Impact of the method of G6PD deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility.

BACKGROUND:Clinical association studies have yielded varied results regarding the impact of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency upon susceptibility to malaria. Analyses have been complicated by varied methods used to diagnose G6PD deficiency. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We compare...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marla K Johnson, Tamara D Clark, Denise Njama-Meya, Philip J Rosenthal, Sunil Parikh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009-09-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2748715?pdf=render
id doaj-8748d875b6ee41cebde191731ea610a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8748d875b6ee41cebde191731ea610a82020-11-25T01:45:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032009-09-0149e724610.1371/journal.pone.0007246Impact of the method of G6PD deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility.Marla K JohnsonTamara D ClarkDenise Njama-MeyaPhilip J RosenthalSunil ParikhBACKGROUND:Clinical association studies have yielded varied results regarding the impact of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency upon susceptibility to malaria. Analyses have been complicated by varied methods used to diagnose G6PD deficiency. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We compared the association between uncomplicated malaria incidence and G6PD deficiency in a cohort of 601 Ugandan children using two different diagnostic methods, enzyme activity and G6PD genotype (G202A, the predominant East African allele). Although roughly the same percentage of males were identified as deficient using enzyme activity (12%) and genotype (14%), nearly 30% of males who were enzymatically deficient were wild-type at G202A. The number of deficient females was three-fold higher with assessment by genotype (21%) compared to enzyme activity (7%). Heterozygous females accounted for the majority (46/54) of children with a mutant genotype but normal enzyme activity. G6PD deficiency, as determined by G6PD enzyme activity, conferred a 52% (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.75) reduced risk of uncomplicated malaria in females. In contrast, when G6PD deficiency was defined based on genotype, the protective association for females was no longer seen (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.70-1.39). Notably, restricting the analysis to those females who were both genotypically and enzymatically deficient, the association of deficiency and protection from uncomplicated malaria was again demonstrated in females, but not in males (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.88 for females). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:This study underscores the impact that the method of identifying G6PD deficient individuals has upon association studies of G6PD deficiency and uncomplicated malaria. We found that G6PD-deficient females were significantly protected against uncomplicated malaria, but this protection was only seen when G6PD deficiency is described using enzyme activity. These observations may help to explain the discrepancy in some published association studies involving G6PD deficiency and uncomplicated malaria.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2748715?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marla K Johnson
Tamara D Clark
Denise Njama-Meya
Philip J Rosenthal
Sunil Parikh
spellingShingle Marla K Johnson
Tamara D Clark
Denise Njama-Meya
Philip J Rosenthal
Sunil Parikh
Impact of the method of G6PD deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Marla K Johnson
Tamara D Clark
Denise Njama-Meya
Philip J Rosenthal
Sunil Parikh
author_sort Marla K Johnson
title Impact of the method of G6PD deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility.
title_short Impact of the method of G6PD deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility.
title_full Impact of the method of G6PD deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility.
title_fullStr Impact of the method of G6PD deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility.
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the method of G6PD deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility.
title_sort impact of the method of g6pd deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2009-09-01
description BACKGROUND:Clinical association studies have yielded varied results regarding the impact of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency upon susceptibility to malaria. Analyses have been complicated by varied methods used to diagnose G6PD deficiency. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We compared the association between uncomplicated malaria incidence and G6PD deficiency in a cohort of 601 Ugandan children using two different diagnostic methods, enzyme activity and G6PD genotype (G202A, the predominant East African allele). Although roughly the same percentage of males were identified as deficient using enzyme activity (12%) and genotype (14%), nearly 30% of males who were enzymatically deficient were wild-type at G202A. The number of deficient females was three-fold higher with assessment by genotype (21%) compared to enzyme activity (7%). Heterozygous females accounted for the majority (46/54) of children with a mutant genotype but normal enzyme activity. G6PD deficiency, as determined by G6PD enzyme activity, conferred a 52% (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.75) reduced risk of uncomplicated malaria in females. In contrast, when G6PD deficiency was defined based on genotype, the protective association for females was no longer seen (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.70-1.39). Notably, restricting the analysis to those females who were both genotypically and enzymatically deficient, the association of deficiency and protection from uncomplicated malaria was again demonstrated in females, but not in males (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.88 for females). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:This study underscores the impact that the method of identifying G6PD deficient individuals has upon association studies of G6PD deficiency and uncomplicated malaria. We found that G6PD-deficient females were significantly protected against uncomplicated malaria, but this protection was only seen when G6PD deficiency is described using enzyme activity. These observations may help to explain the discrepancy in some published association studies involving G6PD deficiency and uncomplicated malaria.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2748715?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT marlakjohnson impactofthemethodofg6pddeficiencyassessmentongeneticassociationstudiesofmalariasusceptibility
AT tamaradclark impactofthemethodofg6pddeficiencyassessmentongeneticassociationstudiesofmalariasusceptibility
AT denisenjamameya impactofthemethodofg6pddeficiencyassessmentongeneticassociationstudiesofmalariasusceptibility
AT philipjrosenthal impactofthemethodofg6pddeficiencyassessmentongeneticassociationstudiesofmalariasusceptibility
AT sunilparikh impactofthemethodofg6pddeficiencyassessmentongeneticassociationstudiesofmalariasusceptibility
_version_ 1725021530153287680