Indwelling pleural catheters for recurrent pleural effusions: A useful clinical tool with serious implications

Background: Indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) have been used increasingly in patients with recurrent pleural effusions. However, data about mortality after IPC use are limited. Objectives: We sought to determine the natural history following IPC placement in Lubbock, Texas, in terms of life expecta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samuel Copeland, Audra Schwalk, Salkowan Suchartlikitwong, Shengping Yang, Gilbert Berdine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles 2018-07-01
Series:Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pulmonarychronicles.com/index.php/pulmonarychronicles/article/view/477
id doaj-87a366dff82243848304fe5026381701
record_format Article
spelling doaj-87a366dff82243848304fe50263817012020-11-25T01:33:06ZengSouthwest Respiratory and Critical Care ChroniclesSouthwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles2325-92052018-07-0162581310.12746/swrccc.v6i25.477392Indwelling pleural catheters for recurrent pleural effusions: A useful clinical tool with serious implicationsSamuel CopelandAudra SchwalkSalkowan SuchartlikitwongShengping YangGilbert BerdineBackground: Indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) have been used increasingly in patients with recurrent pleural effusions. However, data about mortality after IPC use are limited. Objectives: We sought to determine the natural history following IPC placement in Lubbock, Texas, in terms of life expectancy and pleurodesis rates in patients with both malignant and benign effusions. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who had IPC insertion from March 2014 through December 2016 at University Medical Center in Lubbock, Texas, was performed. Patients 18 years and older who had IPC placement for recurrent pleural effusions were included. The duration of IPC placement, the type of pleural effusion, the volume of fluid, pleurodesis, complications, and mortality after IPC placement were retrieved from electronic medical records. Results: There were 45 patients included in the study; 20 patients (44%) were male, and 25 patients (56%) were female. The mean age was 63.5 years old. There were 33 patients with malignant pleural effusion and 12 patients with benign pleural effusion. No patients with malignant effusion were known to be alive at the time of mortality calculation, whereas two patients with benign effusion were known to be alive. Median survival was 468 days in the benign effusion group and 115 days in the malignant effusion group. The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (malignant 34.5% vs. benign 25.0%). However, 1-year mortality was significantly higher in the malignant effusion group (89.7%) than in the benign effusion group (41.7%) (p < 0.005). Conclusion: The use of indwelling pleural catheters in Lubbock, Texas, has comparable results to published studies. These catheters should be considered as a bridge to a long-term treatment rather than a definitive therapy.http://www.pulmonarychronicles.com/index.php/pulmonarychronicles/article/view/477Recurrent pleural effusion, indwelling pleural catheter, mortality, survival, pleurodesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samuel Copeland
Audra Schwalk
Salkowan Suchartlikitwong
Shengping Yang
Gilbert Berdine
spellingShingle Samuel Copeland
Audra Schwalk
Salkowan Suchartlikitwong
Shengping Yang
Gilbert Berdine
Indwelling pleural catheters for recurrent pleural effusions: A useful clinical tool with serious implications
Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles
Recurrent pleural effusion, indwelling pleural catheter, mortality, survival, pleurodesis
author_facet Samuel Copeland
Audra Schwalk
Salkowan Suchartlikitwong
Shengping Yang
Gilbert Berdine
author_sort Samuel Copeland
title Indwelling pleural catheters for recurrent pleural effusions: A useful clinical tool with serious implications
title_short Indwelling pleural catheters for recurrent pleural effusions: A useful clinical tool with serious implications
title_full Indwelling pleural catheters for recurrent pleural effusions: A useful clinical tool with serious implications
title_fullStr Indwelling pleural catheters for recurrent pleural effusions: A useful clinical tool with serious implications
title_full_unstemmed Indwelling pleural catheters for recurrent pleural effusions: A useful clinical tool with serious implications
title_sort indwelling pleural catheters for recurrent pleural effusions: a useful clinical tool with serious implications
publisher Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles
series Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles
issn 2325-9205
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Background: Indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) have been used increasingly in patients with recurrent pleural effusions. However, data about mortality after IPC use are limited. Objectives: We sought to determine the natural history following IPC placement in Lubbock, Texas, in terms of life expectancy and pleurodesis rates in patients with both malignant and benign effusions. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who had IPC insertion from March 2014 through December 2016 at University Medical Center in Lubbock, Texas, was performed. Patients 18 years and older who had IPC placement for recurrent pleural effusions were included. The duration of IPC placement, the type of pleural effusion, the volume of fluid, pleurodesis, complications, and mortality after IPC placement were retrieved from electronic medical records. Results: There were 45 patients included in the study; 20 patients (44%) were male, and 25 patients (56%) were female. The mean age was 63.5 years old. There were 33 patients with malignant pleural effusion and 12 patients with benign pleural effusion. No patients with malignant effusion were known to be alive at the time of mortality calculation, whereas two patients with benign effusion were known to be alive. Median survival was 468 days in the benign effusion group and 115 days in the malignant effusion group. The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (malignant 34.5% vs. benign 25.0%). However, 1-year mortality was significantly higher in the malignant effusion group (89.7%) than in the benign effusion group (41.7%) (p < 0.005). Conclusion: The use of indwelling pleural catheters in Lubbock, Texas, has comparable results to published studies. These catheters should be considered as a bridge to a long-term treatment rather than a definitive therapy.
topic Recurrent pleural effusion, indwelling pleural catheter, mortality, survival, pleurodesis
url http://www.pulmonarychronicles.com/index.php/pulmonarychronicles/article/view/477
work_keys_str_mv AT samuelcopeland indwellingpleuralcathetersforrecurrentpleuraleffusionsausefulclinicaltoolwithseriousimplications
AT audraschwalk indwellingpleuralcathetersforrecurrentpleuraleffusionsausefulclinicaltoolwithseriousimplications
AT salkowansuchartlikitwong indwellingpleuralcathetersforrecurrentpleuraleffusionsausefulclinicaltoolwithseriousimplications
AT shengpingyang indwellingpleuralcathetersforrecurrentpleuraleffusionsausefulclinicaltoolwithseriousimplications
AT gilbertberdine indwellingpleuralcathetersforrecurrentpleuraleffusionsausefulclinicaltoolwithseriousimplications
_version_ 1725079278179057664