The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure

Background: The use of temporary or permanent venous catheters in patients with renal failure has been increased recently. Therefore, familiarity with their clinical applications and complications is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the complications and effectiveness of temporary and permane...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Akbar Beigi, Hafiz Ghaheri, Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi, Leila Alavi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Vesnu Publications 2012-01-01
Series:مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/687
id doaj-85e78d82d24c433a9e424aa9547681fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85e78d82d24c433a9e424aa9547681fd2020-11-24T21:10:32ZfasVesnu Publications مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان1027-75951735-854X2012-01-012916320112017802The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal FailureAli Akbar Beigi0Hafiz Ghaheri1Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi2Leila Alavi3Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranResident, Department of General Surgery, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranGeneral Practitioner, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranBackground: The use of temporary or permanent venous catheters in patients with renal failure has been increased recently. Therefore, familiarity with their clinical applications and complications is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the complications and effectiveness of temporary and permanent venous catheters. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in Alzahra Hospital during 2006-2008. Patients with renal failure candidate for placement of either permanent or temporary central venous catheter were evaluated for early and delayed complications immediately after placement, as well as one and four weeks afterward. Data was analyzed using chi-square test in SPSS16. P values less than 0.05 were considered as significant. Findings: Overall, 114 patients with temporary and 129 patients with permanent catheters participated in this study. The majority of complications among the temporary catheter group were infection (15.3%) and bleeding (5.4%). In the permanent catheter group, the most frequent complications were infection (13.6%) and venous thrombosis (13.6%). Venous thrombosis rate in the temporary catheter group was significantly lower than the permanent catheter group (P < 0.01). The frequency of catheter malfunctions in the temporary and permanent catheter groups were 23.4 % and 6.4%, respectively. Therefore, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Since permanent catheters have prolonged and better function than temporary catheters, they are the first and best method of central venous catheterizing for hemodialysis. However, due to the lower venous thrombosis rates of temporary catheters, they are preferred in patients with proper indications for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) until the maturation of AVF.http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/687ComplicationEfficacyTemporary central venous catheterPermanent central venous catheterHemodialysis
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Akbar Beigi
Hafiz Ghaheri
Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi
Leila Alavi
spellingShingle Ali Akbar Beigi
Hafiz Ghaheri
Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi
Leila Alavi
The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure
مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
Complication
Efficacy
Temporary central venous catheter
Permanent central venous catheter
Hemodialysis
author_facet Ali Akbar Beigi
Hafiz Ghaheri
Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi
Leila Alavi
author_sort Ali Akbar Beigi
title The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure
title_short The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure
title_full The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure
title_sort efficacy and complications of temporary and permanent central venous catheters in patients with renal failure
publisher Vesnu Publications
series مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
issn 1027-7595
1735-854X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Background: The use of temporary or permanent venous catheters in patients with renal failure has been increased recently. Therefore, familiarity with their clinical applications and complications is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the complications and effectiveness of temporary and permanent venous catheters. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in Alzahra Hospital during 2006-2008. Patients with renal failure candidate for placement of either permanent or temporary central venous catheter were evaluated for early and delayed complications immediately after placement, as well as one and four weeks afterward. Data was analyzed using chi-square test in SPSS16. P values less than 0.05 were considered as significant. Findings: Overall, 114 patients with temporary and 129 patients with permanent catheters participated in this study. The majority of complications among the temporary catheter group were infection (15.3%) and bleeding (5.4%). In the permanent catheter group, the most frequent complications were infection (13.6%) and venous thrombosis (13.6%). Venous thrombosis rate in the temporary catheter group was significantly lower than the permanent catheter group (P < 0.01). The frequency of catheter malfunctions in the temporary and permanent catheter groups were 23.4 % and 6.4%, respectively. Therefore, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Since permanent catheters have prolonged and better function than temporary catheters, they are the first and best method of central venous catheterizing for hemodialysis. However, due to the lower venous thrombosis rates of temporary catheters, they are preferred in patients with proper indications for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) until the maturation of AVF.
topic Complication
Efficacy
Temporary central venous catheter
Permanent central venous catheter
Hemodialysis
url http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/687
work_keys_str_mv AT aliakbarbeigi theefficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure
AT hafizghaheri theefficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure
AT amirhosseindavarpanahjazi theefficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure
AT leilaalavi theefficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure
AT aliakbarbeigi efficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure
AT hafizghaheri efficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure
AT amirhosseindavarpanahjazi efficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure
AT leilaalavi efficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure
_version_ 1716756233772335104