Performance of the Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score in Identifying Prevalent Diabetes in Tamil Nadu, India

BackgroundThe Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score (AMCDRS), which was developed in rural Kerala State, South India, had not previously been externally validated. We examined the performance of the AMCDRS in urban and rural areas in the district of Vellore in the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anu Mary Oommen, Vinod Joseph Abraham, Thirunavukkarasu Sathish, V. Jacob Jose, Kuryan George
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Diabetes Association 2017-08-01
Series:Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://e-dmj.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2004DMJ/dmj-41-386.pdf
id doaj-85ee539f5ea642f8ac89de5c268ba2d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85ee539f5ea642f8ac89de5c268ba2d62020-11-24T22:21:09ZengKorean Diabetes AssociationDiabetes & Metabolism Journal2233-60792233-60872017-08-0141538639210.4093/dmj.2017.41.5.386Performance of the Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score in Identifying Prevalent Diabetes in Tamil Nadu, IndiaAnu Mary Oommen0Vinod Joseph Abraham1Thirunavukkarasu Sathish2V. Jacob Jose3Kuryan George4Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.Centre for Population Health Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.Department of Cardiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.BackgroundThe Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score (AMCDRS), which was developed in rural Kerala State, South India, had not previously been externally validated. We examined the performance of the AMCDRS in urban and rural areas in the district of Vellore in the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu, and compared it with other diabetes risk scores developed from India.MethodsWe used the data from 4,896 participants (30 to 64 years) of a cross-sectional study conducted in Vellore (2010 to 2012), to calculate the AMCDRS scores using age, family history, and waist circumference. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC) were calculated for undiagnosed and total diabetes.ResultsOf the 4,896 individuals surveyed, 274 (5.6%) had undiagnosed diabetes and 759 (15.5%) had total diabetes. The AMCDRS, with an optimum cut-point of ≥4, identified 45.0% for further testing with 59.5% sensitivity, 60.5% specificity, 9.1% PPV, 95.8% NPV, and an AROC of 0.639 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.608 to 0.670) for undiagnosed diabetes. The corresponding figures for total diabetes were 75.1%, 60.5%, 25.9%, 93.0%, and 0.731 (95% CI, 0.713 to 0.750), respectively. The AROC for the AMCDRS was not significantly different from that of the Indian Diabetes Risk Score, the Ramachandran or the Chaturvedi risk scores for total diabetes, but was significantly lower than the AROC of the Chaturvedi score for undiagnosed diabetes.ConclusionThe AMCDRS is a simple diabetes risk score that can be used to screen for undiagnosed and total diabetes in low-resource primary care settings in India. However, it probably requires recalibration to improve its performance for undiagnosed diabetes.https://e-dmj.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2004DMJ/dmj-41-386.pdfDiabetesRisk scoreUndiagnosedUniversal screening
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anu Mary Oommen
Vinod Joseph Abraham
Thirunavukkarasu Sathish
V. Jacob Jose
Kuryan George
spellingShingle Anu Mary Oommen
Vinod Joseph Abraham
Thirunavukkarasu Sathish
V. Jacob Jose
Kuryan George
Performance of the Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score in Identifying Prevalent Diabetes in Tamil Nadu, India
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Diabetes
Risk score
Undiagnosed
Universal screening
author_facet Anu Mary Oommen
Vinod Joseph Abraham
Thirunavukkarasu Sathish
V. Jacob Jose
Kuryan George
author_sort Anu Mary Oommen
title Performance of the Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score in Identifying Prevalent Diabetes in Tamil Nadu, India
title_short Performance of the Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score in Identifying Prevalent Diabetes in Tamil Nadu, India
title_full Performance of the Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score in Identifying Prevalent Diabetes in Tamil Nadu, India
title_fullStr Performance of the Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score in Identifying Prevalent Diabetes in Tamil Nadu, India
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score in Identifying Prevalent Diabetes in Tamil Nadu, India
title_sort performance of the achutha menon centre diabetes risk score in identifying prevalent diabetes in tamil nadu, india
publisher Korean Diabetes Association
series Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
issn 2233-6079
2233-6087
publishDate 2017-08-01
description BackgroundThe Achutha Menon Centre Diabetes Risk Score (AMCDRS), which was developed in rural Kerala State, South India, had not previously been externally validated. We examined the performance of the AMCDRS in urban and rural areas in the district of Vellore in the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu, and compared it with other diabetes risk scores developed from India.MethodsWe used the data from 4,896 participants (30 to 64 years) of a cross-sectional study conducted in Vellore (2010 to 2012), to calculate the AMCDRS scores using age, family history, and waist circumference. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC) were calculated for undiagnosed and total diabetes.ResultsOf the 4,896 individuals surveyed, 274 (5.6%) had undiagnosed diabetes and 759 (15.5%) had total diabetes. The AMCDRS, with an optimum cut-point of ≥4, identified 45.0% for further testing with 59.5% sensitivity, 60.5% specificity, 9.1% PPV, 95.8% NPV, and an AROC of 0.639 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.608 to 0.670) for undiagnosed diabetes. The corresponding figures for total diabetes were 75.1%, 60.5%, 25.9%, 93.0%, and 0.731 (95% CI, 0.713 to 0.750), respectively. The AROC for the AMCDRS was not significantly different from that of the Indian Diabetes Risk Score, the Ramachandran or the Chaturvedi risk scores for total diabetes, but was significantly lower than the AROC of the Chaturvedi score for undiagnosed diabetes.ConclusionThe AMCDRS is a simple diabetes risk score that can be used to screen for undiagnosed and total diabetes in low-resource primary care settings in India. However, it probably requires recalibration to improve its performance for undiagnosed diabetes.
topic Diabetes
Risk score
Undiagnosed
Universal screening
url https://e-dmj.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2004DMJ/dmj-41-386.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anumaryoommen performanceoftheachuthamenoncentrediabetesriskscoreinidentifyingprevalentdiabetesintamilnaduindia
AT vinodjosephabraham performanceoftheachuthamenoncentrediabetesriskscoreinidentifyingprevalentdiabetesintamilnaduindia
AT thirunavukkarasusathish performanceoftheachuthamenoncentrediabetesriskscoreinidentifyingprevalentdiabetesintamilnaduindia
AT vjacobjose performanceoftheachuthamenoncentrediabetesriskscoreinidentifyingprevalentdiabetesintamilnaduindia
AT kuryangeorge performanceoftheachuthamenoncentrediabetesriskscoreinidentifyingprevalentdiabetesintamilnaduindia
_version_ 1725771925745041408