Near-Source Risk Functions for Particulate Matter Are Critical When Assessing the Health Benefits of Local Abatement Strategies
When mortality or other health outcomes attributable to fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) are estimated, the same exposure–response function (ERF) is usually assumed regardless of the source and composition of the particles, and independently of the spatial resolution applied in...
Main Authors: | David Segersson, Christer Johansson, Bertil Forsberg |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6847 |
Similar Items
-
Subsidy or policy certainty: Which attribute is more important for broiler farmers when investing in particulate matter abatement technology?
by: Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Health Impact of PM10, PM2.5 and Black Carbon Exposure Due to Different Source Sectors in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Umea, Sweden
by: David Segersson, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Assessment of Particulate Matter Exposure in Franklin County, Ohio: A Comparison of Static and Dynamic Approaches
by: Sineri, Jaclyn R.
Published: (2010) -
Maternal Exposure to Particulate Matter during Pregnancy and Adverse Birth Outcomes in the Republic of Korea
by: Yu Jin Kim, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Secondary Particulate Matter Originating from an Industrial Source and Its Impact on Population Health
by: Cristina Mangia, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01)