Comments on “An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors”

Comments on “An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors”

The purpose of these comments is to serve as a revision to the article by Khan, Jaber, & Bonney [2011, An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors, International Journal of Production Economics, 133: 113–118]. This commenting paper first suggests that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui-Ming Teng, Ping-Hui Hsu, Hui Ming Wee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Growing Science 2013-01-01
Series:International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
Subjects:
Imperfect process
Misclassification errors
EOQ
Online Access:http://www.growingscience.com/ijiec/Vol3/IJIEC_2012_65.pdf
id doaj-87125a9863984f8c9a91ac201f2058fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-87125a9863984f8c9a91ac201f2058fb2020-11-24T21:10:40ZengGrowing ScienceInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations1923-29261923-29342013-01-0141173176Comments on “An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors”Hui-Ming TengPing-Hui HsuHui Ming WeeThe purpose of these comments is to serve as a revision to the article by Khan, Jaber, & Bonney [2011, An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors, International Journal of Production Economics, 133: 113–118]. This commenting paper first suggests that the revenue function derived in Khan et al. (2011) is unrealistic, and then offers revisions to complement the shortcomings.http://www.growingscience.com/ijiec/Vol3/IJIEC_2012_65.pdfImperfect processMisclassification errorsEOQ
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hui-Ming Teng
Ping-Hui Hsu
Hui Ming Wee
spellingShingle Hui-Ming Teng
Ping-Hui Hsu
Hui Ming Wee
Comments on “An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors”
International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
Imperfect process
Misclassification errors
EOQ
author_facet Hui-Ming Teng
Ping-Hui Hsu
Hui Ming Wee
author_sort Hui-Ming Teng
title Comments on “An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors”
title_short Comments on “An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors”
title_full Comments on “An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors”
title_fullStr Comments on “An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors”
title_full_unstemmed Comments on “An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors”
title_sort comments on “an economic order quantity (eoq) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors”
publisher Growing Science
series International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations
issn 1923-2926
1923-2934
publishDate 2013-01-01
description The purpose of these comments is to serve as a revision to the article by Khan, Jaber, & Bonney [2011, An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors, International Journal of Production Economics, 133: 113–118]. This commenting paper first suggests that the revenue function derived in Khan et al. (2011) is unrealistic, and then offers revisions to complement the shortcomings.
topic Imperfect process
Misclassification errors
EOQ
url http://www.growingscience.com/ijiec/Vol3/IJIEC_2012_65.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT huimingteng commentsonaneconomicorderquantityeoqforitemswithimperfectqualityandinspectionerrors
AT pinghuihsu commentsonaneconomicorderquantityeoqforitemswithimperfectqualityandinspectionerrors
AT huimingwee commentsonaneconomicorderquantityeoqforitemswithimperfectqualityandinspectionerrors
_version_ 1716755674016251904

Similar Items