Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?

Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, with an estimated 1.7 million new cases occurring in 2012. The majority of cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where population-based mammography screening is not available and countries must rely...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vivien Tsu, John R Scheel, Amie Bishop, Marjorie Murray, Bernhard Weigl, Constance D Lehman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Massachusetts Medical School 2015-11-01
Series:Journal of Global Radiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jgr/vol1/iss2/1
id doaj-87a994ad17704e93a398e4ccdc9319c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-87a994ad17704e93a398e4ccdc9319c72020-11-24T23:23:21ZengUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolJournal of Global Radiology2372-84182015-11-011210.7191/jgr.2015.1015Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?Vivien Tsu0John R Scheel1Amie Bishop2Marjorie Murray3Bernhard Weigl4Constance D Lehman5PATHUniversity of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care AllianceAmie Bishop Consulting, LLCPATHIntellectual Ventures Lab/Global GoodMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolPurpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, with an estimated 1.7 million new cases occurring in 2012. The majority of cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where population-based mammography screening is not available and countries must rely on clinical breast examination (CBE). Since ultrasound has the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies by triaging women with palpable or focal breast findings at CBE, we searched for evidence in the literature on the effectiveness of ultrasound in detecting potential breast cancer following positive CBE findings. Methods: We reviewed the literature from 2000 to 2014 for evidence on the performance of breast ultrasound, in the absence of mammography, used to evaluate women after a positive CBE. From the studies meeting our inclusion/exclusion criteria for our analysis, we extracted data on the study design, location, ultrasound transducer parameters, patient age, method for determining positive and negative cases, and number of malignancies detected/total number of women studied. Results: We found 15 studies matching our inclusion/exclusion criteria, 9 from high-income countries and 6 from LMICs. Despite considerable variability in study design and patient populations, breast ultrasound consistently showed high sensitivity (median = 94 percent) and specificity (median = 80 percent) for detecting breast cancer and identifying normal and benign findings not requiring a biopsy. Clear patterns related to transducer frequency or income level were not discernible given the variations in patient populations and final diagnostic determinations. Conclusion: Our systematic review suggests that breast ultrasound following a positive CBE may be a powerful diagnostic test to determine those who do or do not need biopsy. We encourage further research in breast ultrasound use after a positive CBE in LMICs to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in these settings and the feasibility of widespread implementation.http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jgr/vol1/iss2/1Ultrasounddeveloping countriesbreast cancerclinical breast exam
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vivien Tsu
John R Scheel
Amie Bishop
Marjorie Murray
Bernhard Weigl
Constance D Lehman
spellingShingle Vivien Tsu
John R Scheel
Amie Bishop
Marjorie Murray
Bernhard Weigl
Constance D Lehman
Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
Journal of Global Radiology
Ultrasound
developing countries
breast cancer
clinical breast exam
author_facet Vivien Tsu
John R Scheel
Amie Bishop
Marjorie Murray
Bernhard Weigl
Constance D Lehman
author_sort Vivien Tsu
title Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
title_short Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
title_full Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
title_fullStr Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
title_full_unstemmed Breast Ultrasound Following a Positive Clinical Breast Examination: Does It Have a Role in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
title_sort breast ultrasound following a positive clinical breast examination: does it have a role in low- and middle-income countries?
publisher University of Massachusetts Medical School
series Journal of Global Radiology
issn 2372-8418
publishDate 2015-11-01
description Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, with an estimated 1.7 million new cases occurring in 2012. The majority of cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where population-based mammography screening is not available and countries must rely on clinical breast examination (CBE). Since ultrasound has the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies by triaging women with palpable or focal breast findings at CBE, we searched for evidence in the literature on the effectiveness of ultrasound in detecting potential breast cancer following positive CBE findings. Methods: We reviewed the literature from 2000 to 2014 for evidence on the performance of breast ultrasound, in the absence of mammography, used to evaluate women after a positive CBE. From the studies meeting our inclusion/exclusion criteria for our analysis, we extracted data on the study design, location, ultrasound transducer parameters, patient age, method for determining positive and negative cases, and number of malignancies detected/total number of women studied. Results: We found 15 studies matching our inclusion/exclusion criteria, 9 from high-income countries and 6 from LMICs. Despite considerable variability in study design and patient populations, breast ultrasound consistently showed high sensitivity (median = 94 percent) and specificity (median = 80 percent) for detecting breast cancer and identifying normal and benign findings not requiring a biopsy. Clear patterns related to transducer frequency or income level were not discernible given the variations in patient populations and final diagnostic determinations. Conclusion: Our systematic review suggests that breast ultrasound following a positive CBE may be a powerful diagnostic test to determine those who do or do not need biopsy. We encourage further research in breast ultrasound use after a positive CBE in LMICs to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in these settings and the feasibility of widespread implementation.
topic Ultrasound
developing countries
breast cancer
clinical breast exam
url http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jgr/vol1/iss2/1
work_keys_str_mv AT vivientsu breastultrasoundfollowingapositiveclinicalbreastexaminationdoesithavearoleinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT johnrscheel breastultrasoundfollowingapositiveclinicalbreastexaminationdoesithavearoleinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT amiebishop breastultrasoundfollowingapositiveclinicalbreastexaminationdoesithavearoleinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT marjoriemurray breastultrasoundfollowingapositiveclinicalbreastexaminationdoesithavearoleinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT bernhardweigl breastultrasoundfollowingapositiveclinicalbreastexaminationdoesithavearoleinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT constancedlehman breastultrasoundfollowingapositiveclinicalbreastexaminationdoesithavearoleinlowandmiddleincomecountries
_version_ 1725564015217737728