Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications
The quest towards increasing the energy density of traction battery technologies has led to the emergence and diversification of battery materials. The lithium sulfur battery (LSB) is in this regard a promising material for batteries due to its specific energy. However, due to its low volumetric ene...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/150 |
id |
doaj-877062932a2d48df87601883e90ade02 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-877062932a2d48df87601883e90ade022020-11-24T21:10:28ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732018-01-0111115010.3390/en11010150en11010150Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility ApplicationsFelipe Cerdas0Paul Titscher1Nicolas Bognar2Richard Schmuch3Martin Winter4Arno Kwade5Christoph Herrmann6Chair of Sustainable Manufacturing & Life Cycle Engineering, Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology (IWF), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19b, 38106 Braunschweig, GermanyInstitute for Particle Technology (iPAT), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Volkmaroder Straße 5, 38104 Braunschweig, GermanyChair of Sustainable Manufacturing & Life Cycle Engineering, Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology (IWF), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19b, 38106 Braunschweig, GermanyMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstraße 46, 48149 Münster, GermanyMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstraße 46, 48149 Münster, GermanyInstitute for Particle Technology (iPAT), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Volkmaroder Straße 5, 38104 Braunschweig, GermanyChair of Sustainable Manufacturing & Life Cycle Engineering, Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology (IWF), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19b, 38106 Braunschweig, GermanyThe quest towards increasing the energy density of traction battery technologies has led to the emergence and diversification of battery materials. The lithium sulfur battery (LSB) is in this regard a promising material for batteries due to its specific energy. However, due to its low volumetric energy density, the LSB faces challenges in mobility applications such as electric vehicles but also other transportation modes. To understand the potential environmental implication of LSB batteries, a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed. For this study, electrodes for both an NMC111 with an anode graphite and a LSB battery cell with a lithium metal foil as anode were manufactured. Data from disassembly experiments performed on a real battery system for a mid-size passenger vehicle were used to build the required life cycle inventory. The energy consumption during the use phase was calculated using a simulative approach. A set of thirteen impact categories was evaluated and characterized with the ReCiPe methodology. The results of the LCA in this study allow identification of the main sources of environmental problems as well as possible strategies to improve the environmental impact of LSB batteries. In this regard, the high requirements of N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) for the processing of the sulfur cathode and the thickness of the lithium foil were identified as the most important drivers. We make recommendations for necessary further research in order to broaden the understanding concerning the potential environmental implication of the implementation of LSB batteries for mobility applications.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/150lithium-ion batteriespost lithium-ion batterieslithium-sulfur batterieslife cycle assessmentelectric vehicles |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Felipe Cerdas Paul Titscher Nicolas Bognar Richard Schmuch Martin Winter Arno Kwade Christoph Herrmann |
spellingShingle |
Felipe Cerdas Paul Titscher Nicolas Bognar Richard Schmuch Martin Winter Arno Kwade Christoph Herrmann Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications Energies lithium-ion batteries post lithium-ion batteries lithium-sulfur batteries life cycle assessment electric vehicles |
author_facet |
Felipe Cerdas Paul Titscher Nicolas Bognar Richard Schmuch Martin Winter Arno Kwade Christoph Herrmann |
author_sort |
Felipe Cerdas |
title |
Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications |
title_short |
Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications |
title_full |
Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications |
title_fullStr |
Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications |
title_sort |
exploring the effect of increased energy density on the environmental impacts of traction batteries: a comparison of energy optimized lithium-ion and lithium-sulfur batteries for mobility applications |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
The quest towards increasing the energy density of traction battery technologies has led to the emergence and diversification of battery materials. The lithium sulfur battery (LSB) is in this regard a promising material for batteries due to its specific energy. However, due to its low volumetric energy density, the LSB faces challenges in mobility applications such as electric vehicles but also other transportation modes. To understand the potential environmental implication of LSB batteries, a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed. For this study, electrodes for both an NMC111 with an anode graphite and a LSB battery cell with a lithium metal foil as anode were manufactured. Data from disassembly experiments performed on a real battery system for a mid-size passenger vehicle were used to build the required life cycle inventory. The energy consumption during the use phase was calculated using a simulative approach. A set of thirteen impact categories was evaluated and characterized with the ReCiPe methodology. The results of the LCA in this study allow identification of the main sources of environmental problems as well as possible strategies to improve the environmental impact of LSB batteries. In this regard, the high requirements of N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) for the processing of the sulfur cathode and the thickness of the lithium foil were identified as the most important drivers. We make recommendations for necessary further research in order to broaden the understanding concerning the potential environmental implication of the implementation of LSB batteries for mobility applications. |
topic |
lithium-ion batteries post lithium-ion batteries lithium-sulfur batteries life cycle assessment electric vehicles |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/150 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT felipecerdas exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications AT paultitscher exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications AT nicolasbognar exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications AT richardschmuch exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications AT martinwinter exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications AT arnokwade exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications AT christophherrmann exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications |
_version_ |
1716756359624523776 |