Host–parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population

During the present study, the host–parasite relationship between mosquitoes and parasitic mites was investigated. The 8954 individuals of male and female mosquitoes belonging to 26 genera: seven each of Aedes and Culex, six of Anopheles and one each of Toxorhynchites, Coquillettidia and Uranotaenia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atwa A. Atwa, Anwar L. Bilgrami, Ahmad I.M. Al-Saggaf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia 2017-04-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Entomologia
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0085562617300092
id doaj-86e66bdf0b3d4ae0808a8ede69d9cd50
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86e66bdf0b3d4ae0808a8ede69d9cd502020-11-25T00:11:59ZengSociedade Brasileira de EntomologiaRevista Brasileira de Entomologia0085-56262017-04-01612101106Host–parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito populationAtwa A. Atwa0Anwar L. Bilgrami1Ahmad I.M. Al-Saggaf2King Abdulaziz University, Deanship of Scientific Research, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaKing Abdulaziz University, Deanship of Scientific Research, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Corresponding author.King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaDuring the present study, the host–parasite relationship between mosquitoes and parasitic mites was investigated. The 8954 individuals of male and female mosquitoes belonging to 26 genera: seven each of Aedes and Culex, six of Anopheles and one each of Toxorhynchites, Coquillettidia and Uranotaenia were collected from 200 sites. The male and female mosquitoes were collected from the State of Uttar Pradesh, located at 26.8500° N, 80.9100° E in North India by deploying Carbon dioxide-baited and gravid traps. The intensity of mite's infection, type and number of mites attached to mosquitoes, mite's preference for body parts and host sexes were the parameters used to determine host–parasite relationship. Eight species of mites: Arrenurus acuminatus, Ar. gibberifrons, Ar. danbyensis, Ar. madaraszi, Ar. kenki, Parathyas barbigera, Leptus sp., and Anystis sp., parasitized mosquitoes. Parasitic mites preferred host's thorax for attachment as compared to the head, pre-abdomen or appendages. The present study suggests phoretic relationship between parasitic mites and mosquitoes. Wide occurrence, intensity of infection, parasitic load, and attachment preferences of the mites suggested their positive role in biological control of adult mosquitoes. The present study will set the path of future studies on host–parasite relationships of mites and mosquitoes and define the role of parasitic mites in the biological control of mosquitoes. Keywords: Mosquito, Mites, Host, Parasite, Infection, Biocontrolhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0085562617300092
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Atwa A. Atwa
Anwar L. Bilgrami
Ahmad I.M. Al-Saggaf
spellingShingle Atwa A. Atwa
Anwar L. Bilgrami
Ahmad I.M. Al-Saggaf
Host–parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population
Revista Brasileira de Entomologia
author_facet Atwa A. Atwa
Anwar L. Bilgrami
Ahmad I.M. Al-Saggaf
author_sort Atwa A. Atwa
title Host–parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population
title_short Host–parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population
title_full Host–parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population
title_fullStr Host–parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population
title_full_unstemmed Host–parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population
title_sort host–parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia
series Revista Brasileira de Entomologia
issn 0085-5626
publishDate 2017-04-01
description During the present study, the host–parasite relationship between mosquitoes and parasitic mites was investigated. The 8954 individuals of male and female mosquitoes belonging to 26 genera: seven each of Aedes and Culex, six of Anopheles and one each of Toxorhynchites, Coquillettidia and Uranotaenia were collected from 200 sites. The male and female mosquitoes were collected from the State of Uttar Pradesh, located at 26.8500° N, 80.9100° E in North India by deploying Carbon dioxide-baited and gravid traps. The intensity of mite's infection, type and number of mites attached to mosquitoes, mite's preference for body parts and host sexes were the parameters used to determine host–parasite relationship. Eight species of mites: Arrenurus acuminatus, Ar. gibberifrons, Ar. danbyensis, Ar. madaraszi, Ar. kenki, Parathyas barbigera, Leptus sp., and Anystis sp., parasitized mosquitoes. Parasitic mites preferred host's thorax for attachment as compared to the head, pre-abdomen or appendages. The present study suggests phoretic relationship between parasitic mites and mosquitoes. Wide occurrence, intensity of infection, parasitic load, and attachment preferences of the mites suggested their positive role in biological control of adult mosquitoes. The present study will set the path of future studies on host–parasite relationships of mites and mosquitoes and define the role of parasitic mites in the biological control of mosquitoes. Keywords: Mosquito, Mites, Host, Parasite, Infection, Biocontrol
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0085562617300092
work_keys_str_mv AT atwaaatwa hostparasiteinteractionandimpactofmiteinfectiononmosquitopopulation
AT anwarlbilgrami hostparasiteinteractionandimpactofmiteinfectiononmosquitopopulation
AT ahmadimalsaggaf hostparasiteinteractionandimpactofmiteinfectiononmosquitopopulation
_version_ 1725401910870016000