Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
Abstract Background Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery an...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w |
id |
doaj-86b6f4a9c75e42b8bb44b9e23c0b34b9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-86b6f4a9c75e42b8bb44b9e23c0b34b92021-08-01T11:46:05ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202021-07-0121111010.1186/s12909-021-02790-wTools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping reviewLouise Inkeri Hennings0Jette Led Sørensen1Jane Hybscmann2Jeanett Strandbygaard3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev HospitalJuliane Marie Centre for children, women and reproduction, RigshospitaletJuliane Marie Centre for children, women and reproduction, RigshospitaletDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, RigshospitaletAbstract Background Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery and evaluate the measurement characteristics of each tool. Method We utilized the scoping review methodology and searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were studies that analysed assessment tools in live gynaecologic surgery. Kane’s validity argument was applied to evaluate the assessment tools in the included studies. Results Eight studies out of the 544 identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The assessment tools were categorised as global rating scales, global and procedure rating scales combined, procedure-specific rating scales or as a non-procedure-specific error assessment tool. Conclusion This scoping review presents the current different tools for observational assessment of technical skills in intraoperative, gynaecologic surgery. This scoping review can serve as a guide for surgical educators who want to apply a scale or a specific tool in surgical assessment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-wAssessmentAssessment toolGynaecologySurgery |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Louise Inkeri Hennings Jette Led Sørensen Jane Hybscmann Jeanett Strandbygaard |
spellingShingle |
Louise Inkeri Hennings Jette Led Sørensen Jane Hybscmann Jeanett Strandbygaard Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review BMC Medical Education Assessment Assessment tool Gynaecology Surgery |
author_facet |
Louise Inkeri Hennings Jette Led Sørensen Jane Hybscmann Jeanett Strandbygaard |
author_sort |
Louise Inkeri Hennings |
title |
Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title_short |
Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title_full |
Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title_fullStr |
Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
title_sort |
tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Education |
issn |
1472-6920 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery and evaluate the measurement characteristics of each tool. Method We utilized the scoping review methodology and searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were studies that analysed assessment tools in live gynaecologic surgery. Kane’s validity argument was applied to evaluate the assessment tools in the included studies. Results Eight studies out of the 544 identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The assessment tools were categorised as global rating scales, global and procedure rating scales combined, procedure-specific rating scales or as a non-procedure-specific error assessment tool. Conclusion This scoping review presents the current different tools for observational assessment of technical skills in intraoperative, gynaecologic surgery. This scoping review can serve as a guide for surgical educators who want to apply a scale or a specific tool in surgical assessment. |
topic |
Assessment Assessment tool Gynaecology Surgery |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT louiseinkerihennings toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview AT jetteledsørensen toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview AT janehybscmann toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview AT jeanettstrandbygaard toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview |
_version_ |
1721245574208946176 |