophical primitivism is an immanent tendency in the history of Western thought, and, with its various versions, it leaves its mark on literary dystopia in the twentieth century. Primitivist discourse appears in We within the narrative of Mephi, as well as in Brave New World’s narrative of Malpais. In the context of the theme of travel peculiar to utopian fiction, Mephi and Malpais represent return to nature from civilization. Both narratives have hard primitivist content, but this primitivism is fictionalised positively in the Mephi narrative, whereas it is negative in Malpais. In spite of this disparity, the primitivist way of thinking is employed in both texts as a critical norm aganist the current state. Thus, the primitivist discourse in We and in Brave New World turns into a starting point of the criticisim against scientific and technocratic totalitarianism. However, this primitivist discourse does not transform into a call of return to nature in both texts. We indicates the possibility of a synthesis between nature and culture by employing primitivism positively. Thus Zamyatin’s novel affirms a cultural order in which different aspects of human nature, that is, pathos and logos, are reconciled with each other. Conversely, Huxley’s novel includes a defence of culture by employing primitivism negatively, namely by developing an antiprimitivist discourse. Thus, returning to an ancient tradition and its prominent representative, Renaissance and Shakespeare, Brave New World affirms the moral consciousness against cultural evil. Accordingly, the alternative cultural order of We relies on the reunion of the natural and the cultural, but the alternative of Brave New World is the reformation of culture still with aid of the cultural.
topic dystopia
anti-primitivism
Shakespeare
culture
noble savage
url http://www.folkloredebiyat.org/Makaleler/637582696_fe-86-6.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hakancorekcioglu primitivisminweandbravenewworldbizvecesuryenidunyadailkelcilik
_version_ 1724869647571877888