The health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting in South Africa

Background: Worldwide, there is an increased reliance on casual staff in the health sector. Recent policy attention in South Africa has focused on the interrelated challenges of agency nursing and moonlighting in the health sector. Objective: This paper examines the potential health system consequen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laetitia C. Rispel, Duane Blaauw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2015-05-01
Series:Global Health Action
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/26683/pdf_75
id doaj-8783f4a753b9475fa54b16c5de3ce92b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8783f4a753b9475fa54b16c5de3ce92b2020-11-24T22:24:25ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-98802015-05-018011410.3402/gha.v8.2668326683The health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting in South AfricaLaetitia C. Rispel0Duane Blaauw1Centre for Health Policy & Medical Research Council Health Policy Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaCentre for Health Policy & Medical Research Council Health Policy Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaBackground: Worldwide, there is an increased reliance on casual staff in the health sector. Recent policy attention in South Africa has focused on the interrelated challenges of agency nursing and moonlighting in the health sector. Objective: This paper examines the potential health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting among South African nurses. Methods: During 2010, a cluster random sample of 80 hospitals was selected in four South African provinces. On the survey day, all nurses providing clinical care completed a self-administered questionnaire after giving informed consent. The questionnaire obtained information on socio-demographics, involvement in agency nursing and moonlighting, and self-reported indicators of potential health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting. A weighted analysis was done using STATA® 13. Results: In the survey, 40.7% of nurses reported moonlighting or working for an agency in the preceding year. Of all participants, 51.5% reported feeling too tired to work, 11.5% paid less attention to nursing work on duty, and 10.9% took sick leave when not actually sick in the preceding year. Among the moonlighters, 11.9% had taken vacation leave to do agency work or moonlighting, and 9.8% reported conflicting schedules between their primary and secondary jobs. In the bivariate analysis, moonlighting nurses were significantly more likely than non-moonlighters to take sick leave when not sick (p=0.011) and to pay less attention to nursing work on duty (p=0.035). However, in a multiple logistic regression analysis, the differences between moonlighters and non-moonlighters did not remain statistically significant after adjusting for other socio-demographic variables. Conclusion: Although moonlighting did not emerge as a statistically significant predictor, the reported health system consequences are serious. A combination of strong nursing leadership, effective management, and consultation with and buy-in from front-line nurses is needed to counteract the potential negative health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting.http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/26683/pdf_75agency nursingmoonlightingnurseshealth systemquality of careSouth Africa
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laetitia C. Rispel
Duane Blaauw
spellingShingle Laetitia C. Rispel
Duane Blaauw
The health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting in South Africa
Global Health Action
agency nursing
moonlighting
nurses
health system
quality of care
South Africa
author_facet Laetitia C. Rispel
Duane Blaauw
author_sort Laetitia C. Rispel
title The health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting in South Africa
title_short The health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting in South Africa
title_full The health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting in South Africa
title_fullStr The health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed The health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting in South Africa
title_sort health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting in south africa
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Global Health Action
issn 1654-9880
publishDate 2015-05-01
description Background: Worldwide, there is an increased reliance on casual staff in the health sector. Recent policy attention in South Africa has focused on the interrelated challenges of agency nursing and moonlighting in the health sector. Objective: This paper examines the potential health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting among South African nurses. Methods: During 2010, a cluster random sample of 80 hospitals was selected in four South African provinces. On the survey day, all nurses providing clinical care completed a self-administered questionnaire after giving informed consent. The questionnaire obtained information on socio-demographics, involvement in agency nursing and moonlighting, and self-reported indicators of potential health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting. A weighted analysis was done using STATA® 13. Results: In the survey, 40.7% of nurses reported moonlighting or working for an agency in the preceding year. Of all participants, 51.5% reported feeling too tired to work, 11.5% paid less attention to nursing work on duty, and 10.9% took sick leave when not actually sick in the preceding year. Among the moonlighters, 11.9% had taken vacation leave to do agency work or moonlighting, and 9.8% reported conflicting schedules between their primary and secondary jobs. In the bivariate analysis, moonlighting nurses were significantly more likely than non-moonlighters to take sick leave when not sick (p=0.011) and to pay less attention to nursing work on duty (p=0.035). However, in a multiple logistic regression analysis, the differences between moonlighters and non-moonlighters did not remain statistically significant after adjusting for other socio-demographic variables. Conclusion: Although moonlighting did not emerge as a statistically significant predictor, the reported health system consequences are serious. A combination of strong nursing leadership, effective management, and consultation with and buy-in from front-line nurses is needed to counteract the potential negative health system consequences of agency nursing and moonlighting.
topic agency nursing
moonlighting
nurses
health system
quality of care
South Africa
url http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/26683/pdf_75
work_keys_str_mv AT laetitiacrispel thehealthsystemconsequencesofagencynursingandmoonlightinginsouthafrica
AT duaneblaauw thehealthsystemconsequencesofagencynursingandmoonlightinginsouthafrica
AT laetitiacrispel healthsystemconsequencesofagencynursingandmoonlightinginsouthafrica
AT duaneblaauw healthsystemconsequencesofagencynursingandmoonlightinginsouthafrica
_version_ 1725761417120841728