Photoelastic Analysis of Fixed Partial Prosthesis Crown Height and Implant Length on Distribution of Stress in Two Dental Implant Systems

The aim of this study was to evaluate by photoelastic analysis stress distribution on short and long implants of two dental implant systems with 2-unit implant-supported fixed partial prostheses of 8 mm and 13 mm heights. Sixteen photoelastic models were divided into 4 groups: I: long implant (5×11 ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evandro Portela Figueirêdo, Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez, Marcele Jardim Pimentel, Ana Regina Oliveira Moreira, Mauro Antônio de Arruda Nóbilo, José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/206723
id doaj-8611f51d302c4d05b10e52818f943ce0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8611f51d302c4d05b10e52818f943ce02020-11-24T20:45:13ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362014-01-01201410.1155/2014/206723206723Photoelastic Analysis of Fixed Partial Prosthesis Crown Height and Implant Length on Distribution of Stress in Two Dental Implant SystemsEvandro Portela Figueirêdo0Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez1Marcele Jardim Pimentel2Ana Regina Oliveira Moreira3Mauro Antônio de Arruda Nóbilo4José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa5Department of Odontology, Unified University Center of Maranhão (UNICEUMA), 65.075-120 São Luís, MA, BrazilDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Piracicaba Dental School, P.O. Box 52, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 13414-903 Piracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Prosthesis and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, P.O. Box 52, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 13414-903 Piracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Prosthesis and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, P.O. Box 52, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 13414-903 Piracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Prosthesis and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, P.O. Box 52, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 13414-903 Piracicaba, SP, BrazilDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Piracicaba Dental School, P.O. Box 52, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 13414-903 Piracicaba, SP, BrazilThe aim of this study was to evaluate by photoelastic analysis stress distribution on short and long implants of two dental implant systems with 2-unit implant-supported fixed partial prostheses of 8 mm and 13 mm heights. Sixteen photoelastic models were divided into 4 groups: I: long implant (5×11 mm) (Neodent), II: long implant (5×11 mm) (Bicon), III: short implant (5×6 mm) (Neodent), and IV: short implants (5×6 mm) (Bicon). The models were positioned in a circular polariscope associated with a cell load and static axial (0.5 Kgf) and nonaxial load (15°, 0.5 Kgf) were applied to each group for both prosthetic crown heights. Three-way ANOVA was used to compare the factors implant length, crown height, and implant system (α=0.05). The results showed that implant length was a statistically significant factor for both axial and nonaxial loading. The 13 mm prosthetic crown did not result in statistically significant differences in stress distribution between the implant systems and implant lengths studied, regardless of load type (P>0.05). It can be concluded that short implants showed higher stress levels than long implants. Implant system and length was not relevant factors when prosthetic crown height were increased.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/206723
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Evandro Portela Figueirêdo
Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez
Marcele Jardim Pimentel
Ana Regina Oliveira Moreira
Mauro Antônio de Arruda Nóbilo
José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa
spellingShingle Evandro Portela Figueirêdo
Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez
Marcele Jardim Pimentel
Ana Regina Oliveira Moreira
Mauro Antônio de Arruda Nóbilo
José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa
Photoelastic Analysis of Fixed Partial Prosthesis Crown Height and Implant Length on Distribution of Stress in Two Dental Implant Systems
International Journal of Dentistry
author_facet Evandro Portela Figueirêdo
Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez
Marcele Jardim Pimentel
Ana Regina Oliveira Moreira
Mauro Antônio de Arruda Nóbilo
José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa
author_sort Evandro Portela Figueirêdo
title Photoelastic Analysis of Fixed Partial Prosthesis Crown Height and Implant Length on Distribution of Stress in Two Dental Implant Systems
title_short Photoelastic Analysis of Fixed Partial Prosthesis Crown Height and Implant Length on Distribution of Stress in Two Dental Implant Systems
title_full Photoelastic Analysis of Fixed Partial Prosthesis Crown Height and Implant Length on Distribution of Stress in Two Dental Implant Systems
title_fullStr Photoelastic Analysis of Fixed Partial Prosthesis Crown Height and Implant Length on Distribution of Stress in Two Dental Implant Systems
title_full_unstemmed Photoelastic Analysis of Fixed Partial Prosthesis Crown Height and Implant Length on Distribution of Stress in Two Dental Implant Systems
title_sort photoelastic analysis of fixed partial prosthesis crown height and implant length on distribution of stress in two dental implant systems
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Dentistry
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The aim of this study was to evaluate by photoelastic analysis stress distribution on short and long implants of two dental implant systems with 2-unit implant-supported fixed partial prostheses of 8 mm and 13 mm heights. Sixteen photoelastic models were divided into 4 groups: I: long implant (5×11 mm) (Neodent), II: long implant (5×11 mm) (Bicon), III: short implant (5×6 mm) (Neodent), and IV: short implants (5×6 mm) (Bicon). The models were positioned in a circular polariscope associated with a cell load and static axial (0.5 Kgf) and nonaxial load (15°, 0.5 Kgf) were applied to each group for both prosthetic crown heights. Three-way ANOVA was used to compare the factors implant length, crown height, and implant system (α=0.05). The results showed that implant length was a statistically significant factor for both axial and nonaxial loading. The 13 mm prosthetic crown did not result in statistically significant differences in stress distribution between the implant systems and implant lengths studied, regardless of load type (P>0.05). It can be concluded that short implants showed higher stress levels than long implants. Implant system and length was not relevant factors when prosthetic crown height were increased.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/206723
work_keys_str_mv AT evandroportelafigueiredo photoelasticanalysisoffixedpartialprosthesiscrownheightandimplantlengthondistributionofstressintwodentalimplantsystems
AT ederalbertosiguarodriguez photoelasticanalysisoffixedpartialprosthesiscrownheightandimplantlengthondistributionofstressintwodentalimplantsystems
AT marcelejardimpimentel photoelasticanalysisoffixedpartialprosthesiscrownheightandimplantlengthondistributionofstressintwodentalimplantsystems
AT anareginaoliveiramoreira photoelasticanalysisoffixedpartialprosthesiscrownheightandimplantlengthondistributionofstressintwodentalimplantsystems
AT mauroantoniodearrudanobilo photoelasticanalysisoffixedpartialprosthesiscrownheightandimplantlengthondistributionofstressintwodentalimplantsystems
AT josericardodealbergariabarbosa photoelasticanalysisoffixedpartialprosthesiscrownheightandimplantlengthondistributionofstressintwodentalimplantsystems
_version_ 1716815037264297984