Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory

Schmidt et al.’s (2020) PEP model accurately reflects the complexity of task switching based on bottom-up assumptions and episodic memory, re-evaluating the contribution of commonly presumed top-down processes. Extending it to long-term bindings and their item-specific effects could eludicate puzzli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christina Pfeuffer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/110
id doaj-868f70760eea480aaef4b42e0e6f5f8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-868f70760eea480aaef4b42e0e6f5f8b2020-11-25T03:42:10ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202020-09-013110.5334/joc.110129Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic MemoryChristina Pfeuffer0University of Freiburg, Department of Psychology, FreiburgSchmidt et al.’s (2020) PEP model accurately reflects the complexity of task switching based on bottom-up assumptions and episodic memory, re-evaluating the contribution of commonly presumed top-down processes. Extending it to long-term bindings and their item-specific effects could eludicate puzzling findings regarding the independence of long-term bindings between stimuli, responses, and task-specific categorizations as well as the relation between short-term and long-term bindings. Moreover, ideomotor theories of action control provide a bottom-up basis of incorporating volition and intentional action into the PEP model which is currently restricted to stimulus-based action.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/110episodic memorybindingcognitive controlitem-specificityintentional action
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christina Pfeuffer
spellingShingle Christina Pfeuffer
Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory
Journal of Cognition
episodic memory
binding
cognitive control
item-specificity
intentional action
author_facet Christina Pfeuffer
author_sort Christina Pfeuffer
title Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory
title_short Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory
title_full Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory
title_fullStr Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory
title_full_unstemmed Item-Specificity and Intention in Episodic Memory
title_sort item-specificity and intention in episodic memory
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Cognition
issn 2514-4820
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Schmidt et al.’s (2020) PEP model accurately reflects the complexity of task switching based on bottom-up assumptions and episodic memory, re-evaluating the contribution of commonly presumed top-down processes. Extending it to long-term bindings and their item-specific effects could eludicate puzzling findings regarding the independence of long-term bindings between stimuli, responses, and task-specific categorizations as well as the relation between short-term and long-term bindings. Moreover, ideomotor theories of action control provide a bottom-up basis of incorporating volition and intentional action into the PEP model which is currently restricted to stimulus-based action.
topic episodic memory
binding
cognitive control
item-specificity
intentional action
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/110
work_keys_str_mv AT christinapfeuffer itemspecificityandintentioninepisodicmemory
_version_ 1724526757969657856