The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure
Background: The use of temporary or permanent venous catheters in patients with renal failure has been increased recently. Therefore, familiarity with their clinical applications and complications is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the complications and effectiveness of temporary and permane...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Vesnu Publications
2012-01-01
|
Series: | مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/687 |
id |
doaj-85e78d82d24c433a9e424aa9547681fd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-85e78d82d24c433a9e424aa9547681fd2020-11-24T21:10:32ZfasVesnu Publications مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان1027-75951735-854X2012-01-012916320112017802The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal FailureAli Akbar Beigi0Hafiz Ghaheri1Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi2Leila Alavi3Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranResident, Department of General Surgery, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranGeneral Practitioner, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranBackground: The use of temporary or permanent venous catheters in patients with renal failure has been increased recently. Therefore, familiarity with their clinical applications and complications is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the complications and effectiveness of temporary and permanent venous catheters. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in Alzahra Hospital during 2006-2008. Patients with renal failure candidate for placement of either permanent or temporary central venous catheter were evaluated for early and delayed complications immediately after placement, as well as one and four weeks afterward. Data was analyzed using chi-square test in SPSS16. P values less than 0.05 were considered as significant. Findings: Overall, 114 patients with temporary and 129 patients with permanent catheters participated in this study. The majority of complications among the temporary catheter group were infection (15.3%) and bleeding (5.4%). In the permanent catheter group, the most frequent complications were infection (13.6%) and venous thrombosis (13.6%). Venous thrombosis rate in the temporary catheter group was significantly lower than the permanent catheter group (P < 0.01). The frequency of catheter malfunctions in the temporary and permanent catheter groups were 23.4 % and 6.4%, respectively. Therefore, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Since permanent catheters have prolonged and better function than temporary catheters, they are the first and best method of central venous catheterizing for hemodialysis. However, due to the lower venous thrombosis rates of temporary catheters, they are preferred in patients with proper indications for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) until the maturation of AVF.http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/687ComplicationEfficacyTemporary central venous catheterPermanent central venous catheterHemodialysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ali Akbar Beigi Hafiz Ghaheri Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi Leila Alavi |
spellingShingle |
Ali Akbar Beigi Hafiz Ghaheri Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi Leila Alavi The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان Complication Efficacy Temporary central venous catheter Permanent central venous catheter Hemodialysis |
author_facet |
Ali Akbar Beigi Hafiz Ghaheri Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi Leila Alavi |
author_sort |
Ali Akbar Beigi |
title |
The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure |
title_short |
The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure |
title_full |
The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure |
title_fullStr |
The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Efficacy and Complications of Temporary and Permanent Central Venous Catheters in Patients with Renal Failure |
title_sort |
efficacy and complications of temporary and permanent central venous catheters in patients with renal failure |
publisher |
Vesnu Publications |
series |
مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان |
issn |
1027-7595 1735-854X |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
Background: The use of temporary or permanent venous catheters in patients with renal failure has been increased recently. Therefore, familiarity with their clinical applications and complications is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the complications and effectiveness of temporary and permanent venous catheters.
Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in Alzahra Hospital during 2006-2008. Patients with renal failure candidate for placement of either permanent or temporary central venous catheter were evaluated for early and delayed complications immediately after placement, as well as one and four weeks afterward. Data was analyzed using chi-square test in SPSS16. P values less than 0.05 were considered as significant.
Findings: Overall, 114 patients with temporary and 129 patients with permanent catheters participated in this study. The majority of complications among the temporary catheter group were infection (15.3%) and bleeding (5.4%). In the permanent catheter group, the most frequent complications were infection (13.6%) and venous thrombosis (13.6%). Venous thrombosis rate in the temporary catheter group was significantly lower than the permanent catheter group (P < 0.01). The frequency of catheter malfunctions in the temporary and permanent catheter groups were 23.4 % and 6.4%, respectively. Therefore, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Since permanent catheters have prolonged and better function than temporary catheters, they are the first and best method of central venous catheterizing for hemodialysis. However, due to the lower venous thrombosis rates of temporary catheters, they are preferred in patients with proper indications for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) until the maturation of AVF. |
topic |
Complication Efficacy Temporary central venous catheter Permanent central venous catheter Hemodialysis |
url |
http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/687 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aliakbarbeigi theefficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure AT hafizghaheri theefficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure AT amirhosseindavarpanahjazi theefficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure AT leilaalavi theefficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure AT aliakbarbeigi efficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure AT hafizghaheri efficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure AT amirhosseindavarpanahjazi efficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure AT leilaalavi efficacyandcomplicationsoftemporaryandpermanentcentralvenouscathetersinpatientswithrenalfailure |
_version_ |
1716756233772335104 |