Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications

The quest towards increasing the energy density of traction battery technologies has led to the emergence and diversification of battery materials. The lithium sulfur battery (LSB) is in this regard a promising material for batteries due to its specific energy. However, due to its low volumetric ene...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Felipe Cerdas, Paul Titscher, Nicolas Bognar, Richard Schmuch, Martin Winter, Arno Kwade, Christoph Herrmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-01-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/150
id doaj-877062932a2d48df87601883e90ade02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-877062932a2d48df87601883e90ade022020-11-24T21:10:28ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732018-01-0111115010.3390/en11010150en11010150Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility ApplicationsFelipe Cerdas0Paul Titscher1Nicolas Bognar2Richard Schmuch3Martin Winter4Arno Kwade5Christoph Herrmann6Chair of Sustainable Manufacturing & Life Cycle Engineering, Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology (IWF), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19b, 38106 Braunschweig, GermanyInstitute for Particle Technology (iPAT), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Volkmaroder Straße 5, 38104 Braunschweig, GermanyChair of Sustainable Manufacturing & Life Cycle Engineering, Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology (IWF), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19b, 38106 Braunschweig, GermanyMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstraße 46, 48149 Münster, GermanyMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstraße 46, 48149 Münster, GermanyInstitute for Particle Technology (iPAT), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Volkmaroder Straße 5, 38104 Braunschweig, GermanyChair of Sustainable Manufacturing & Life Cycle Engineering, Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology (IWF), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19b, 38106 Braunschweig, GermanyThe quest towards increasing the energy density of traction battery technologies has led to the emergence and diversification of battery materials. The lithium sulfur battery (LSB) is in this regard a promising material for batteries due to its specific energy. However, due to its low volumetric energy density, the LSB faces challenges in mobility applications such as electric vehicles but also other transportation modes. To understand the potential environmental implication of LSB batteries, a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed. For this study, electrodes for both an NMC111 with an anode graphite and a LSB battery cell with a lithium metal foil as anode were manufactured. Data from disassembly experiments performed on a real battery system for a mid-size passenger vehicle were used to build the required life cycle inventory. The energy consumption during the use phase was calculated using a simulative approach. A set of thirteen impact categories was evaluated and characterized with the ReCiPe methodology. The results of the LCA in this study allow identification of the main sources of environmental problems as well as possible strategies to improve the environmental impact of LSB batteries. In this regard, the high requirements of N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) for the processing of the sulfur cathode and the thickness of the lithium foil were identified as the most important drivers. We make recommendations for necessary further research in order to broaden the understanding concerning the potential environmental implication of the implementation of LSB batteries for mobility applications.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/150lithium-ion batteriespost lithium-ion batterieslithium-sulfur batterieslife cycle assessmentelectric vehicles
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Felipe Cerdas
Paul Titscher
Nicolas Bognar
Richard Schmuch
Martin Winter
Arno Kwade
Christoph Herrmann
spellingShingle Felipe Cerdas
Paul Titscher
Nicolas Bognar
Richard Schmuch
Martin Winter
Arno Kwade
Christoph Herrmann
Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications
Energies
lithium-ion batteries
post lithium-ion batteries
lithium-sulfur batteries
life cycle assessment
electric vehicles
author_facet Felipe Cerdas
Paul Titscher
Nicolas Bognar
Richard Schmuch
Martin Winter
Arno Kwade
Christoph Herrmann
author_sort Felipe Cerdas
title Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications
title_short Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications
title_full Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications
title_fullStr Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications
title_sort exploring the effect of increased energy density on the environmental impacts of traction batteries: a comparison of energy optimized lithium-ion and lithium-sulfur batteries for mobility applications
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The quest towards increasing the energy density of traction battery technologies has led to the emergence and diversification of battery materials. The lithium sulfur battery (LSB) is in this regard a promising material for batteries due to its specific energy. However, due to its low volumetric energy density, the LSB faces challenges in mobility applications such as electric vehicles but also other transportation modes. To understand the potential environmental implication of LSB batteries, a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed. For this study, electrodes for both an NMC111 with an anode graphite and a LSB battery cell with a lithium metal foil as anode were manufactured. Data from disassembly experiments performed on a real battery system for a mid-size passenger vehicle were used to build the required life cycle inventory. The energy consumption during the use phase was calculated using a simulative approach. A set of thirteen impact categories was evaluated and characterized with the ReCiPe methodology. The results of the LCA in this study allow identification of the main sources of environmental problems as well as possible strategies to improve the environmental impact of LSB batteries. In this regard, the high requirements of N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) for the processing of the sulfur cathode and the thickness of the lithium foil were identified as the most important drivers. We make recommendations for necessary further research in order to broaden the understanding concerning the potential environmental implication of the implementation of LSB batteries for mobility applications.
topic lithium-ion batteries
post lithium-ion batteries
lithium-sulfur batteries
life cycle assessment
electric vehicles
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/1/150
work_keys_str_mv AT felipecerdas exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications
AT paultitscher exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications
AT nicolasbognar exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications
AT richardschmuch exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications
AT martinwinter exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications
AT arnokwade exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications
AT christophherrmann exploringtheeffectofincreasedenergydensityontheenvironmentalimpactsoftractionbatteriesacomparisonofenergyoptimizedlithiumionandlithiumsulfurbatteriesformobilityapplications
_version_ 1716756359624523776