Extension of the TOPSIS Considering the Dispersion among the Criteria of Each Alternative

TOPSIS is located in compensatory decision-making methods. The basic principle is that the chosen alternative should have the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative ideal solution. The existence of incremental and decreasing uniform trend in pos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siamak Kheybari, Mostafa Kazemi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2018-07-01
Series:Muṭāli̒āt-i Mudīriyyat-i Ṣan̒atī
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jims.atu.ac.ir/article_8790_8ceb89f107161acd8a0be690ade61589.pdf
id doaj-862587d2a4804a0eb3cca5576b309f4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-862587d2a4804a0eb3cca5576b309f4f2020-11-24T23:09:40ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressMuṭāli̒āt-i Mudīriyyat-i Ṣan̒atī2251-80292018-07-01164919921910.22054/JIMS.2018.8790 Extension of the TOPSIS Considering the Dispersion among the Criteria of Each AlternativeSiamak Kheybari Mostafa KazemiTOPSIS is located in compensatory decision-making methods. The basic principle is that the chosen alternative should have the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative ideal solution. The existence of incremental and decreasing uniform trend in positive and negative criteria is one of the TOPSIS characteristics in determining positive and negative ideal points. While the utility assigned to the decision maker after a certain level in each criterion will be less tangible. Therefore, in the ranking of alternatives in addition to the value of each alternative in each indicator, the balance among criteria of each alternative should be considered so the alternative that has an appropriate place in an important indicator, but does not have an appropriate place in other criteria, not to be the first chance for selecting. For this purpose, in this paper by adding virtual dimension to the decision matrix that comes from the deviations among criteria of each alternative, we have tried to compensate the mentioned weakness. To evaluate the proposed method, three different examples are presented. Thus, each of the three provided examples, solved by proposed method, TOPSIS, VIKOR, Deng and SAW and then by using the Spearman correlation coefficient the number of significant correlation relationships between the proposed method and TOPSIS with the other three methods were compared. Then, the rating similarity percentage of the proposed method and TOPSIS were compared with VIKOR, Deng and SAW. http://jims.atu.ac.ir/article_8790_8ceb89f107161acd8a0be690ade61589.pdfTOPSIS; Positive and Negative-Ideal Point; Dispersion among Criteria; Utility
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siamak Kheybari
Mostafa Kazemi
spellingShingle Siamak Kheybari
Mostafa Kazemi
Extension of the TOPSIS Considering the Dispersion among the Criteria of Each Alternative
Muṭāli̒āt-i Mudīriyyat-i Ṣan̒atī
TOPSIS; Positive and Negative-Ideal Point; Dispersion among Criteria; Utility
author_facet Siamak Kheybari
Mostafa Kazemi
author_sort Siamak Kheybari
title Extension of the TOPSIS Considering the Dispersion among the Criteria of Each Alternative
title_short Extension of the TOPSIS Considering the Dispersion among the Criteria of Each Alternative
title_full Extension of the TOPSIS Considering the Dispersion among the Criteria of Each Alternative
title_fullStr Extension of the TOPSIS Considering the Dispersion among the Criteria of Each Alternative
title_full_unstemmed Extension of the TOPSIS Considering the Dispersion among the Criteria of Each Alternative
title_sort extension of the topsis considering the dispersion among the criteria of each alternative
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
series Muṭāli̒āt-i Mudīriyyat-i Ṣan̒atī
issn 2251-8029
publishDate 2018-07-01
description TOPSIS is located in compensatory decision-making methods. The basic principle is that the chosen alternative should have the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative ideal solution. The existence of incremental and decreasing uniform trend in positive and negative criteria is one of the TOPSIS characteristics in determining positive and negative ideal points. While the utility assigned to the decision maker after a certain level in each criterion will be less tangible. Therefore, in the ranking of alternatives in addition to the value of each alternative in each indicator, the balance among criteria of each alternative should be considered so the alternative that has an appropriate place in an important indicator, but does not have an appropriate place in other criteria, not to be the first chance for selecting. For this purpose, in this paper by adding virtual dimension to the decision matrix that comes from the deviations among criteria of each alternative, we have tried to compensate the mentioned weakness. To evaluate the proposed method, three different examples are presented. Thus, each of the three provided examples, solved by proposed method, TOPSIS, VIKOR, Deng and SAW and then by using the Spearman correlation coefficient the number of significant correlation relationships between the proposed method and TOPSIS with the other three methods were compared. Then, the rating similarity percentage of the proposed method and TOPSIS were compared with VIKOR, Deng and SAW.
topic TOPSIS; Positive and Negative-Ideal Point; Dispersion among Criteria; Utility
url http://jims.atu.ac.ir/article_8790_8ceb89f107161acd8a0be690ade61589.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT siamakkheybari extensionofthetopsisconsideringthedispersionamongthecriteriaofeachalternative
AT mostafakazemi extensionofthetopsisconsideringthedispersionamongthecriteriaofeachalternative
_version_ 1725609938320883712