Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review

Abstract Background Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louise Inkeri Hennings, Jette Led Sørensen, Jane Hybscmann, Jeanett Strandbygaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w
id doaj-86b6f4a9c75e42b8bb44b9e23c0b34b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86b6f4a9c75e42b8bb44b9e23c0b34b92021-08-01T11:46:05ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202021-07-0121111010.1186/s12909-021-02790-wTools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping reviewLouise Inkeri Hennings0Jette Led Sørensen1Jane Hybscmann2Jeanett Strandbygaard3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev HospitalJuliane Marie Centre for children, women and reproduction, RigshospitaletJuliane Marie Centre for children, women and reproduction, RigshospitaletDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, RigshospitaletAbstract Background Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery and evaluate the measurement characteristics of each tool. Method We utilized the scoping review methodology and searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were studies that analysed assessment tools in live gynaecologic surgery. Kane’s validity argument was applied to evaluate the assessment tools in the included studies. Results Eight studies out of the 544 identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The assessment tools were categorised as global rating scales, global and procedure rating scales combined, procedure-specific rating scales or as a non-procedure-specific error assessment tool. Conclusion This scoping review presents the current different tools for observational assessment of technical skills in intraoperative, gynaecologic surgery. This scoping review can serve as a guide for surgical educators who want to apply a scale or a specific tool in surgical assessment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-wAssessmentAssessment toolGynaecologySurgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Louise Inkeri Hennings
Jette Led Sørensen
Jane Hybscmann
Jeanett Strandbygaard
spellingShingle Louise Inkeri Hennings
Jette Led Sørensen
Jane Hybscmann
Jeanett Strandbygaard
Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
BMC Medical Education
Assessment
Assessment tool
Gynaecology
Surgery
author_facet Louise Inkeri Hennings
Jette Led Sørensen
Jane Hybscmann
Jeanett Strandbygaard
author_sort Louise Inkeri Hennings
title Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title_short Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title_full Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title_fullStr Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
title_sort tools for measuring technical skills during gynaecologic surgery: a scoping review
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Education
issn 1472-6920
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background Standardised assessment is key to structured surgical training. Currently, there is no consensus on which surgical assessment tool to use in live gynaecologic surgery. The purpose of this review is to identify assessment tools measuring technical skills in gynaecologic surgery and evaluate the measurement characteristics of each tool. Method We utilized the scoping review methodology and searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were studies that analysed assessment tools in live gynaecologic surgery. Kane’s validity argument was applied to evaluate the assessment tools in the included studies. Results Eight studies out of the 544 identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The assessment tools were categorised as global rating scales, global and procedure rating scales combined, procedure-specific rating scales or as a non-procedure-specific error assessment tool. Conclusion This scoping review presents the current different tools for observational assessment of technical skills in intraoperative, gynaecologic surgery. This scoping review can serve as a guide for surgical educators who want to apply a scale or a specific tool in surgical assessment.
topic Assessment
Assessment tool
Gynaecology
Surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02790-w
work_keys_str_mv AT louiseinkerihennings toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview
AT jetteledsørensen toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview
AT janehybscmann toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview
AT jeanettstrandbygaard toolsformeasuringtechnicalskillsduringgynaecologicsurgeryascopingreview
_version_ 1721245574208946176