Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Plain abdominal radiography (PAR) is routinely performed in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to (1) identify the indications for PAR in EDs and compare them against international guidelines, (2) uncover predictors of non-compliance with guidelines, and (3) describe t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christophe L. Bertin, Simon Ponthus, Hari Vivekanantham, Pierre-Alexandre Poletti, Omar Kherad, Olivier T. Rutschmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-01-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-3870-2
id doaj-856106823a1644c599f9f9701cc956ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-856106823a1644c599f9f9701cc956ad2020-11-25T01:13:46ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632019-01-011911710.1186/s12913-019-3870-2Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort studyChristophe L. Bertin0Simon Ponthus1Hari Vivekanantham2Pierre-Alexandre Poletti3Omar Kherad4Olivier T. Rutschmann5Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva UniversityDivision of Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la TourDivision of Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la TourDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva UniversityDivision of Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Tour and School of MedicineDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva UniversityAbstract Background Plain abdominal radiography (PAR) is routinely performed in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to (1) identify the indications for PAR in EDs and compare them against international guidelines, (2) uncover predictors of non-compliance with guidelines, and (3) describe the use of additional radiological examinations in EDs. Methods Retrospective cohort study in the EDs of two hospitals in Geneva, Switzerland, including all adult patients who underwent PAR in the EDs. Indications were considered “appropriate” if complying with guidelines. Predictors of non-compliance were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Over 1 year, PAR was performed in 1997 patients (2.2% of all admissions). Their mean age was 59.7 years, with 53.1% of female patients. The most common indications were constipation (30.8%), suspected ileus (28.9%), and abdominal pain (15.3%). According to the French and American guidelines, only 11.8% of the PARs were indicated, while 46.2% of them complied with the Australian and British guidelines. On multivariate analysis, admission to the private hospital ED (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% CI 1.78–8.45), female gender (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.46–2.59), and an age >  65 years (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.74–3.32) were associated with a higher risk of inappropriate PAR. Additional radiological examinations were performed in 73.7% of patients. Conclusions Most indications for PAR did not comply with guidelines and elderly women appeared particularly at risk of being exposed to inappropriate examination. PAR did not prevent the need for additional examinations. Local guidelines should be developed, and initiatives should be implemented to reduce unnecessary PARs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02980081.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-3870-2Plain X-rayAbdomenEmergency department
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christophe L. Bertin
Simon Ponthus
Hari Vivekanantham
Pierre-Alexandre Poletti
Omar Kherad
Olivier T. Rutschmann
spellingShingle Christophe L. Bertin
Simon Ponthus
Hari Vivekanantham
Pierre-Alexandre Poletti
Omar Kherad
Olivier T. Rutschmann
Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
BMC Health Services Research
Plain X-ray
Abdomen
Emergency department
author_facet Christophe L. Bertin
Simon Ponthus
Hari Vivekanantham
Pierre-Alexandre Poletti
Omar Kherad
Olivier T. Rutschmann
author_sort Christophe L. Bertin
title Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Abstract Background Plain abdominal radiography (PAR) is routinely performed in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to (1) identify the indications for PAR in EDs and compare them against international guidelines, (2) uncover predictors of non-compliance with guidelines, and (3) describe the use of additional radiological examinations in EDs. Methods Retrospective cohort study in the EDs of two hospitals in Geneva, Switzerland, including all adult patients who underwent PAR in the EDs. Indications were considered “appropriate” if complying with guidelines. Predictors of non-compliance were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Over 1 year, PAR was performed in 1997 patients (2.2% of all admissions). Their mean age was 59.7 years, with 53.1% of female patients. The most common indications were constipation (30.8%), suspected ileus (28.9%), and abdominal pain (15.3%). According to the French and American guidelines, only 11.8% of the PARs were indicated, while 46.2% of them complied with the Australian and British guidelines. On multivariate analysis, admission to the private hospital ED (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% CI 1.78–8.45), female gender (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.46–2.59), and an age >  65 years (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.74–3.32) were associated with a higher risk of inappropriate PAR. Additional radiological examinations were performed in 73.7% of patients. Conclusions Most indications for PAR did not comply with guidelines and elderly women appeared particularly at risk of being exposed to inappropriate examination. PAR did not prevent the need for additional examinations. Local guidelines should be developed, and initiatives should be implemented to reduce unnecessary PARs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02980081.
topic Plain X-ray
Abdomen
Emergency department
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-3870-2
work_keys_str_mv AT christophelbertin overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT simonponthus overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT harivivekanantham overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT pierrealexandrepoletti overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT omarkherad overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT oliviertrutschmann overuseofplainabdominalradiographyinemergencydepartmentsaretrospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1725160056126701568