Towards an Ever Dirtier Europe? The Restrictive Standing of Environmental NGOs before the European Courts and the Aarhus Convention

In European Union law, the existence of an effective remedy to challenge EU actions has been at the core of a heated ongoing debate, since individual applicants and NGOs often have a hard time obtaining locus standi in annulment proceedings, due to the restrictive interpretation given by the Europea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mariolina Eliantonio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law 2011-12-01
Series:Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/115
id doaj-8782c95e78ab470d8ff28c7ab651771d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8782c95e78ab470d8ff28c7ab651771d2020-11-25T02:44:51ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of LawCroatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy1845-56621848-99582011-12-017698610.3935/cyelp.07.2011.115Towards an Ever Dirtier Europe? The Restrictive Standing of Environmental NGOs before the European Courts and the Aarhus ConventionMariolina Eliantonio0Maastricht UniversityIn European Union law, the existence of an effective remedy to challenge EU actions has been at the core of a heated ongoing debate, since individual applicants and NGOs often have a hard time obtaining locus standi in annulment proceedings, due to the restrictive interpretation given by the European Court of Justice to the standing requirements provided by (the former) Article 230(4) of the EC Treaty. The aim of this paper is to show how access to justice before the EU courts for environmental NGOs has been significantly curtailed up to the present, and to discuss the changes to the standing test brought by the Lisbon Treaty by analysing its content and the (to date) limited interpretation given by the European Courts to the term ‘regulatory act’ introduced by the Treaty. On the basis of this examination, it will be shown how the recent amendments have not changed the position of NGOs who wish to challenge EU environmental measures and how, therefore, a significant gap in judicial protection and a potential violation of Articles 9(2) and (3) of the Aarhus Convention still remain.https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/115individual applicantslocus standiannulment proceedingseuropean court of justiceaccess to justiceenvironmental ngoslisbon treatyaarhus conventionex-article 230(4) ec
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariolina Eliantonio
spellingShingle Mariolina Eliantonio
Towards an Ever Dirtier Europe? The Restrictive Standing of Environmental NGOs before the European Courts and the Aarhus Convention
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
individual applicants
locus standi
annulment proceedings
european court of justice
access to justice
environmental ngos
lisbon treaty
aarhus convention
ex-article 230(4) ec
author_facet Mariolina Eliantonio
author_sort Mariolina Eliantonio
title Towards an Ever Dirtier Europe? The Restrictive Standing of Environmental NGOs before the European Courts and the Aarhus Convention
title_short Towards an Ever Dirtier Europe? The Restrictive Standing of Environmental NGOs before the European Courts and the Aarhus Convention
title_full Towards an Ever Dirtier Europe? The Restrictive Standing of Environmental NGOs before the European Courts and the Aarhus Convention
title_fullStr Towards an Ever Dirtier Europe? The Restrictive Standing of Environmental NGOs before the European Courts and the Aarhus Convention
title_full_unstemmed Towards an Ever Dirtier Europe? The Restrictive Standing of Environmental NGOs before the European Courts and the Aarhus Convention
title_sort towards an ever dirtier europe? the restrictive standing of environmental ngos before the european courts and the aarhus convention
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
series Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
issn 1845-5662
1848-9958
publishDate 2011-12-01
description In European Union law, the existence of an effective remedy to challenge EU actions has been at the core of a heated ongoing debate, since individual applicants and NGOs often have a hard time obtaining locus standi in annulment proceedings, due to the restrictive interpretation given by the European Court of Justice to the standing requirements provided by (the former) Article 230(4) of the EC Treaty. The aim of this paper is to show how access to justice before the EU courts for environmental NGOs has been significantly curtailed up to the present, and to discuss the changes to the standing test brought by the Lisbon Treaty by analysing its content and the (to date) limited interpretation given by the European Courts to the term ‘regulatory act’ introduced by the Treaty. On the basis of this examination, it will be shown how the recent amendments have not changed the position of NGOs who wish to challenge EU environmental measures and how, therefore, a significant gap in judicial protection and a potential violation of Articles 9(2) and (3) of the Aarhus Convention still remain.
topic individual applicants
locus standi
annulment proceedings
european court of justice
access to justice
environmental ngos
lisbon treaty
aarhus convention
ex-article 230(4) ec
url https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/115
work_keys_str_mv AT mariolinaeliantonio towardsaneverdirtiereuropetherestrictivestandingofenvironmentalngosbeforetheeuropeancourtsandtheaarhusconvention
_version_ 1724765644502597632