Outcomes of cataract surgery in a rural and urban south Indian population

<b>Purpose:</b> To assess the visual outcome after cataract surgery in a south Indian population. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Population-based cross-sectional study of subjects aged 40 years or more. Three thousand nine hundred and twenty-four rural subjects from 27 cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vijaya Lingam, George Ronnie, Rashima A, Raju Prema, Arvind Hemamalini, Baskaran Mani, Ve Ramesh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2010;volume=58;issue=3;spage=223;epage=228;aulast=Vijaya
Description
Summary:<b>Purpose:</b> To assess the visual outcome after cataract surgery in a south Indian population. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Population-based cross-sectional study of subjects aged 40 years or more. Three thousand nine hundred and twenty-four rural subjects from 27 contiguous villages and 3850 urban subjects from five randomly selected divisions were studied. All subjects underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination that included visual acuity, refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and dilated retinal examination. <b> Statistical Analysis:</b> Chi square test, <i>t</i> test and multivariate analysis were used.<b> Results:</b> Five hundred and twenty-eight (216 males, 312 females, 781 eyes) rural subjects (13.5&#x0025;, 95&#x0025; confidence interval (CI) 12.4&#x0025; to 14.6&#x0025;) and 406 (197 males, 209 females, 604 eyes) urban subjects (10.5&#x0025;, 95&#x0025; CI 9.6-11.5&#x0025;) had undergone cataract surgery. Outcome of cataract surgery was defined based on visual acuity. Using best-corrected visual acuity for classification, the single most important cause for visual impairment was cystoid macular edema in the aphakic group and posterior capsule opacification in the pseudophakic group. Aphakia (visual acuity of &lt; 20/60 to &#8804; 20/400 - odds ratio (OR) 1.8; 95&#x0025; CI 1.3 to 2.6&#x0025;, visual acuity of &lt; 20/400 - OR 6.2; 95&#x0025; 4.0 to 9.8&#x0025;), rural residence (visual acuity of &lt; 20/60 to &#8804; 20/400 - OR 3.2; 95&#x0025; CI 2.2 to 4.5&#x0025; and visual acuity of &lt; 20/400 - OR OR 3.5; 95&#x0025; CI 2.3 to 5.5&#x0025;) were associated with visual impairment. The urban cataract-operated population had significantly more pseudophakics (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), men (<i> P</i> = 0.02) and literates (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001). In the rural group the prevalence of cataract surgery (13.5&#x0025; vs. 10.5&#x0025;, <i> P</i> &lt; 0.001) and number of people that had undergone cataract surgery within three years prior to examination (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001) were significantly greater. In 30&#x0025; of rural and 16&#x0025; of urban subjects uncorrected refraction was the cause of visual impairment. <b> Conclusions:</b> Surgery-related complications were major causes for visual acuity of &lt; 20/60.
ISSN:0301-4738
1998-3689