Examination of the Clinical Queries and Systematic Review “hedges” in EMBASE and MEDLINE
Introduction – This investigation sought to determine whether the methodological search filters in place as Clinical Queries limits in OvidSP EMBASE and OvidSP MEDLINE had been modified from those written by Haynes et al. and whether the translations of these in PubMed and EBSCO MEDLINE were reliabl...
Main Author: | Susan M. Bradley |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Alberta
2014-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association |
Online Access: | https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/jchla/index.php/jchla/article/view/22511 |
Similar Items
-
Corrigendum: Examination of the Clinical Queries and Systematic Review ‘Hedges’ in EMBASE and MEDLINE
by: Susan M. Bradley
Published: (2014-07-01) -
Strategies to optimize MEDLINE and EMBASE search strategies for anesthesiology systematic reviews. An experimental study
by: Enilze de Souza Nogueira Volpato, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Has Embase replaced MEDLINE since coverage expansion?
by: Michael Thomas Lam, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Identifying observational studies of surgical interventions in MEDLINE and EMBASE
by: Burr Jennifer, et al.
Published: (2006-08-01) -
Translation of Hedges in Medical Databases to Other Platforms’ Syntax May Cause Significantly Different Search Results. A Review of: Bradley, S. M. (2010). Examination of the clinical queries and systematic review “hedges” in EMBASE and MEDLINE. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 31, 27-37.
by: Heather Ganshorn
Published: (2011-06-01)